Hillary Clinton Defends High-Dollar Speaking Fees

[sunmaster14]

Your repeated non-answer provides the answer I expected in the first place.

You're off-base here. Since her husband's election in 1992, Hillary Clinton has never ever been in financial distress. For ex-presidents and their wives, money barely has any personal meaning, since there is always a fawning wealthy person around to lend them (or give them) whatever they need. Hillary's claim to be broke was both laughable and pathetic at the same time. She has a tendency towards almost desperate exaggeration from time to time. I'm not sure why she does it.

 

[thaiboxerken]

She has a tendency towards almost desperate exaggeration from time to time. I'm not sure why she does it.

How does it make you feel knowing that she will be the next POTUS?

 

[sunmaster14]

How does it make you feel knowing that she will be the next POTUS?

As I've stated a couple of times before here, I think she would be a decent President. Obviously, I would far prefer to see a Republican win, not because I care about labels particularly, and certainly not because I have anything directly to gain from Republican success (I'm not politically active or connected), but because, to a greater extent than ever before, politicians feel irresistible pressure to adhere to their party's fundamental tenets.

Even a Hillary victory, however, will do little to temper my joy and relief at seeing Obama and his minions finally relinquish the reins of power.

 

[dudalb]

So it's OK for a Republican to get high fees for speaking, but bad for a Democrat to do it????????????????

 

[theprestige]

So [...] ????????????????

No................