newyorkguy
Penultimate Amazing
And yet you posted a blatantly fraudulent source??? Try again. We're not that stupid.
I was not at all aware the site or the quote was blatantly false. If it was I apologize.
And yet you posted a blatantly fraudulent source??? Try again. We're not that stupid.
I was not at all aware the site or the quote was blatantly false. If it was I apologize.
I was not at all aware the site or the quote was blatantly false. If it was I apologize.
Some 46 per cent of likely voters said they supported Mrs Clinton, while 35 per cent said they supported Mr Trump, and another 19 per cent said they would not support either, according to the survey of 1421 people conducted between May 30 and June 3.
Clinton's unfavorable/favorable rating now exceeds 20 points in multiple polls: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/clinton_favorableunfavorable-1131.html
She's only a few points behind Trump now. What a likable gal!
That poll was a month ago, why are you saying, "now"?
LOL, no it's not. You can't just make **** up here and not get called on it.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbsnyt-poll-how-do-voters-view-donald-trump-and-hillary-clinton/
Hillary opens a double digit lead over Trump:
http://www.theage.com.au/world/us-e...t-lead-over-donald-trump-20160604-gpbk8p.html
I wait for the usual suspects to dismiss this poll.
The RCP average spread on Trump vs Clinton is 1.5 points:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...s/general_election_trump_vs_clinton-5491.html
Until we get more data, the one you linked seems to be an outlier.
Nonsense. It's a proper poll, and shows Hillary has re-taken the large lead she previously had.
No, as of right now it's an outlier:
3
: a statistical observation that is markedly different in value from the others of the sample
I know what an outlier is. I also know denial when I see it.
I know what an outlier is. I also know denial when I see it.
I know what an outlier is. I also know denial when I see it.
LOL, no it's not. You can't just make **** up here and not get called on it.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbsnyt-poll-how-do-voters-view-donald-trump-and-hillary-clinton/
May 19, 2016, 6:30 PM
Skeptic Ginger said:LOL, no it's not. You can't just make **** up here and not get called on it.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbsnyt-poll-how-do-voters-view-donald-trump-and-hillary-clinton/
From your link:May 19, 2016, 6:30 PM
But regardless, unfavorable didn't translate into losing the nomination so apparently they are asking the wrong question.
By the way, Clinton won the Virgin Is caucus. And it looks good for her in Puerto Rico.
Sanders is at most, going for faux momentum in CA and there's a good chance he won't win.
"A record number of Californians registered to vote ahead of the June 7th primary, the California secretary of state's office reported Friday.
The bulk of the net increase resulted from a spike in Democratic Party registration, which increased by 491,818 registrations statewide."
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/...es-in-advance-of-primary-223903#ixzz4Af8axo1h
I don't think this bodes well for Hillary.
As of Saturday, more than 1.6 million California voters have already turned in their absentee ballots, according to the secretary of State’s office. That’s a faster pace than California voters turned in absentee ballots ahead of the 2014 general election; 10 days before that year’s November elections, just 1.3 million voters had bothered to cast their ballots.
Excitement over California’s June 7 primary is driven in part by a hotly contested race for Boxer’s Senate seat, after her decision to retire after 24 years in the Senate. Attorney General Kamala Harris (D) and Rep. Loretta Sanchez (D) lead a field of two-dozen candidates that includes two prominent former state Republican Party chairmen, Duf Sundheim and Tom Del Beccaro. The top two finishers advance to a general election regardless of party affiliation; most expect Harris and Sanchez to face off in November.
Yeah, May 19th, which, if my calculations are correct...
Is less than a month ago.