Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Stacko said:
You skipped over, "If a nominee became disabled." Was she threatening Clinton? This is just more self serving lies to sell the book.
Click to expand...

This was immediately after Clinton was seen to collapse in the street and had to be thrown in the back seat of an SUV like a sack of laundry. Her health was a subject of wide discussion, and not just by the right-wing. And Brazile has been a political operative for decades. Don't be so sure that she can't prove it all.
 
Last edited:
Bob001 said:
This was immediately after Clinton was seen to collapse in the street and had to be thrown in the back seat of an SUV like a sack of laundry. Her health was a subject of wide discussion, and not just by the right-wing. And Brazile has been a political operative for decades. Don't be so sure that she can't prove it all.
Click to expand...

That Hillary was actually disabled? Was there a body double that finished out the rest of the election and we all missed it?
 
Stacko said:
That Hillary was actually disabled? Was there a body double that finished out the rest of the election and we all missed it?
Click to expand...

Now you're being silly. No, not that H. was actually disabled. But that Brazile seriously considered starting the replacement process, and discussed it with others. She didn't do it, did she? And now here we are.
 
Bob001 said:
Now you're being silly. No, not that H. was actually disabled. But that Brazile seriously considered starting the replacement process, and discussed it with others. She didn't do it, did she? And now here we are.
Click to expand...

She didn't do it because she couldn't which is kinda the point.
 
Fast Eddie B said:
I will stipulate that the main motivation for Trump to emphasize it now is distraction.

But to be fair, are there not many preaching that the whole “Russia Thing” has the higher goal of shining a light on all forms of foreign involvement in US elections? For all parties involved?

As such, should we not also pay attention to Democratic wrongdoing as well as Republican? If not wearing partisan blinders, that is.
Click to expand...

There is rather a big difference in the two.

In the Democrats situation, they were approached by a US Company who has started doing opposition research for a Republican, and were asked if they wanted to take it over and continue. They agreed, and the research was done for the US Company by a sub-contractor who happened to be British and claims that he never actually talked with any the officials of any governments to get the information.

In the Republican's case, we have direct contact between Russian Government Officials and those both representing and claiming to be representing the Russian Government, and people working directly on the Campaign and being involved in high up positions in the campaign.
 
Fast Eddie B said:
I was actually referring to the shenanigans that may have partially disenfranchised Democratic Primary voters, weighting the process in favor of one candidate over the other.
Click to expand...

Except that other than in the fevered minds of the trumpkins and bernie-bros, there is exactly zero evidence that any such disenfranchisement happened.
 
Last edited:
Fast Eddie B said:
I was actually referring to the shenanigans that may have partially disenfranchised Democratic Primary voters, weighting the process in favor of one candidate over the other.
Click to expand...

Maybe we should look into it, if you define "we" as democrats who are upset at the hyjacking of our party. As a democrat I don't personally care as I'm satisfied that whatever happened was within the norm, but I can understand how others may feel differently.

I don't see why the government or anyone who is not a member of the democratic party should care.
 
Fast Eddie B said:
I would have thought Democrats might be annoyed that the process of selecting their candidate was tainted. Especially the Bernie supporters.

I personally don’t care one whit.
Click to expand...
Did you know that Bernie is not a Democrat, he's an independent?

Sent from my LG-LS997 using Tapatalk
 
Fast Eddie B said:
I would have thought Democrats might be annoyed that the process of selecting their candidate was tainted. Especially the Bernie supporters.

I personally don’t care one whit.
Click to expand...

I'm sure there are. But I'm in your camp. Don't really care.
Either Bernie or Clinton would have been fine. A far cry better than the juvenile in there now.
 
Bob001 said:
Clinton lost the election, and the multiple dysfunctions in her campaign have been widely reported. Wouldn't the observations of someone who was at the center of it carry some weight?
Click to expand...
Yes. It would carry more weight if Brazile wasn't complicit herself.
 
Last edited:
She still not done yet?

"Yuck. Look at all those maggots crawling around in that Trump administration. We need to pour gas on that and light it up."

"Yabbut, look at this black roasted thing we found over here. All burned up by Republican phosphorus and Russian napalm. Bring that gas over here."
 
Childlike Empress said:
It isn't even cute how thin-skinned you lot are about the continuation of talking about Killary. It's outright revealing.
Click to expand...

Hey, if I say something stupid and false about something, people correct me! They must be thin-skinned!

I love that you're still using "Killary". It's outright revealing of exactly the sort of propaganda you're willing to accept without question.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom