Hillary Clinton is Done: part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hillary's tainted money from foreign governments won't rescue her sinking campaign -- even when spent at a whopping 40-to-1 ratio. The woman is a choke artist, and she'll drag a good many Democrats down with her in a lopsided and humiliating defeat come November.
Why do have to lie to make your "point"?

Her campaign hasn't got any money from foreign governments. While we know for a fact that your Cheeto Fuhrer has solicited money from members of foreign governments. Something you hypocritically give zero ***** about.
 
Excellent point. I would say that Hillary is no more dishonest and corrupt than Rep. Corrine Brown, or former Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr., or Rep. Alcee Hastings, or former Gov. Rod Blagojevich.
And you're going to vote for Donald Trump, easily to most dishonest candidate ever while at the same time laughably pretending that you care about honestly, aren't you?
 
The Kimberly-Clark Corporation, who manufactures 'Depends Adult Diapers', has reportedly ramped up production in anticipation of the upcoming election. Hillary and her gal pals are excepted to set record demands for the product -- considerably higher than their heretofore normal daily usage.

This is close to the most sexist post in a thread redolent of such posts. Well done.
 
And you're going to vote for Donald Trump, easily to most dishonest candidate ever while at the same time laughably pretending that you care about honestly, aren't you?

Well, he did call this back two election cycles ago..... "Sarah Palin is the future of the Republican Party". That has come to fruition. One would have thought it impossible to come up with a more repulsive candidate than Caribou Barbie, but the GOP has outdone themselves.
 
So, Clinton is going to push for an amendment to allow her government to punish people whose only crime was advertising a film about her.
 
Excellent point. I would say that Hillary is no more dishonest and corrupt than Rep. Corrine Brown, or former Rep. Jesse Jackson, Jr., or Rep. Alcee Hastings, or former Gov. Rod Blagojevich.

So you, in fact, cannot demonstrate that she is more dishonest or corrupt than any regular politician.
 
Hillary Clinton and her problem with personal honesty

Clinton's persistent problems with personal honesty have brought her face to face with three more criminal investigations. One is for public corruption. The second is for perjury. And the third is for misleading Congress.

The public corruption investigation has been underway for a few months. The allegations are that she exercised the powers of her office as secretary of state to enrich her husband and herself.

The second investigation Clinton faces is for perjury. This arises out of a Freedom of Information Act civil lawsuit during which she swore in writing and under oath, citing the phrase "under penalty of perjury," that she surrendered all of her work-related emails to the State Department.

Finally, Clinton will most likely be confronted with charges of misleading Congress. She did this when she denied to the House Select Committee on Benghazi that she had sent or received emails via her home servers that contained state secrets.

Read more:
http://www.njherald.com/20160715/hillary-clinton-and-her-problem-with-personal-honesty (July 15, 2016)


The perjury and misleading Congress charges, even though they are both felonies, are tame in comparison to the public corruption allegations. It has been reported by Fox News that the FBI has been investigating the Clinton Foundation since the first of the year. When asked about the investigation, FBI Director James Comey pointedly refused to answer during his recent testimony before the House Oversight Committee: “I’m not going to comment on the existence or non-existence of any other investigations,” Comey responded.

It is the public corruption charges that carry the most severe and harshest penalties, including life in prison; even punishment by death.

The Clinton Foundation has taken in nearly $60 million in donations from unsavory foreign governments (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, et al); governments that have been accused of funding terrorism, persecuting homosexuals, and violating women's rights.


U.S. Code 18, Section 794 - Gathering or delivering defense information to aid foreign government:

"Whoever, with intent or reason to believe that it is to be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of a foreign nation, communicates, delivers, or transmits, or attempts to communicate, deliver, or transmit, to any foreign government, or to any faction or party or military or naval force within a foreign country, whether recognized or unrecognized by the United States, or to any representative, officer, agent, employee, subject, or citizen thereof, either directly or indirectly, any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, note, instrument, appliance, or information relating to the national defense, shall be punished by death or by imprisonment for any term of years or for life."​
 
...The Clinton Foundation has taken in nearly $60 million in donations from unsavory foreign governments (Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Kuwait, et al); governments that have been accused of funding terrorism, persecuting homosexuals, and violating women's rights...

The fact is, over the years, Hillary Clinton has had a very small role in the Clinton Foundation.
As a legal matter, Clinton was not a member of the foundation’s board until 2013, after she left the administration. She was a board member in 2014 when the Saudis gave again, but that amount would be much less than $10 million. There were no Saudi donations while she was secretary. Politifact Link

Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar are nations that are allies of the U.S. There are accusations they have funded terrorism but all three deny it and there seems to be little in the way of evidence. Both Saudi Arabia and Kuwait have laws making it illegal for their private citizens to provide funds for known terrorist groups. The Washington Post reported:
Qatar has also come under criticism from some U.S. allies in the region that have accused it of supporting Hamas and other militant groups. Qatar has denied the allegations. Link

Algeria is another country that the Foundation has been criticized for accepting donations from. The Post reported a half-million dollar donation to the Foundation from Algeria in 2010 was for Haitian earthquake relief efforts and came unsolicited:
The [2010] donation from Algeria for Haiti earthquake relief, they said, arrived without notice within days of the 2010 quake and was distributed as direct aid to assist in relief. Algeria has not donated to the foundation since, officials said.

Clinton is aware of the problem and has been responsive.
“Algeria is one of those complicated countries that forces the United States to balance our interests and values,” Clinton wrote in her 2014 book, “Hard Choices.” She said that the country was an ally in combating terrorism but that “it also has a poor human rights record and a relatively closed economy.”

Other countries that have given money to the Clinton Foundation include Canada, Germany and Norway.

As for citing this federal law, "Gathering or delivering defense information to aid foreign government," that's not only a smear but a very un-smart one.
 
The fact is, over the years, Hillary Clinton has had a very small role in the Clinton Foundation.


Hillary Clinton is directly involved with the Clinton Foundation, as are her husband Bill, and daughter Chelsea.

newyorkguy said:
Saudi Arabia, Kuwait and Qatar are nations that are allies of the U.S. There are accusations they have funded terrorism but all three deny it ...


The Clinton's would have us believe that these unscrupulous foreign governments are really just philanthropists, who eagerly give millions to a charitable foundation that claims to support women's rights. Yet, these countries are known to be the worst-of-the-worst violators of civil rights with their long history of appalling treatment of women and homosexuals. Whether they are funding terrorism is still an open question.

newyorkguy said:
As for citing this federal law, "Gathering or delivering defense information to aid foreign government," that's not only a smear but a very un-smart one.


Fox News has reported that the FBI is currently investigating whether any donations made to the Clinton Foundation were in exchange for influence, favors, or passing along classified information while Hillary Clinton was serving as Secretary of State. Without doubt, the FBI will be looking for violations of U.S. Code 18, Section 794.
 
Last edited:
Hillary Clinton is directly involved with the Clinton Foundation, as are her husband Bill, and daughter Chelsea.




The Clinton's would have us believe that these unscrupulous foreign governments are really just philanthropists, who eagerly give millions to a charitable foundation that claims to support women's rights. Yet, these countries are known to be the worst-of-the-worst violators of civil rights with their long history of appalling treatment of women and homosexuals. Whether they are funding terrorism is still an open question.




Fox News has reported that the FBI is currently investigating whether any donations made to the Clinton Foundation were in exchange for influence, favors, or passing along classified information while Hillary Clinton was serving as Secretary of State. Without doubt, the FBI will be looking for violations of U.S. Code 18, Section 794.
Hey remember when you said that Hillary had no choice but to lie to the FBI or to plead the fifth, either of which would have disasterous consequences.

How did that prediction work out for you?

LMAO.
 
So you, in fact, cannot demonstrate that she is more dishonest or corrupt than any regular politician.

So, Your passively implied counter assertion is that those listed politicians are representative of "regular" politicians, then? That whatever shenanigans they each got up to is representative of politicians generally?


Care to back it up?
 
Hey remember when you said that Hillary had no choice but to lie to the FBI or to plead the fifth, either of which would have disasterous consequences.


FBI didn’t record Clinton interview, did not administer sworn oath

Hillary Clinton did not swear an oath to tell the truth before meeting with the FBI for three and a half hours last weekend, and the interview was not recorded, FBI Director James Comey told House lawmakers on Thursday.

The lack of a sworn oath does not remove the possibility of criminal penalties against Clinton if she lied to the FBI.

“Still a crime to lie to us," Comey told the House Oversight Committee. FBI policy is not to record interviews as part of its investigations.

Read more:
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/286849-fbi-didnt-record-clinton-interview-no-sworn-oath (July 7, 2016)​


Hillary wasn't even placed under oath; it was a voluntary interview with her team of lawyers present. And we don't know whether or not she lied to the FBI, since we don't have a transcript of the interview. Also, FBI Director James Comey didn't even bother to attend the interview, nor did he request that it be recorded.
 
FBI didn’t record Clinton interview, did not administer sworn oath

Hillary Clinton did not swear an oath to tell the truth before meeting with the FBI for three and a half hours last weekend, and the interview was not recorded, FBI Director James Comey told House lawmakers on Thursday.

The lack of a sworn oath does not remove the possibility of criminal penalties against Clinton if she lied to the FBI.

“Still a crime to lie to us," Comey told the House Oversight Committee. FBI policy is not to record interviews as part of its investigations.

Read more:
http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/286849-fbi-didnt-record-clinton-interview-no-sworn-oath (July 7, 2016)​


Hillary wasn't even placed under oath; it was a voluntary interview with her team of lawyers present. And we don't know whether or not she lied to the FBI, since we don't have a transcript of the interview. Also, FBI Director James Comey didn't even bother to attend the interview, nor did he request that it be recorded.
LMAO, thanks for further proving you have no idea what you are talking about.

Swear an oath? LMAO, the FBI never has subjects of interviews swear oaths. But it is still a crime to lie to them. Something Comey pointed out to one of the House morons during the hearing.

So what if Comey wasn't there for the interview. He has subordinates that do things like that. And they clearly did not believe that she lied to them.

Your prediction that Hillary had no choice to lie to the FBI or plead the fifth either with disasterous consequences to her turned out to be laughably, pathetically wrong.

Your credibility is negative. Deal with it.
 
Fox News has reported that the FBI is currently investigating whether any donations made to the Clinton Foundation were in exchange for influence, favors, or passing along classified information while Hillary Clinton was serving as Secretary of State. Without doubt, the FBI will be looking for violations of U.S. Code 18, Section 794.

There's your problem.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom