Maybe Von Ribbentrop isn't such a bad comparison to Clinton. I've watched about 10 minutes of her speech which was linked earlier in the thread. In it she describes the relation between Americans and other people. They (Americans) are, relatively speaking, on "a hill" - above the rest of us - but us, lower-humans, can receive their "shine"[*]. This shine is so exceptional that us lower-humans repeat that they truly are the greatest. Then she goes on about how great the army is, especially when killing people in the rest of the world. She doesn't mention the reason for these attacks on people in the rest of the world, but presumably it's to make sure that they also receive their shine properly.
So we have:
-Dividing people into "higher" and "lower" groups.
-Rampant nationalism.
-Rampant militarism.
-Documented history of killing the "lower" humans in large numbers.
-Her supporters claim "you are anti-American" when you oppose their hero, just like the NSDAP also called its opponents "anti-German".
Yeah, I'll go with the Von Ribbentrop-Clinton comparison
* Not sure if that's a reference to that
uranium. If Hillary's "passionate" supporters want to do something useful rather than repeating some silly false dilemma
ad nauseam, then maybe they should get her to state the coordinates of those depleted uranium rounds, because the rest of us would like to clean this up - you know, too many cancers and stuff like that. Clinton seems to do nothing but talk these days, surely she could fit in those coordinates somewhere in one of her speeches.
