Axiom_Blade
Unregistered
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2006
- Messages
- 2,979
The transcript thing allows the Republicans to fuel the worst suspicions about Hillary among people who already don't trust her. The next step will be to circulate false transcripts, or real snippets taken out of context. But sooner or later she'll have to provide them, or someone else will (I'll bet the stenographer has a price in mind) and it will be a much bigger story than it should have been.
Hammering on the transcripts might not be a good idea. If they get released and there's really not much damning in them, then a lot of people might just decide that all criticism of Hillary is similarly baseless. Perhaps she's just biding her time, and then she'll release them and say, "See? Nothing here!"
As bad as? Trump is a disaster waiting to happen, a CTer, mentally disturbed, a liar, a hypocrite to the nth degree.
No way have I said as bad as, Trump is so much worse than Clinton it's hard to adequately describe.
Oddly enough, I watched one of the Republican debates, and I found myself agreeing with Trump a lot of the time. Against Carson, Cruz, and Rubio, he came off as a moderate. (I don't know about Kasich. I don't remember him saying much of anything.) I think that says more about the Republican Party than it does about Trump, though.
Trump and Clinton are polarizing figures, even within their own parties. (Somebody even made a website where you can pledge not to vote for Hillary.) I think the election would basically come down to people voting against Trump by voting Hillary, and people voting against Hillary by voting Trump. In other words, spite voting. A president, any president, who is elected primarily out of spite is troubling.

How can I get some of that? Lol.