Hillary Clinton is Done: part 4

[WilliamSeger]

Why would it be limited to Trump supporters, indeed it is OBVIOUS that Bourdain is nothing at all of the sort.

Did you read the article?

Yep, every word, searching in vain for where he "nails Hillary's hide to the wall." And yup, it was OBVIOUS that Bourdain is no Trump supporter when he said that if he was asked to prepare a state dinner for Trump and Kim Jong Un, he would serve hemlock. It's also OBVIOUS why you dodged my question.

 

[The Big Dog]

Yep, every word, searching in vain for where he "nails Hillary's hide to the wall." And yup, it was OBVIOUS that Bourdain is no Trump supporter when he said that if he was asked to prepare a state dinner for Trump and Kim Jong Un, he would serve hemlock. It's also OBVIOUS why you dodged my question.

Yes, your question was totally nonsensical, that indeed was obvious.

It is fine, you don't see where he figuratively nailed her hide to the wall, nor want to address the actual substance of the article, nor answer why she hangs out with predators, etc.

You want to change the subject to "Trump supporters" for reasons that are indeed, obvious.

It is fine.

 

[Belz...]

My subsequent posts were not directed to you, rather when I said have the last word, I was referring only to our isolated interaction on a particular subject

I don't believe you. You just can't help yourself.

The field is yours:

For this particular subject, I gather?

 

[WilliamSeger]

Yes, your question was totally nonsensical, that indeed was obvious.

It is fine, you don't see where he figuratively nailed her hide to the wall, nor want to address the actual substance of the article, nor answer why she hangs out with predators, etc.

You want to change the subject to "Trump supporters" for reasons that are indeed, obvious.

It is fine.

Well, I should hope it's obvious why people keep pointing out the hypocrisy of Trump supporters: it's pretty ludicrous. As for the "actual substance" of the article, Bourdain apparently thinks that Clinton was disingenuous to say she didn't know about Weinstein's behavior. Okay, but now you -- someone who voted for and still supports an unregistered sex offender who is also a sociopathic scam artist and actual pathological liar who tells self-serving lies on a daily basis -- presented that as a good reason we didn't elect her? That's... funny.

 

[The Big Dog]

Well, I should hope it's obvious why people keep pointing out the hypocrisy of Trump supporters: it's pretty ludicrous. As for the "actual substance" of the article, Bourdain apparently thinks that Clinton was disingenuous to say she didn't know about Weinstein's behavior. Okay, but now you -- someone who voted for and still supports an unregistered sex offender who is also a sociopathic scam artist and actual pathological liar who tells self-serving lies on a daily basis -- presented that as a good reason we didn't elect her? That's... funny.

Trump supporters? There was nothing in that article about trump supporters and indeed the article does indeed reflect hypocrisy of Hillary and her supporters.

It is yet another example of her supporting male super predators like Harvey and Bill Clinton.

I suspect that your desperate attempt to make it about a fellow forum member is as obvious as it is wrong.

 

[WilliamSeger]

Trump supporters? There was nothing in that article about trump supporters and indeed the article does indeed reflect hypocrisy of Hillary and her supporters.

It is yet another example of her supporting male super predators like Harvey and Bill Clinton.

I suspect that your desperate attempt to make it about a fellow forum member is as obvious as it is wrong.

No, I was making it about your argument for why "Hillary Clinton is Done" and the abject failure of your theory to explain why Trump isn't done. But okay, we can make it about the Fox News site that you linked to, if you care to defend their hypocrisy. They didn't seem to be so impressed with Bourdain's sensibilities when they ran this::

CNN host Anthony Bourdain says he would poison Trump if he had to cook for him

 

[The Big Dog]

No, I was making it about your argument for why "Hillary Clinton is Done" and the abject failure of your theory to explain why Trump isn't done. But okay, we can make it about the Fox News site that you linked to, if you care to defend their hypocrisy. They didn't seem to be so impressed with Bourdain's sensibilities when they ran this::

CNN host Anthony Bourdain says he would poison Trump if he had to cook for him

Well, in this thread we are discussing why Hillary Clinton lost and why she is done. One reason, as we have seen, is that even her supporters are appalled by her relationship with predatory males and her insipid explanation and belated attempt to distance herself from him.

As far as the attempt to derail the topic, and tu quoque fallacies perhaps you will wish to start a new thread?

 

[Mycroft]

Please. Stop. Feeding.

I understand the impulse. I'm not saying I haven't done it myself. I'm only saying that right here, right now, there is nothing to be gained by throwing another tidbit.

 

[The Big Dog]

Because we, collectively, won't stop feeding the troll.

Please. Stop. Feeding.

I understand the impulse. I'm not saying I haven't done it myself. I'm only saying that right here, right now, there is nothing to be gained by throwing another tidbit.

 

[Fast Eddie B]

Another example of right-wingers keeping Hillary in the news:

 

[quadraginta]

Another example of right-wingers keeping Hillary in the news:

Because no one ever asks past Secretaries of State their opinion on current foreign policy.

 

[Belz...]

Please. Stop. Feeding.

Too late. If we stop feeding and release back into the wild after all this time, they lack the instict to feed themselves.

 

[quadraginta]

Too late. If we stop feeding and release back into the wild after all this time, they lack the instict to feed themselves.

You say this like it's a bad thing.

 

[Fast Eddie B]

Because no one ever asks past Secretaries of State their opinion on current foreign policy.

Granted.

It was more in response to those saying the only thing keeping her in the spotlight was right-wingers.

 

[The Big Dog]

Because no one ever asks past Secretaries of State their opinion on current foreign policy.

That was a part of the prerecorded time that CNN devoted to her and her excuses this week on Fareed Zakaria's show which I had already mentioned in the context of the Bourdain/Weinstein issues.

Why does CNN keep feeding that troll.

 

[LSSBB]

Granted.

It was more in response to those saying the only thing keeping her in the spotlight was right-wingers.

Last night's SNL could have been a better example.

 

[BobTheCoward]

That was a part of the prerecorded time that CNN devoted to her and her excuses this week on Fareed Zakaria's show which I had already mentioned in the context of the Bourdain/Weinstein issues.

Why does CNN keep feeding that troll.

Because she got almost 3 million more votes than the president and by almost any measure of it, her politics are more favored in this country than the current president's.

 

[The Big Dog]

Because she got almost 3 million more votes than the president and by almost any measure of it, her politics are more favored in this country than the current president's.

Interesting, so what you are saying is Hillary is not done and she will be an integral part of democrat party politics for the foreseeable future?

Trump 2020!

 

[BobTheCoward]

Interesting, so what you are saying is Hillary is not done and she will be an integral part of democrat party politics for the foreseeable future?

Trump 2020!

I didn't say any of that. My statement doesn't even touch on that.

 

[The Big Dog]

I didn't say any of that. My statement doesn't even touch on that.

Agree to disagree.