Hillary Clinton is Done

Status
Not open for further replies.
16.5 said:
I reviewed the transcript and she did not mention getting thrown off of the investigation, or anything about impeachment as far as I can see.

Did I miss it?
Click to expand...

Hey you are right, did you also notice how she didn't deny being sacked by Stalin for being too extreme? Is there no end to her lies?
 
16.5 said:
I reviewed the transcript and she did not mention getting thrown off of the investigation, or anything about impeachment as far as I can see.

Did I miss it?
Click to expand...

Why would she mention it? She wasn't thrown off the investigation, but left when it was winding down. She also didn't mention getting busted for smoking in the girls room at her convent, because that never happened, either.

Zeifman is an opportunist liar, and it's been proved several times.

Why are you repeating this lie? No cute little dodges and hair-splitting! You're repeating a verifiable lie.
 
Foolmewunz said:
Why would she mention it? She wasn't thrown off the investigation, but left when it was winding down. She also didn't mention getting busted for smoking in the girls room at her convent, because that never happened, either.

Zeifman is an opportunist liar, and it's been proved several times.

Why are you repeating this lie? No cute little dodges and hair-splitting! You're repeating a verifiable lie.
Click to expand...

It's the rule of Hillary
Darat said:
Simple test, does the claim make Clinton look bad or good, if it makes her look good it's a LIE, if it makes her look bad it's the truth or it could be the truth or it's definitely something she would have done so it's really the truth.
Click to expand...
It's the rule of Hillary
Darat said:
Simple test, does the claim make Clinton look bad or good, if it makes her look good it's a LIE, if it makes her look bad it's the truth or it could be the truth or it's definitely something she would have done so it's really the truth.
Click to expand...

This particular one is a variation of the last type: When you think about it even if she wasn't sacked she should have been so it's really the truth even though it never actually happened.
 
Foolmewunz said:
Why would she mention it? She wasn't thrown off the investigation, but left when it was winding down. She also didn't mention getting busted for smoking in the girls room at her convent, because that never happened, either.

Zeifman is an opportunist liar, and it's been proved several times.

Why are you repeating this lie? No cute little dodges and hair-splitting! You're repeating a verifiable lie.
Click to expand...

Clinton is an opportunist liar, and that has been proved several times.

Zeifman's explanation that he terminated her and would not give her a letter of recommendation is credible and quite compelling, particularly when coupled with the dishonest analysis in the memo Hillary wrote.
 
16.5 said:
I reviewed the transcript and she did not mention getting thrown off of the investigation, <snip>
Click to expand...

Of course she didn't mention something that didn't happen......

.....unless of course you have new evidence which is more reliable than Zeifman's lies.
 
The Don said:
Of course she didn't mention something that didn't happen......

.....unless of course you have new evidence which is more reliable than Zeifman's lies.
Click to expand...

Zeifman's statements are quite reliable. Don't hold the fact he is a Democrat against him!:thumbsup::D:thumbsup:
 
The Don said:
Errrrrr, no:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/zeifman.asp
.
Click to expand...

Umm, yes. While I am sure Snopes does a masterful job knocking down the latest Elvis sightings, lets just say that they should leave politics alone.

Case in point, the Snopes article you cite is a mishmash of poisoning the well, ad hominem fallacies, and bald faced conclusions.

I do enjoy how their support includes a number of opinions taken from a "book review." Not very compelling, folks.

It also appears to quibble with the right to be represented by counsel, despite the clear precedent set by the Douglas matter..
 
Here's an interesting interpretation of Hillary's ill-starred service during Watergate, “my reaction wasn’t so much that it was underhanded as it was just stupid.”

Hey, maybe this is the type of case that we should ascribe to Hillary's incompetence and not to her dishonesty.

Thoughts?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom