"Apostrophe" should be in quotation marks, like this "'". That would make it clearer and more closer to exactitudes'.I'm going to report this entire thread for attacking the apostrophe instead of the argument!
Somehow i'm sure that if someone would go to that strange "spiritualist center" over there, that person would surely find out that Charles was talking about his supposed royal ancestry all the time, and thus made it easy for the medium to get and use that piece of information.
I'll bet a six-pack of tasty german beer on all that.
Chris, I have visions of Charles turning up at seances wearing a Stewarts of Appin tartan kilt and a t-shirt emblazoned with the words "BONNIE PRINCE CHARLIE RULES!"
"Apostrophe" should be in quotation marks, like this "'". That would make it clearer and more closer to exactitudes'.
What kind of case do you use for storing your possessives? Mine is oak, and my granddaddy gave it to me when I won my first punctuation bee.I don't know what Charles thinks -- but I would be proud to have this group of people look so forward to reading what I wrote. May the future book of Senex (notice how I dodged the possessive case) be as anticipated.
Now you're attcking all punctuation. Mods! MODS!
Shame on me, but:
How do we know the previous version of the article is correct? There aren't any citation that we could go back on (in which case let's find 'em!)![]()
I don't know what Charles thinks -- but I would be proud to have this group of people look so forward to reading what I wrote. May the future book of Senex (notice how I dodged the possessive case) be as anticipated.
Get on with your writing; I'm looking forward to reading [font=+2]Seneck's Book.[/font]