Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Better check under your bed tonight. Hillary might be under there.


And check the smoke detector. The LED safety light might have been replaced by a webcam from one of Hill's Shills™.

Interesting, were you intending to respond to my post, because that literally has nothing to do with what I posted about the disclosure this week that the DNC rigged the 2016 primary....

Or perhaps that was the point? Very "clever"!
 
Surely it’s of concern if a large portion of the Democratic Party was denied the fair opportunity for their candidate of choice to be selected as their the nominee.

It may have just been an internal Democratic Party affair, but still had national implications.
 
To what degree was that clause honored and enforced? The ex-DNC chair seems to think "not so much."

The person that lied about Bernie being offered a similar fundraising agreement and the contents of the memo? Maybe she's just stirring up controversy to sell her book.
 
The person that lied about Bernie being offered a similar fundraising agreement and the contents of the memo? Maybe she's just stirring up controversy to sell her book.

What's the lie? I wouldn't assume that Clinton supporters are sources of objective truth either.
 
What's the lie? I wouldn't assume that Clinton supporters are sources of objective truth either.

She lied about Bernie not getting a similar fundraising deal and the contents of the memo. Bernie's camp admitting they signed the deal but didn't use it and the actual memo has come out showing the fundraising was regarding the GE not the primaries. She's flogging a book and wanted attention for it.
 
She lied about Bernie not getting a similar fundraising deal and the contents of the memo. Bernie's camp admitting they signed the deal but didn't use it and the actual memo has come out showing the fundraising was regarding the GE not the primaries. She's flogging a book and wanted attention for it.

"We had no addendum like this, no memorandum, no agreement like this," said Mark Longabaugh, the Sanders campaign's chief liaison to the DNC. "They basically came to us and said, here's the agreement, take it or leave it."

Is it Rigged? "Yes." Elizabeth Warren. Warren flogging a book?

/It is amazing how people simply regurgitate Clinton talking points. It is almost as if they don't know she is done, and want to continue sprinkling perfume on her bloated corrupt corpse while she takes down the whole DNC
 
"We had no addendum like this, no memorandum, no agreement like this," said Mark Longabaugh, the Sanders campaign's chief liaison to the DNC. "They basically came to us and said, here's the agreement, take it or leave it."

Is it Rigged? "Yes." Elizabeth Warren. Warren flogging a book?

/It is amazing how people simply regurgitate Clinton talking points. It is almost as if they don't know she is done, and want to continue sprinkling perfume on her bloated corrupt corpse while she takes down the whole DNC

But you really, really wish you had a real scandal, don't you. Sorry, but this one's a dud.
 
... It is almost as if they don't know she is done, and want to continue sprinkling perfume on her bloated corrupt corpse while she takes down the whole DNC


Now you're just messin' with us. I guess that it would look that way if you ignored all the previous posters telling you that she is, in fact, done and then asking you why you keep bringing her up?
 
It has nothing to do with being thin skinned, it has to do with this being a pointless distraction. Why is there any reason to keep bringing up a has been politician that has quit politics after losing to a idiot like Trump? I mean seriously, what is the point in it? I don't recall people still bringing up McCain or Kerry or Romney nearly a year after their loses, heck even Gore had been allowed to toddle off into the sunset by now, and that was a very controversial Election.

Hillary is done, she lost, she's quit politics, it's over, you're beating a dead horse. Stop wasting your time and get involved in something that is actually important.

She's not wasing her time, she's doing her job. Her job is to muddy the waters of any political discussion.
 
Brazile says she considered dumping Clinton:
Former Democratic National Committee head Donna Brazile writes in a new book that she seriously contemplated replacing Hillary Clinton as the party’s 2016 presidential nominee with then-Vice President Biden in the aftermath of Clinton’s fainting spell, in part because Clinton’s campaign was “anemic” and had taken on “the odor of failure.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli..._hp-top-table-main_donna-204pm:homepage/story
 
DNC rules do not give the chair the authority to unilaterally replace a nominee. Delegates would reconvene if there was a vacancy. On the other hand, this is a nice hook to sell books to the people that wish Biden would have run.

The story says:
If a nominee became disabled, she explains, the party chair would oversee a complicated process of filling the vacancy that would include a meeting of the full DNC.

She doesn't claim she could do it herself, only that she could start the process.
 
Last edited:
Feels like Brazile is just making **** up at this point.

Clinton lost the election, and the multiple dysfunctions in her campaign have been widely reported. Wouldn't the observations of someone who was at the center of it carry some weight?
 
The story says:


She doesn't claim she could do it herself, only that she could start the process.

You skipped over, "If a nominee became disabled." Was she threatening to harm Clinton? This is just more self serving lies to sell the book.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom