justsaygnosis
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Dec 10, 2002
- Messages
- 263
...any more than capital punishment is.
Hell has been preached for centuries and yet it hasn't scared anyone into being 'good'.
Capital punishment is the most extreme measure with which we can respond to atrocious behavior as a society. It doesn't stop the behavior it simply achieves the result that the recipient will not be a repeat offender.
Rhode Island outlawed capital punishment after an innocent man was hanged.....OOPS!!!....sorry. Can it be used in extreme circumstances? I have mixed emotions. Sometimes something so despicable occurs it seems a waste of time to finance keeping a psychotic alive indefinitely. The flip side is execution is actually more merciful than allowing them to linger until they die.
The only thing I can surmise, to the limits of my understanding, that truly DETERS abhorrent behavior is a consciousness that functions with sufficient empathy, self-worth and dignity that they are prevented from behaving maniacally by their psychic constitution.
The golden rule can also be stated,"Don't do to another so as to cause them suffering", rather than simply 'Do unto others as you would have done unto you." For example, a sado-masochist may enjoy being humiliated and beaten but that's not a permit to do the same unto others.
It's been argued repetitively that all moral, ethical and empathetic reasoning did NOT arise exclusively of religions.
Once again for the fundies....HELL DOESN'T WORK as a deterrent.
See if you can come up with something better.
Hell has been preached for centuries and yet it hasn't scared anyone into being 'good'.
Capital punishment is the most extreme measure with which we can respond to atrocious behavior as a society. It doesn't stop the behavior it simply achieves the result that the recipient will not be a repeat offender.
Rhode Island outlawed capital punishment after an innocent man was hanged.....OOPS!!!....sorry. Can it be used in extreme circumstances? I have mixed emotions. Sometimes something so despicable occurs it seems a waste of time to finance keeping a psychotic alive indefinitely. The flip side is execution is actually more merciful than allowing them to linger until they die.
The only thing I can surmise, to the limits of my understanding, that truly DETERS abhorrent behavior is a consciousness that functions with sufficient empathy, self-worth and dignity that they are prevented from behaving maniacally by their psychic constitution.
The golden rule can also be stated,"Don't do to another so as to cause them suffering", rather than simply 'Do unto others as you would have done unto you." For example, a sado-masochist may enjoy being humiliated and beaten but that's not a permit to do the same unto others.
It's been argued repetitively that all moral, ethical and empathetic reasoning did NOT arise exclusively of religions.
Once again for the fundies....HELL DOESN'T WORK as a deterrent.
See if you can come up with something better.