Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.
Skeptic Ginger said:
That changes things a bit, especially this part:
Click to expand...

Think Progress. An actual bona fide propaganda outfit started by Clinton, run by her cronies reports that some Clinton stooge ("a Strategic communications consultant working miracles on a shoestring")filed a "complaint" and got back what appears to be a form letter (neither of which we are allowed to see) and they fabricate an article claiming that there is a substantive investigation going on because of it.

I have to think that a skeptic would be dubious of any lie that a garbage outfit like Think Progress is trying to sell.
 
The Big Dog said:
Think Progress. An actual bona fide propaganda outfit started by Clinton, run by her cronies reports that some Clinton stooge ("a Strategic communications consultant working miracles on a shoestring")filed a "complaint" and got back what appears to be a form letter (neither of which we are allowed to see) and they fabricate an article claiming that there is a substantive investigation going on because of it.

I have to think that a skeptic would be dubious of any lie that a garbage outfit like Think Progress is trying to sell.
Click to expand...

Awe, someone who swallows Russian propaganda and spews FOX News talking points is trying to paint "the other side" as tainted! How cute, in a clumsily amateurish way.
 
The Big Dog said:
Think Progress. An actual bona fide propaganda outfit started by Clinton, run by her cronies reports that some Clinton stooge ("a Strategic communications consultant working miracles on a shoestring")filed a "complaint" and got back what appears to be a form letter (neither of which we are allowed to see) and they fabricate an article claiming that there is a substantive investigation going on because of it.

I have to think that a skeptic would be dubious of any lie that a garbage outfit like Think Progress is trying to sell.
Click to expand...

The irony is staggering. Have you had a look at some of the "sources" you have linked to in this thread?
 
Argumemnon said:
You mean, beyond checking that they are on his side?
Click to expand...

That's what TBD thinks that skepticism is: if it's negative against the Clintons, it's true! (yay) If it's positive against the Clintons, or refutes the negative, it's false! (yay)

Can't you skeptics see that? That's what skepticism is all about.
 
The Big Dog said:
Think Progress. An actual bona fide propaganda outfit started by Clinton, run by her cronies reports that some Clinton stooge ("a Strategic communications consultant working miracles on a shoestring")filed a "complaint" and got back what appears to be a form letter (neither of which we are allowed to see) and they fabricate an article claiming that there is a substantive investigation going on because of it.

I have to think that a skeptic would be dubious of any lie that a garbage outfit like Think Progress is trying to sell.
Click to expand...

Agreed, wouldn't be any different if it came from the DNC.
 
lionking said:
The irony is staggering. Have you had a look at some of the "sources" you have linked to in this thread?
Click to expand...

Tu quoque fallacies ROCK!

Were the other sources run by Clinton transition team members too, like think *********** progress is?

Anyway, some schmuck files a complaint and gets a form letter and so called skeptics rush into defend their propaganda outlet.

Sad.
 
Shalamar said:
That's what TBD thinks that skepticism is: if it's negative against the Clintons, it's true! (yay) If it's positive against the Clintons, or refutes the negative, it's false! (yay)

Can't you skeptics see that? That's what skepticism is all about.
Click to expand...

Lolz, I bet none of your skeptical pals are going to point out what a pathetic strawman this is.

Think progress/media matters actual propaganda outfits
 
Shalamar said:
That's what TBD thinks that skepticism is: if it's negative against the Clintons, it's true! (yay) If it's positive against the Clintons, or refutes the negative, it's false! (yay)

Can't you skeptics see that? That's what skepticism is all about.
Click to expand...
Yeah, when a "skeptic" uncritically links to bizpac review, the whines about think progress ring awfully hollow.
 
The Big Dog said:
Hmmm, he did not feel like he was wasting his time when he posted that comment about me, I am sure he will share a few seconds of his time to explain it.

Thanks, tho, for "checking" in.
Click to expand...

Since you're so anxious, I'll throw you a bone: what Shalamar did was to mock your posting style. That isn't a strawman, specially since he didn't have to add the exaggeration to do the mocking. In the end he ysed a sarcastic quip, also not a strawman.

Hope you have learned something.
 
Shalamar said:
That's what TBD thinks that skepticism is: if it's negative against the Clintons, it's true! (yay) If it's positive against the Clintons, or refutes the negative, it's false! (yay)

Can't you skeptics see that? That's what skepticism is all about.
Click to expand...

Megalodon said:
Since you're so anxious, I'll throw you a bone: what Shalamar did was to mock your posting style. That isn't a strawman, specially since he didn't have to add the exaggeration to do the mocking. In the end he ysed a sarcastic quip, also not a strawman.

Hope you have learned something.
Click to expand...

Bwhahahahah!!!!!!

Oh MERCY!

Fantastic!
 
I see, you are not aware of how ridiculous your sources (or your dismissal of othets's sources) actually are. A real case study...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom