Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
The allegation is that much of that money donated to the Hillary Victory Fund for down-ticket races is actually getting recycled back to the Clinton campaign, circumventing the intent if not the letter of campaign finance laws. And Politico is hardly the "blogosphere," especially when it cites an accounting report to the FEC:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/hillary-clinton-committee-raised-33-million-222044
http://www.salon.com/2016/04/19/a_m...t_democrats_shes_out_to_help_hillary_clinton/
I'm trying to figure this one out and this is what I see so far. People are taking how past money was divvied up and applying it to new funds recently raised.

Something's wrong with this picture.
 
Personally I would like to thank Bubba for entering the discussion. Bubba's thinking is simply a logical extension of the "logic" and "critical thinking" employed by many of the Sanders supporters. I support Sanders, but I'm embarrassed by and abhor the nonsense spewed by them.

If the best you can do is resort to that claptrap rather then articulate a rational argument to support your candidate, you are on the wrong forum.

Sad to see the more militant Sanders suporters regurgitating right wing nonsense about the Clintons that has been debunked time and time again.
Of course I have a basic prejudice aganst personality cults in politics,left or right.
 
Sad to see the more militant Sanders suporters regurgitating right wing nonsense about the Clintons that has been debunked time and time again.
And it's sad to see Hillary supporters taking the line that Democrats either support her, or are dupes of the vast right wing conspiracy.

And then wonder why the Sanders campaign is still even a thing, at this late a stage in the primary campaign.

Of course I have a basic prejudice aganst personality cults in politics,left or right.

Cool story, bro. B)
 
The allegation is that much of that money donated to the Hillary Victory Fund for down-ticket races is actually getting recycled back to the Clinton campaign, circumventing the intent if not the letter of campaign finance laws. And Politico is hardly the "blogosphere," especially when it cites an accounting report to the FEC:
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/hillary-clinton-committee-raised-33-million-222044
http://www.salon.com/2016/04/19/a_m...t_democrats_shes_out_to_help_hillary_clinton/


George Clooney should have kept his mouth shut. His appearance on Meet The Press where he stated that the "overwhelming majority" of funds raised were going to down-ticket races, all but guaranteed someone would check the validity of his claim.
 
Last edited:
Then there are the right-wingers who claim to be Bernie supporters...
Indeed.

But more important is the response you quoted. It could have been an opportunity to show my comments are wrong and show us an articulate endorsement. But no, instead, it's an example of how poor reading comprehension leads to ignorant comments. Specifically, I was not addressing the supporters themselves, but their tactics and comments.
 
Then there are the right-wingers who claim to be Bernie supporters...

That's the thing that so many Hillary suppports can't seem to grasp: It's not about the partisan divide. It's about being fed up with the establishment politics of both parties.

At this point, I actually believe Bernie Sanders would be better for the country than Donald Trump. I registered as a Democrat in my state this year, so that I could vote for him in our primary. I'll vote for him in the general election, if he somehow ends up on the ballot.

But I'd rather watch Donald Trump burn the world to the ground, than put up with another four years of corrupt establishment whores hacks like Hillary Clinton, or opportunistic evangelical douchebags like Ted Cruz.
 
That's the thing that so many Hillary suppports can't seem to grasp: It's not about the partisan divide. It's about being fed up with the establishment politics of both parties.

At this point, I actually believe Bernie Sanders would be better for the country than Donald Trump. I registered as a Democrat in my state this year, so that I could vote for him in our primary. I'll vote for him in the general election, if he somehow ends up on the ballot.

But I'd rather watch Donald Trump burn the world to the ground, than put up with another four years of corrupt establishment whores hacks like Hillary Clinton, or opportunistic evangelical douchebags like Ted Cruz.


A large portion of the electorate is disgusted with both parties, and will vote for either Sanders or Trump, if one or the other gets the nomination.
 
Personally I would like to thank Bubba for entering the discussion. Bubba's thinking is simply a logical extension of the "logic" and "critical thinking" employed by many of the Sanders supporters. I support Sanders, but I'm embarrassed by and abhor the nonsense spewed by them.

If the best you can do is resort to that claptrap rather then articulate a rational argument to support your candidate, you are on the wrong forum.

Indeed.

But more important is the response you quoted. It could have been an opportunity to show my comments are wrong and show us an articulate endorsement. But no, instead, it's an example of how poor reading comprehension leads to ignorant comments. Specifically, I was not addressing the supporters themselves, but their tactics and comments.

Indeed. Your comments about Bubba were indeed deep and profound.

Indeed.

:rolleyes:
 
A large portion of the electorate is disgusted with both parties, and will vote for either Sanders or Trump, if one or the other gets the nomination.

Evidence? :rolleyes:

Somehow I doubt Sanders Supporters want to see a GOP controlled Congress, President and SCOTUS.

Likewise Trump supporters are unlikely to vote socialist.
 
Evidence? :rolleyes:

Somehow I doubt Sanders Supporters want to see a GOP controlled Congress, President and SCOTUS.

Likewise Trump supporters are unlikely to vote socialist.


Both the Sanders and the Trump supporters loathe Clinton. Neither camp will be voting for "Crooked Hillary" -- her new nickname.
 
Last edited:
Both the Sanders and the Trump supporters loathe Clinton. Neither camp will be voting for "Crooked Hillary" -- her new nickname.

I believe I heard Cruz start a new name calling for Trump: Sleazy Trump.

So, Sleazy Trump, Lying Ted or Crooked Hillary. I suspect more people are tired of Jr High antics than you think.
 
Beats me how anyone can think Hillary is not a crook after seeing her change her alibis and stories on camera

I would see myself as a complete fool if I fell for her lies as some do.

BTW, None of the candidates impress me
 
Last edited:
A large portion of the electorate is disgusted with both parties, and will vote for either Sanders or Trump, if one or the other gets the nomination.

Exactly. The GOP is in the awkward position of having no clue what to do about the problem. The Democrat establishment is in the even worse position of not even understanding the problem exists.
 
Hillary

* Said she would not rule out nukes against Afghanistan & Pakistan.

* Almost always advocated the most aggressive actions considered.

* Advocated "obliterating them " (Iranians) with nukes.

*Should be in prison.
 
Both the Sanders and the Trump supporters loathe Clinton. Neither camp will be voting for "Crooked Hillary" -- her new nickname.

I'm a Sanders supporter, and I can assure you that I'd rather shoot myself in the face than see Drumpf president.
Hillary is so much more qualified it's not even funny.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom