• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Hillary Clinton is Done: part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
And as for your memory of what you heard Clinton say, we know she said she voted to give Bush the authority to act if Saddam did not comply.

What she said has no relationship whatsoever to what she actually did

She lied, she is a liar.

She gave bush the authority to do what he did without restriction.

Cripes, don't people get sick of this spin?
 
What she said has no relationship whatsoever to what she actually did

She lied, she is a liar.

She gave bush the authority to do what he did without restriction.

Cripes, don't people get sick of this spin?

As did most of the GOP. So you shouldn't re-elect any of those guys, right?
 
While I see no choice, but to vote for her! I firmly agree that they are annoying!
Completely void of reason, when it comes to her foibles!

Which of her 'foibles' do you think caveman or empress has evidenced? I suspect you too are a Hilary 'defender' because so many of the accusations against her are nonsense.

She is not a war criminal, there is no good evidence to believe she's in poor health, and she's not doing anything nefarious by having old hardware destroyed (which is just good practice for anyone who is such a target for spying of various sorts).
 
Yep! Said it for years, I will not vote for anyone who voted for the second gulf war.

Can you say the same? Make the Commitment!

Edited by kmortis: 
Removed to comply with Rule 12
But of course we DO KNOW that Trump supported the war. Will you give him your vote?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Which of her 'foibles' do you think caveman or empress has evidenced? I suspect you too are a Hilary 'defender' because so many of the accusations against her are nonsense.

She is not a war criminal, there is no good evidence to believe she's in poor health, and she's not doing anything nefarious by having old hardware destroyed (which is just good practice for anyone who is such a target for spying of various sorts).


I think it was posted already in this thread but it can't hurt that you actually spend a couple of minutes to do something about the obviously clueless base of generic propaganda bla-bla you think is enough to justify participation in this thread. You remember the Haitians demonstrating in front of the DNC convention? Didn't think so. Pay attention, this is not the vast right-wing conspiracy speaking:

 
I think it was posted already in this thread but it can't hurt that you actually spend a couple of minutes to do something about the obviously clueless base of generic propaganda bla-bla you think is enough to justify participation in this thread. You remember the Haitians demonstrating in front of the DNC convention? Didn't think so. Pay attention, this is not the vast right-wing conspiracy speaking:


Twenty seven minutes? No. Make your accusation and what evidence you find compelling. I'm not searching that without you making a claim to hold you to later.

I'm more interested in what Dog Town believes has been evidenced.
 
Another 20 or so posts have been moved to AAH. Please focus on the issues and not the character of other posters. Further mod action in this thread will be pleasant for nobody. Thank you.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Loss Leader

I can think of no stronger endorsement of Hillary than pointing out the nature and quality of the enemies she attracts.

Missed this on the previous page. My bad. Not a productive line of discussion, no matter how valid the point is.
 
Which of her 'foibles' do you think caveman or empress has evidenced? I suspect you too are a Hilary 'defender' because so many of the accusations against her are nonsense.

She is not a war criminal, there is no good evidence to believe she's in poor health, and she's not doing anything nefarious by having old hardware destroyed (which is just good practice for anyone who is such a target for spying of various sorts).
Perfect example!
 
As a political cartoon this is an abject failure. The cartoonist should look for a new line of work. Could you explain the point you think he is making?


Denying the obvious technical brilliance of the guy isn't very funny. Next time try to sharpen your pen when trying to waste somebody's time.
 
Twenty seven minutes? No. Make your accusation and what evidence you find compelling. I'm not searching that without you making a claim to hold you to later.


I'll add exactly what I want to this thread and your whining will be met with learning offers if you're lucky. Just trying to put the E into I'm with hEr
 
Perfect example!

You don't have an answer besides to deflect? Surely you had a foible or two in mind. I know I have some criticisms of Hillary, but they are simply not the ridiculous stuff that tends to be cited here, and is much more mundane.

Are you convinced by Empress's arguments that Hillary is desperately ill? Do you think she is a war criminal like caveman? I know it's difficult to admit if you're a 'Hillary defender' even if you find her distasteful.
 
I'll add exactly what I want to this thread and your whining will be met with learning offers if you're lucky. Just trying to put the E into I'm with hEr

You don't know what parts of the video you find compelling, you don't know what parts of that video are accusations you support, or you're unwilling to name them for whatever reason.

That's not educational in the least, at least on the topic.
 
While I see no choice, but to vote for her! I firmly agree that they are annoying!
Completely void of reason, when it comes to her foibles!

You know what they say about strange bedfellows? Look around at the company you're keeping and the other participants in the Let's Find a Daily Smear sweepstakes. I've referred to it as the Molotov/von Ribbentrop pact, redux. It will not end well if your only goal is "Get Her!", because getting her, with the BIG get, means defeating her. And that gives you campfire lefties a POTUS who is the most reprehensible prominent US politician since George Wallace.

It's >Labor Day. The primaries and the convention are over. Continuing to fight against the results is not going to reverse them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom