Hillary Clinton is Done: part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
BobTheCoward said:
They did not admit to it. You are using poor reading skills to conclude it is an admission.

After you have found the ghost written evidence, did you notice the lot of us arguing with you didn't argue that point? That is how evidence works. We can infer that your evidence for the other claim hasn't cleared that bar.
Click to expand...

Of course they admitted to it, they announced they were spending a million bucks on reddit, for example:
These activities are aimed to "including the more than tripling of its digital operation to engage in online messaging both for Secretary Clinton and to push back against attackers on social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, and Instagram. Barrier Breakers 2016 is a project of Correct The Record and the brainchild of David Brock, and the task force will be overseen by President of Correct The Record Brad Woodhouse and Digital Director Benjamin Fischbein."
Click to expand...

explain exactly how they are showing attribution on reddit, how for example are they showing they are upvoting or downvoting?
 
16.5 said:
Of course they admitted to it, they announced they were spending a million bucks on reddit, for example:

explain exactly how they are showing attribution on reddit, how for example are they showing they are upvoting or downvoting?
Click to expand...

It seems rather ludicrous to complain about lack of attribution for an action that doesn't support showing attribution.
 
TheL8Elvis said:
It seems rather ludicrous to complain about lack of attribution for an action that doesn't support showing attribution.
Click to expand...

Oh my stars! He has figured it out! They have admitted that they are pushing back on reddit, which has features that do not permit attribution! ergo? Pure astroturfing!

Fantastic!

This should have been bloody obvious to anyone who has ever looked at reddit.

Hillary 2016, Anonymously "Pushing Back" on Reddit using dark money Super Pacs since 2015.

and people are actually going to vote for this cretin?
 
Bill Clinton 20 years ago sounds a lot like Donald Trump today

Quotes from Bill Clinton talking illegal immigration and the problem of border control and being a nation of laws from his 1996 State of the Union which shows a striking comparison to what presumptive Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump has been saying about the subject.

From Clinton's 1996 State of the Union address:

"After years of neglect, this administration has taken a strong stand to stiffen the protection of our borders. We are increasing border controls by 50 percent. We are increasing inspections to prevent the hiring of illegal immigrants. And tonight, I announce I will sign an executive order to deny federal contracts to businesses that hire illegal immigrants.

"We are still a nation of immigrants; we should be proud of it, but we are also a nation of laws."

Watch the 1 minute side-by-side comparison (Bill Clinton vs Donald Trump) video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCC6l4-5MHA
Click to expand...


Crooked Hillary has told us that, if elected, her husband Bill will be in charge of running the US economy; while she deals with the far more pressing and important issues of "paid leave" and "affordable child care".

But which one of the two Clinton's will tackle our immigration problems? Will it be 1996 Bill Clinton, or 2016 Crooked Hillary?

"We need comprehensive immigration reform with a path to full and equal citizenship. If Congress won't act, I'll defend executive actions—and I'll go even further to keep families together. I'll end family detention, close private immigrant detention centers, and help more eligible people become naturalized." -- Crooked Hillary Jan 6, 2016

"I'll defend executive actions," she said. And it's a safe bet she will.
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
It clearly was ghost written, that point is not debatable.

It was edited by correct the record.

None of this was attributed.
Click to expand...

Editing is not ghost writing. That is why editors get n editor credit and not a writing credit on a book.
 
16.5 said:
Oh my stars! He has figured it out! They have admitted that they are pushing back on reddit, which has features that do not permit attribution! ergo? Pure astroturfing!

Fantastic!
Click to expand...

Oh , you now have evidence this is happening ? Please present it.
 
Argumemnon said:
Isn't it normal for a president to have people around them to deal with stuff?
Click to expand...


Well, it would certainly be the first time in US history that a sitting president put their own spouse in charge of running the country's economy. Hey, maybe Chelsea Clinton can be Secretary of Defense.
 
TheL8Elvis said:
No, she hasn't.
Click to expand...


During a campaign event in Fort Mitchell, the Democratic presidential candidate was more blunt than ever about what her husband's role could be in a future Clinton administration — saying she plans to put the former president "in charge of economic revitalization."

"My husband, who I'm going to put in charge of revitalizing the economy, cause you know he knows how to do it," Clinton told the crowd at an outdoor organizing rally. "And especially in places like coal country and inner cities and other parts of our country that have really been left out."

"I've told my husband he's got to come out of retirement and be in charge of this because you know he’s got more ideas a minute than anybody I know," she said, while talking about manufacturing and jobs.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/bill-...ry?id=39132832
 
Argumemnon said:
Is her husband competent to do this job?
Click to expand...


There are nepotism laws that have been passed to prevent this sort of shenanigans. But the Clinton's, as usual, will always look for a new way to skirt the law:

The federal anti-nepotism law enacted in December 1967 -- partly as a reaction to John F. Kennedy's appointment of his brother Robert as attorney general -- prohibits any official in the three branches of government, including the president, from appointing a relative to a job over which that official has authority or control. This means Mr. Clinton could not be a cabinet secretary or an ambassador, or White House chief of staff. His role would be necessarily ambiguous. At a time when voters are crying out for more openness in government, such an arrangement raises questions about transparency and accountability.

http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB119734264023820435
Click to expand...
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Crooked Hillary has told us that, if elected, her husband Bill will be in charge of running the US economy; while she deals with the far more pressing and important issues of "paid leave" and "affordable child care".
Click to expand...

Really ? Because I know someone who has posted something that contradicts that statement....

Slings and Arrows said:
During a campaign event in Fort Mitchell, the Democratic presidential candidate was more blunt than ever about what her husband's role could be in a future Clinton administration — saying she plans to put the former president "in charge of economic revitalization."

"My husband, who I'm going to put in charge of revitalizing the economy, cause you know he knows how to do it," Clinton told the crowd at an outdoor organizing rally. "And especially in places like coal country and inner cities and other parts of our country that have really been left out."
Click to expand...

Revitalising parts of the economy is not the same as running the economy. The former is presumably involves setting up and running some initiatives to kickstart local and regional business initiatives. The latter is a completely different kettle of fish (and is probably in any case impossible for one person to do given the breadth of responsiblity).

It's like saying that "So and so fed the 5,000" when what he actually did was go to the bar to get a five drink round in and bought a bag of pork scratchings, two bags of crisps and some dry roasted peanuts :rolleyes:
 
HRC has been declared guilty without due process in the email thing. Now she's guilty of doing something she isn't even in position to do.

They have no issues to run on other then to try and slime the Clintons. It's like the forum "skeptics" are doing nothing more than reading the Republican parties talking points.
 
Argumemnon said:
Is he competent or not?
Click to expand...


That's a good question, but I don't know the answer.

Bill Clinton will turn 70 in a few months, and has been retired since leaving office in 2001. Has he still got the juice? Who knows?

And what are his policies? What does he plan to do, if and when Crooked Hillary turns the reins of power over to him?

Will he be participating in the upcoming presidential debates, outlining his vision for America's economy? And why isn't his name on the ballot, if he's the one who will be running the show?
 
Slings and Arrows said:
Will he be participating in the upcoming presidential debates, outlining his vision for America's economy? And why isn't his name on the ballot, if he's the one who will be running the show?
Click to expand...

Except, as is clearly stated in text you linked, he won't be running the show. At most he will be guiding some local and regional stimulus. Unless you haven't bothered to read what you post, you must know that but I guess it's more important to criticise Hillary than it is to consider the facts :rolleyes:
 
The Don said:
Except, as is clearly stated in text you linked, he won't be running the show. At most he will be guiding some local and regional stimulus. Unless you haven't bothered to read what you post, you must know that but I guess it's more important to criticise Hillary than it is to consider the facts :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


"At most"?

Will you please provide a source for that assertion; I must of missed it?
 
theprestige said:
No, please. Tell me more about why Hillary's astroturfing isn't something that should bother me.
Click to expand...

Almost 13 million people have voted for her. She has more popular votes than either Trump or Sanders.

And you're griping about campaign spending/tactics that you think are astroturfing?

:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom