Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Slings and Arrows said:
Really? Can you please provide a source that claimed the Clinton Foundation server had been breached by Russian hackers? As far as I know, this is breaking news.
Click to expand...

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...dation-said-to-be-breached-by-russian-hackers

...Bloomberg News reported Friday that the hackers who hit the DNC and Clinton’s campaign burrowed much further into the U.S. political system than initially thought, sweeping in law firms, lobbyists, consultants, foundations and policy groups ...
Click to expand...
 
Slings and Arrows said:
That article doesn't even mention the Clinton Foundation.
Click to expand...

Probably that's why the term "re-spin" was used . . . though I don't want to speak for anyone.

However, we now have definitive confirmation their server was breached.

Oh, and Julian Assange has reportedly been seen licking his chops.
Click to expand...

What outcome do you see from this breach/click-bait headline? Do you believe it will result in some criminal charges? If so, would you care to place another bet? Daddy needs some new running clothes!
 
RobRoy said:
Same odds if you're going to claim this breach will lead to Hillary being convicted for something.
Click to expand...


I'm not making any claims. The bet is simply a Crooked Hillary "indictment" -- not a conviction, an indictment.

If that is agreeable, I will bet another $20 at 10-to-1 odds. Which means you pay me $400 if there is an indictment; otherwise, I pay you $40.

Agreed?
 
Slings and Arrows said:
I'm not making any claims. The bet is simply a Crooked Hillary "indictment" -- not a conviction, an indictment.

If that is agreeable, I will bet another $20 at 10-to-1 odds. Which means you pay me $400 if there is an indictment; otherwise, I pay you $40.

Agreed?
Click to expand...

How's about you put YOUR money where your keyboarding fingers are. You smugly post link after link from reliable news sources like Pravda and Russia Today, smirking in your certainty that she's going down. Back it up.

How about you offer the sort of certainty odds the bookmakers would offer. You've got a sure thing. Risking a thousand bucks which you'll never have to pay to get back a guaranteed hundred? Child's play, right. You're at no risk, and can pocket a quick hundred. At the track we call this phenomenon "bridge jumpers". They wait for a 1:13 shot and mortgage their house to put fifty thousand on show. They make a tidy LITTLE profit. The time it doesn't work, though.... they head for the Queensborough Bridge and do a gainer one and a half with a twist into the icy East River.
 
Slings and Arrows, do you search Google every day to find things that you think will be bad for Hillary? Or maybe you have a Google alert set up?
 
Last edited:
I'm struggling to figure out why the files of a charity being hacked is supposed to be meaningful. Or are some people just jumping to conclusions that the charity was somehow crooked and doing illegal things?
 
tyr_13 said:
Hey, other Republicans, anyone have an issue with this? Anyone at all?

Because refusing to call out such ******** and racist talk is what has gotten you Trump as a candidate, and it might be time to start discouraging such things.
Click to expand...

It's not racist. He's mocking Elizabeth Warren's fraudulent claim to be a Native American, which she made to advance her academic career, not Native Americans per se. Personally, I prefer mocking her with the label "Fauxcohontas," which sums things up more concisely.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
I'm not making any claims. The bet is simply a Crooked Hillary "indictment" -- not a conviction, an indictment.

If that is agreeable, I will bet another $20 at 10-to-1 odds. Which means you pay me $400 if there is an indictment; otherwise, I pay you $40.

Agreed?
Click to expand...

From this hack of the Clinton Foundation, correct? That's still what we're talking about. Clinton Foundation hack leads to an indictment. I'm not certain why you have that in quotes. I do hope you're not trying to play fast and loose with terminology.
 
sunmaster14 said:
It's not racist. He's mocking Elizabeth Warren's fraudulent claim to be a Native American, which she made to advance her academic career, not Native Americans per se. Personally, I prefer mocking her with the label "Fauxcohontas," which sums things up more concisely.
Click to expand...

No, he isn't just doing that. Read his post again. He's mocking Hillary and Biden with racist ideas of Native Americans.

So far we have one other Republican defending such racist crap, and I hope it's just the others have stopped reading this thread. :(
 
Travis said:
I'm struggling to figure out why the files of a charity being hacked is supposed to be meaningful. Or are some people just jumping to conclusions that the charity was somehow crooked and doing illegal things?
Click to expand...
Yes. They think the charity is a front for the Clintons taking bribes from foreign governments or something.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom