Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

[Belz...]

A bit touchy aren't you, I understand why, but I only asked if people had seen it.

Did you even read the post, I wonder...

 

[Craig B]

The findings meeting (that's not the right term) for the Trump rape case is a couple weeks after too. Sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander, let's get this crap all out in the open Monday. All of it.

I predict a Nixon phenomenon if Trump wins. The "crap" will come out bit by bit until he is destroyed.

 

[eerok]

I predict a Nixon phenomenon if Trump wins. The "crap" will come out bit by bit until he is destroyed.

There's been a lot of Trump crap already. More than enough, I would've thought, but America seems determined to go nuts this election cycle.

Hillary Clinton will likely win, but I'm not sure the political landscape will ever be the same. The best scenario would be if the GOP seriously reassessed WTF they stand for, but there's always a chance that the crazy will double down, because that's what crazy likes to do.

Almost as remarkable as the unsuitability of Trump as a presidential candidate is the fervent demonizing of Clinton, who's fairly boring and centrist.

Politics loves drama.

 

[NoahFence]

I predict a Nixon phenomenon if Trump wins. The "crap" will come out bit by bit until he is destroyed.

As opposed to the bit by bit during the election?

 

[Tero]

We still need some equivalent of Blue Dress for Trump.
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/clinton/lewinskydress.jpg

 

[Belz...]

We still need some equivalent of Blue Dress for Trump.
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/clinton/lewinskydress.jpg

How about a dyed version of this:

http://www.biggerbids.com/members/images/7040/public/2141829_straight-jacket.jpg

 

[Fast Eddie B]

Lots of outrage from the left about this:

Warranted, but any chance they're just mad they didn't think of it first?

 

[Belz...]

Why outrage?

 

[NoahFence]

Lots of outrage from the left about this:

[qimg]https://c7.staticflickr.com/6/5489/30139781334_c2a7e3d136.jpg[/qimg]

Warranted, but any chance they're just mad they didn't think of it first?

I don't think the left is nearly as dishonest and desperate as the right.

 

[NoahFence]

Why outrage?

It's fake. You can't vote by text.

 

[Belz...]

It's fake. You can't vote by text.

No, of course, but it's not the first time people try to con others with stuff like this.

 

[NoahFence]

No, of course, but it's not the first time people try to con others with stuff like this.

Yes, hence the outrage.

 

[Belz...]

Gee, how mad must they get at all those viagra e-mails they get!

 

[Skeptic Tank]

Any thoughts on Spirit Cooking?

https://www.conservativeoutfitters.com/blogs/news/wikileaks-john-podestas-satanic-dinner-warning-graphic-content

 

[wareyin]

Why outrage?

Because it's a scam being used to suppress the real vote. It's the same as the idiotic thing going around saying Reps vote on Nov 8 while Dems must wait til Nov 9.


eta: ninja'd!

 

[NoahFence]

Gee, how mad must they get at all those viagra e-mails they get!

Viagra commercials don't sway voters. This voting thing is pretty important, yes?

 

[Belz...]

Viagra commercials don't sway voters. This voting thing is pretty important, yes?

Yeah, well, people are going to do what people do. Now, if it's the GOP doing this, directly or indirectly, sure, but otherwise, that's the sort of stuff we see all the time. It's bad, but what do you want to do about it?

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

Gee, how mad must they get at all those viagra e-mails they get!

Viagra ads do not violate federal campaign laws by impersonation of another product.

Multiple laws were broken.

 

[Jrrarglblarg]

Yeah, well, people are going to do what people do. Now, if it's the GOP doing this, directly or indirectly, sure, but otherwise, that's the sort of stuff we see all the time. It's bad, but what do you want to do about it?

No, this is not what "we see all the time." This is very very illegal in several categories, all Federal.

 

[Belz...]

No, this is not what "we see all the time." This is very very illegal in several categories, all Federal.

I don't think the two are mutually-exclusive.