Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
I notice that Shillaries are wetting themselves over Hillary's staff's tweet to trump.

This is a woman who can't use a pc, and emailed someone to email someone else to bring her an iced tea.

Lolz, I said it before, you cannot underestimate the ignorance of the American electorate.
 
16.5 said:
I notice that Shillaries are wetting themselves over Hillary's staff's tweet to trump.

This is a woman who can't use a pc, and emailed someone to email someone else to bring her an iced tea.

Lolz, I said it before, you cannot underestimate the ignorance of the American electorate.
Click to expand...
How mad are you going to be when she wins the election?

LOL
 
There is no shame or ethics in the White House

Barack Obama's spokesman described the FBI's probe into Hillary Clinton's classified email scandal as a 'criminal investigation' on Thursday, less than an hour after the president endorsed his embattled former secretary of state to succeed him.
Josh Earnest told reporters during a White House press briefing that Obama was committed to keeping his hands off the investigation, trusting career investigators and prosecutors to follow evidence wherever it leads.

'That's what their responsibility is,' Earnest said. 'And that's why the president, when discussing this issue in each stage, has reiterated his commitment to this principle that any criminal investigation should be conducted independent of any sort of political interference.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ans-day-Obama-endorses-her.html#ixzz4B8nr6zdG
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 
Reheat said:
Barack Obama's spokesman described the FBI's probe into Hillary Clinton's classified email scandal as a 'criminal investigation' on Thursday, less than an hour after the president endorsed his embattled former secretary of state to succeed him.
Josh Earnest told reporters during a White House press briefing that Obama was committed to keeping his hands off the investigation, trusting career investigators and prosecutors to follow evidence wherever it leads.

'That's what their responsibility is,' Earnest said. 'And that's why the president, when discussing this issue in each stage, has reiterated his commitment to this principle that any criminal investigation should be conducted independent of any sort of political interference.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ans-day-Obama-endorses-her.html#ixzz4B8nr6zdG
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Click to expand...
Regardless of the Press Sec. fumbled words or lack of clarity, or regardless of the misinterpretation of his words, The FBI has officially announced they are investigating the extent confidential information might be located. Clinton is not the direct focus of the investigation.

This was the actual comment:
“And that’s why the President, when discussing this issue in each stage has reiterated his commitment to this principle that any criminal investigation should be conducted independent of any sort of political interference and that people should be treated the same way before the law regardless of their political influence, regardless of their political party, regardless of their political stature and regardless of what political figure has endorsed them,” Earnest said.
Click to expand...
Do you see the "criminal investigation of Clinton" in that statement? It's a general comment that Obama is not interfering.

Here are the facts:
In July 2015, the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community sent what is called a security referral to members of the executive branch. A security referral is essentially a notification that classified information might exist in a location outside of the government’s possession. In this case, the location was Clinton’s private email server....

Describing the inquiry, FBI Director James Comey told Congress in October 2015, "The FBI is working on a referral given to us by inspectors general in connection with former Sec. Clinton’s use of a private email server."...

... The FBI is conducting a general inquiry into the security of Clinton’s private email server. But law enforcement officials have said Clinton herself is not the target of the inquiry, and it is not a full-blown criminal investigation.
Click to expand...

Of course if you tell a lie enough times.... and certainly the lie the FBI has undertaken a criminal investigation of Clinton has been repeated enough times.
 
Skeptic Ginger said:
Of course if you tell a lie enough times.... and certainly the lie the FBI has undertaken a criminal investigation of Clinton has been repeated enough times.
Click to expand...

Someone earlier commented that you don't know jack **** about IT. Well, there's a few other thing you don't know jack **** about too.

The function of the FBI as the chief Law Enforcement Agency in the USA is to conduct criminal investigations. That's what they do.

The criminal investigation began with a referral by two Intelligence Community Inspectors General (IG) after finding Top Secret material on Clinton's server among her emails. That material was not confidential, it was Top Secret. (Words have meaning and Confidential is a subset of Classified Material.) In that it was on a private server not under Government control it is therefore potentially criminal, in that it is a violation of the espionage act (referenced many time in these threads, but which you'd like to ignore). Got it yet?

The FBI does not do security reviews, nor do they conduct investigations of someone who breaks work place rules. They do Criminal Investigations period.

You keep repeating the lies that Clinton and her campaign are trying to sell, which is the true lie and unless you're dumb as a rock you ought to understand that by now.

This is not the first time Obama has surreptitiously attempted to influence a criminal investigation. He commented on the Travon Martin case by saying he could have been his son. He commented on the Ferguson case, as well. AND, more importantly, he said there was not a scintilla of evidence that the IRS did anything wrong. All of these were ongoing Criminal cases and he damned well knew they were criminal and ongoing.

In all of these cases, his attempt to influence them by commenting were unethical and depending on the outcome would be solid grounds for appeal by a defendant or the prosecution because of that influence.

That's wrong, yet you're defending it, just like defending Clinton and attempting to minimize and distort the FACT that she is very involved in an ongoing current Criminal Investigation the outcome of which is yet to be determined.
 
Last edited:
Reheat said:
Someone earlier commented that you don't know jack **** about IT. Well, there's a few other thing you don't know jack **** about too.

The function of the FBI as the chief Law Enforcement Agency in the USA is to conduct criminal investigations. That's what they do.

The criminal investigation began with a referral by two Intelligence Community Inspectors General (IG) after finding Top Secret material on Clinton's server among her emails. That material was not confidential, it was Top Secret. (Words have meaning and Confidential is a subset of Classified Material.) In that it was on a private server not under Government control it is therefore potentially criminal, in that it is a violation of the espionage act (referenced many time in these threads, but which you'd like to ignore). Got it yet?

The FBI does not do security reviews, nor do they conduct investigations of someone who breaks work place rules. They do Criminal Investigations period.

You keep repeating the lies that Clinton and her campaign are trying to sell, which is the true lie and unless you're dumb as a rock you ought to understand that by now.

This is not the first time Obama has surreptitiously attempted to influence a criminal investigation. He commented on the Travon Martin case by saying he could have been his son. He commented on the Ferguson case, as well. AND, more importantly, he said there was not a scintilla of evidence that the IRS did anything wrong. All of these were ongoing Criminal cases and he damned well knew they were criminal and ongoing.

In all of these cases, his attempt to influence them by commenting were unethical and depending on the outcome would be solid grounds for appeal by a defendant or the prosecution because of that influence.

That's wrong, yet you're defending it, just like defending Clinton and attempting to minimize and distort the FACT that she is very involved in an ongoing current Criminal Investigation the outcome of which is yet to be determined.
Click to expand...
How mad are you going to be when she is not indicted and is elected President of the United States?

Are you going to vote for the racist conman piece of garbage known as Donald Trump (I expect you to avoid answering)?

LOL
 
Reheat said:
The function of the FBI as the chief Law Enforcement Agency in the USA is to conduct criminal investigations. That's what they do.
Click to expand...


Crooked Hillary is the principal target of a criminal investigation.

Here are FBI Director James Comey's comments from May 11, 2016:

FBI Director Questions Hillary Clinton's Description of FBI Email Investigation

Even though Hillary Clinton has repeatedly described the FBI probe over her use of a private email server as a "security inquiry," FBI Director James Comey today questioned the use of that phrase.

“I don’t know what that means," Comey told reporters today in Washington, D.C. "We’re conducting an investigation. That’s the bureau’s business. That’s what we do."

One reporter noted that former Secretary of State Clinton often refers to it as a "security inquiry."

The word "investigation" -- "it’s in our name,” Comey responded. “And I’m not familiar with the term ‘security inquiry.’”

Read more:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-...ntons-description-fbi-email/story?id=39048269 (May 11, 2016)
Click to expand...
 
jhunter1163 said:
Also from your link:

"Sources have told ABC News that so far the investigation has found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing."
Click to expand...


Unidentified sources?

Well, James Comey has never said that "the investigation has found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing."

The only one's claiming that there is "no evidence of criminal wrongdoing" are the Crooked Hillary apologists.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Unidentified sources?

Well, James Comey has never said that "the investigation has found no evidence of criminal wrongdoing."

The only one's claiming that there is "no evidence of criminal wrongdoing" are the Crooked Hillary apologists.
Click to expand...
How mad will you be when she isn't indicted and wins the election?

LOL
 
Fox News Poll: Majority thinks Clinton is lying about emails

American voters think Hillary Clinton put national security at risk by mishandling classified emails -- and that she’s lying about it.

By a 60-27 percent margin, they think she’s lying about how her emails were handled while she was secretary of state, according to the latest Fox News national poll of registered voters.

And by 57-32 percent, voters say U.S. safety was at risk because of Clinton’s mishandling of national secrets.

Read more:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ity-thinks-clinton-is-lying-about-emails.html (June 10, 2016)
Click to expand...


New nickname: "Lyin' Crooked Hillary"
 
16.5 said:
I notice that Shillaries are wetting themselves over Hillary's staff's tweet to trump.

This is a woman who can't use a pc, and emailed someone to email someone else to bring her an iced tea.

Lolz, I said it before, you cannot underestimate the ignorance of the American electorate.
Click to expand...

It's pretty sad that what is quite clearly the best advice Trump has received since announcing his run comes from his opposition.
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Crooked Hillary is the principal target of a criminal investigation.
Here are FBI Director James Comey's comments from May 11, 2016:
Click to expand...

Can you quote where in that article Comey said "criminal investigation" , or "principal target" , because I don't see it.

Couldn't be that you simply made that part up, could it ?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom