Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Don said:
Interesting, from an energy industry site we get a different view



http://theamericanenergynews.com/energy-politics/hillary-clinton-money-fossil-fuel-companies

So either Russia Today slipped in a "don't" or the americaenergynews dropped it....
Click to expand...


Can you figure out what makes sense on your own our do you need help? Did the Sanders campaign accuse her of not taking money from the fossil fuel industry? ;):rolleyes:

But as it turned out - both dropped something quoting her little bullying of the activist. Her Entitledness doesn't even need two sentences to contradict herself, watch for yourself:

 
^ This is actually pretty fascinating to watch. She starts with her furious arrogance to formulate a sentence with a lie, catches herself maybe realizing that it's too obvious, starts again with the truth, then accuses the Sanders campaign of lying about something she just admitted was true. Pathological liar indeed, but now careful, backed into a corner.
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
Can you figure out what makes sense on your own our do you need help? Did the Sanders campaign accuse her of not taking money from the fossil fuel industry? ;):rolleyes:

But as it turned out - both dropped something quoting her little bullying of the activist. Her Entitledness doesn't even need two sentences to contradict herself, watch for yourself:

Click to expand...


The video states that The Clinton Foundation is in receipt of millions from the fossil fuel industry. That's interesting to know but is irrelevant as to whether or not the Clinton Campaign is in receipt of that money.
 
The Don said:
The video states that The Clinton Foundation is in receipt of millions from the fossil fuel industry. That's interesting to know but is irrelevant as to whether or not the Clinton Campaign is in receipt of that money.
Click to expand...

According to Greenpeace the Clinton Campaign received the money. According to the same source, the Sanders Campaign also did, if to a much lesser extent.
 
The accusation is absurd on its face. So-called oil and gas industry money includes donations of $200 or more from anybody who works in the industry (even some lowly employee of ExxonMobil, or perhaps a guy who owns a gas station), as well as lobbyists who have had one or more industry clients at one time or another (out of dozens, if not hundreds of clients potentially). The method of accounting makes the numbers completely meaningless. On top of that, even if the accounting were sensible, it would only tell you about correlation, not necessarily causality, let alone about any quid pro quos. For example, maybe Democrats in the oil and gas sector happen to be more anti-gun than pro-gun, and that's why they give more to Hillary than Bernie. Or perhaps (actually far more likely) it's because Hillary has been a viable candidate for longer, so there has been more opportunity for her to receive such donations.

The whole issue is a complete waste of time. I doubt it changes a material number of votes either. The only people who would care about such things have already made up their minds.
 
Hillary Humiliates Herself

"Native New Yorker"* and regular "straphanger" Hillary Clinton "takes" the "subway." I'm sure all those commuters LOVED the secret service all over the place.

http://gawker.com/the-big-question-at-the-center-of-hillary-clintons-subw-1769610774

*Born a Republican in Park Ridge Illinois, moved to Arkansas, emails aides to ask another aide to bring her a glass of iced tea.

She does not just think people are stupid, she is counting on it!
 
16.5 said:
"Native New Yorker"* and regular "straphanger" Hillary Clinton "takes" the "subway." I'm sure all those commuters LOVED the secret service all over the place.

http://gawker.com/the-big-question-at-the-center-of-hillary-clintons-subw-1769610774

*Born a Republican in Park Ridge Illinois, moved to Arkansas, emails aides to ask another aide to bring her a glass of iced tea.

She does not just think people are stupid, she is counting on it!
Click to expand...

She is a politician. This is their #1 operating principal (and it is largely correct). Seems pointless to criticize one politician for doing something that they all do.
 
jhunter1163 said:
I don't see how that's any worse than Sanders saying in the infamous Bad Interview that "you buy a token and you go on the subway" when tokens were eliminated in 2003.
Click to expand...

Because it is a staged stunt by one of the most sheltered people on the Planet and she STILL managed to **** the bed.

You don't really think that someone who wrote:

"Pls call Sarah and ask her if she can get me some iced tea."

Takes the subway do you?
 
Hillary Clinton Is Too Ambitious

Hillary Tries Too Hard
“Don’t destroy the Democratic Party to satisfy the secretary’s ambitions to become president of the United States,” Weaver said.

Hillary has been... an unimaginative pragmatist, a hope-dashing incrementalist, and a corporatist too beholden to the financial sector to ever regulate or reform it in the way that will be required of our next president.
Click to expand...
 
sunmaster14 said:
The accusation is absurd on its face. So-called oil and gas industry money includes donations of $200 or more from anybody who works in the industry (even some lowly employee of ExxonMobil, or perhaps a guy who owns a gas station), as well as lobbyists who have had one or more industry clients at one time or another (out of dozens, if not hundreds of clients potentially). The method of accounting makes the numbers completely meaningless. On top of that, even if the accounting were sensible, it would only tell you about correlation, not necessarily causality, let alone about any quid pro quos. For example, maybe Democrats in the oil and gas sector happen to be more anti-gun than pro-gun, and that's why they give more to Hillary than Bernie. Or perhaps (actually far more likely) it's because Hillary has been a viable candidate for longer, so there has been more opportunity for her to receive such donations.

The whole issue is a complete waste of time. I doubt it changes a material number of votes either. The only people who would care about such things have already made up their minds.
Click to expand...

It really must be National Beer Day, and I must have been celebrating pretty hard, because this is the second recent political post by sunmaster14 that I entirely agree with.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom