• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Hello from a non-skeptic

Charles Boden said:
The post on "get a life" was deleted just as others have been.

(1)If you answer my questions concerning how the act of observation can cause the wave-particle effect and (2)how a plant, who knowingly has no brain, can hold a form of "consciousness" as demonstrated by the experiment with the lie detector, then we can continue. "Consciousness" is "Information" in its purest form, and it is at the origin of the creation of all things. Find the means to test this and I very much doubt that you will prove me wrong.

I have not "dodged" your questions. I have given you all the references you need to find the answers for them. I am not hear to "spoon feed" you all.

Concerning my "agent", I am taking the necessary measures, so thank you for your concern and assistance.

Les, I have not replied to you out of politeness. In fact I have, but my post was deleted (which I knew it would be). You are certainly not qualified to evaluate my work, and your insinuations are not worth my responding to, just ignored as I have been doing.

I would very much like to request the moderation team here that this thread might now be closed. You have all told me to leave so many times, but contrarily to what you say (as so often has been the case here) it has been you and not I who have prolonged the life of this thread.

I have not contradicted myself, Garrette. The 1st payments are going to be donated to charity, even if the "charity" might be my agent, and a percentage from then on. Contrarily to Chico Xavier, my work is not a psychography. It has been the result of my own hard work and effort over almost 20 years.

I wish you all a very Merry Xmas. Why you have all chosen to perform the "mission" that you seem to have encumbed yourselves of is a mystery to me. In all honesty, I would stop if I were you. Certainly there are dishonest people everywhere, and we must be able to differentiate them, but all that you have shown me here from the start has been extreme rudeness (now fortunately deleted), accusations and attacks.

Re-read this thread and the links and books I have recommended. In particular pay attention to the names and the onomastics, and you will find the answers to all of your questions. Elevate your thoughts, and do say a little prayer to Ohshallah/Yeshua/Jesus. It would do you all a world of good...
Click to expand...

1. It doesn't.

2. Plants don't think.

There you go.


Help me Ohshallah

Answer me Yeshua

Save me Jesus


Nope, no help there. Got any other advice?
 
Femke said:
<delurking>
Which is it, Charles? Have you not replied, or have you? it is so confusing how you can do things at the same time as not doing them.

This thread is one of the most entertaining and educational I've come across in a long time. Thank you and season's greetings to all.

<back to lurking>
Click to expand...

You'd think that someone who was a king of England would have learned not to stick his neck out.
 
Garrette said:
I doubt it.

If you were really their friend you would call them Boney and Iskander.

But I suppose if anyone is allowed to lie it is a supreme deity.
Click to expand...

I think it's in the job description.
 
dlorde said:
Whatever one's subjective opinion of its beauty, it certainly isn't perfect or flawless. It has no physical mechanism, yet claims physical influence, it has no convincing supporting evidence, it has no useful explanatory or predictive power, has no practical application, is unnecessary (Occam's Razor), is ill-defined and obscure (spiritual evolution?), and generally contradicts well-established physical and biological knowledge.

Apart from that, it's perfect & flawless - or did I miss something?

An inverse case of 'What have the Romans ever done for us?' :)
Click to expand...

Only things that don't exist can be perfect and flawless.
 
dlorde said:
I'm just about through on the PLF. There's no point keeping on plugging away with the science corrections - I think I've established that not all scientists and sceptics have evil intent, or only want to destroy their beliefs, and that a little science knowledge isn't necessarily a bad thing. But they really don't want to listen to anything that might disturb their comfortable and comforting worldview. I think my work there is done ;)
Click to expand...

I'm sorry to read this. Could you post links to your most recent posts?

I'm registered at PLF but never posted. Charles seems to not need advocacy so I may just have to just use my charm over there without introduction.
 
dlorde said:
OK. The most recent are probably the least interesting, but in descending date order:
Two Souls, One Body - DNA evidence
Two Souls, One Body - Chimerism
A question of dimensions
A question of dimensions - cherry picking
A question of dimensions - anecdotal reports
A question of dimensions - Feynman
...
and so-on. You can find them all via the PLF search feature.
Click to expand...

Thanks for posting. Your patient and understanding scepticism is an inspiration. I hope one or two of them do read "Surely You are Joking Mr Feynman".
 
Sideroxylon said:
Thanks for posting. Your patient and understanding scepticism is an inspiration. I hope one or two of them do read "Surely You are Joking Mr Feynman".
Click to expand...
Thanks - it's a lot harder than I thought to remain patient and understanding with that lot. Also, I'm not an expert in the fields I commented on, so I may have got some things wrong; but basically I was trying to come across as a representative of unthreatening science and scepticism. If they follow the links I gave them, they should learn something, but I'm not sure they're really that bothered.
 
dlorde said:
OK. The most recent are probably the least interesting, but in descending date order:
Two Souls, One Body - DNA evidence
Two Souls, One Body - Chimerism
A question of dimensions
A question of dimensions - cherry picking
A question of dimensions - anecdotal reports
A question of dimensions - Feynman
...
and so-on. You can find them all via the PLF search feature.
Click to expand...

dlorde, You continually amaze me. Your ability to not react negatively to attacks and to only offer educational posts is nothing if not an outstanding exercise in discipline. You even kind of won over that Nighttrain1 guy who is scary hostile (and he lives in my own small state of Connecticut:rolleyes:)

I suspect I can court Sunniva (unless FSM seems to care) and maintain your ethic of discipline (My preference is over the knee but discipline is discipline) over at the PastLives website if I decide to post there myself.
 
Senex said:
...
I suspect I can court Sunniva (unless FSM seems to care) and maintain your ethic of discipline (My preference is over the knee but discipline is discipline) over at the PastLives website if I decide to post there myself.
Click to expand...

If you do post there, be prepared to be ignored, misquoted and have your points misunderstood. It's a real exercise in restraint, quite a learning experience ;)

Good luck!
 
Senex said:
dlorde, You continually amaze me. Your ability to not react negatively to attacks and to only offer educational posts is nothing if not an outstanding exercise in discipline. You even kind of won over that Nighttrain1 guy who is scary hostile (and he lives in my own small state of Connecticut :rolleyes:)
Click to expand...
A lesson from the Tao Te Ching:

The gentle and yielding is the disciple of life.
Thus an army without flexibility never wins a battle.
A tree that is unbending is easily broken.
The hard and strong will fall.
The soft and weak will overcome.
:D
 
Akhenaten said:
Biggar is better.
Click to expand...

Post of the thread right here :D


Charles Boden said:
Les, I have not replied to you out of politeness. In fact I have, but my post was deleted (which I knew it would be).
Click to expand...

Charles, why has your "politeness" not prevented you from replying to others on this thread?

You are certainly not qualified to evaluate my work, and your insinuations are not worth my responding to, just ignored as I have been doing.
Click to expand...

As it happens, I am. But there should be no qualification necessary to critically assess your claims. Wherever I have offered qualified opinion should be obvious, but the majority of my review is based purely on critical thought and online research.

It should be a simple matter for you to reply, in some form to my criticisms. View them as questions if you prefer. Let's start with Biggar.

Can you explain why contemporary maps of Biggar do not resemble your memories/visions?

And why there is no historical record of Charlie having stayed in the town at the time you claim?
 
Big Les said:
Post of the thread right here :D




Charles, why has your "politeness" not prevented you from replying to others on this thread?



As it happens, I am. But there should be no qualification necessary to critically assess your claims. Wherever I have offered qualified opinion should be obvious, but the majority of my review is based purely on critical thought and online research.

It should be a simple matter for you to reply, in some form to my criticisms. View them as questions if you prefer. Let's start with Biggar.

Can you explain why contemporary maps of Biggar do not resemble your memories/visions?

And why there is no historical record of Charlie having stayed in the town at the time you claim?
Click to expand...

I would be interested in the answers.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom