• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Heiwa article accepted at AsCE

twinstead said:
Yup. Regular truthers suspect that people like you, bill, are government plants to make truthers look like idiots. That's not very nice of them, is it?
Click to expand...

I never thought of that,it makes sense,nobody could be as obtuse as Bill.
 
bill smith said:
You should take that notion a few steps further daffyd....
Click to expand...

What? You really will spout any old nonsense,won't you? I have no idea what you mean by that innuendo,nothing as usual I suspect.Still,you got a reaction from me which is what you were trolling for.Mission accomplished Bill,now you can sit back with a self-satisfied smile.
 
Sword_Of_Truth said:
You lied again. Very few twoofers are in the "no planes" camp. And those that aren't HATE those that are. They think you are working for "them" and trying to make all twoofers look stupid.


Except for that whole laws of physics thing and the tens of thousands of eyewitnesses.



Except that Bjorkman has no qualifications to perform the work he has done on his "theory". He is like a small child trying to perform brain surgery. You lied when you said he was a "structural damage analyst".
Click to expand...
Whether no-planes makes sense or not has little to do with the volume of evidence that points that way. I myself am reluctant to believe in no-planes but I cannot deny that some of the evidence is very persuasive . I could make the readers hair stand up with some of the evidence I can show. But that is for another time.
 
bill smith said:
Whether no-planes makes sense or not has little to do with the volume of evidence that points that way. I myself am reluctant to believe in no-planes but I cannot deny that some of the evidence is very persuasive . I could make the readers hair stand up with some of the evidence I can show. But that is for another time.
Click to expand...

What a load of bollocks.
 
Last edited:
twinstead said:
Yup. Regular truthers suspect that people like you, bill, are government plants to make truthers look like idiots. That's not very nice of them, is it?
Click to expand...

Regular truthers woke up then fell back to sleep. No planers have stayed alert.
 
bill smith said:
Did you notice that Heiwa published his new discussion paper in full on his website yesterday ? I think he lost patience with the delaying tactics of the Journal of Engineering Mechanics despite their written avowal that they would publish.

http://heiwaco.tripod.com/blgb.htm
Click to expand...

They must have read the paper then.There is no need to follow the link,we are all familiar with Heiwa's harebrained ideas.
 
In Heiwa's references

[2] The Missing Jolt: A Simple Refutation of the NIST-Bazant Collapse Hypothesis

Graeme MacQueen, Tony Szamboti, January 14, 2009

***Shakes head*****
 
bill smith said:
Did you notice that Heiwa published his new discussion paper in full on his own website yesterday ? I think he lost patience with the delaying tactics of the Journal of Engineering Mechanics despite their written avowal that they would publish.

http://heiwaco.tripod.com/blgb.htm Heiwa new paper
http://heiwaco.tripod.com/nist.htm Heiwa website
Click to expand...

It looks like the delay may have been caused by the original fraudsters:

The below Discussion to Paper was submitted to ASCE - Journal of Engineering Mechanics on 3 February 2009 and approved for publication 3 June 2009, apparently awaiting a reply by Messrs. Bazant, Le, Greening and Benson, that has not come forward 15 December 2009.The illustrations, figures 1-5, did not form part of the original submission to ASCE-JEM but are added here for easy verification of observations. As ASCE/JEM are delaying publication, I have decided to publish it here today, 15 December, 2009.
Click to expand...
 
oh noes they are taking time to reply to a kook about kookery.

How bad of them

TAM;)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom