• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

"HD Digital TV is Mind Control"

You might have to set up the audio separatly for each input. You have Surround sound selected for HDMI 1 (your cable box connection) but do you have SS selected for HDMI 2?







It would be a fairly simple thing to have a bit of firmware that would recognize whether the signal coming in the HDMI port is HDMI or DVI but the engineer who designed the system knows the difference and barely even thinks about the common user's knowledge.

Programmers get the same way, they may design a program to do a task that they are not expert at.
for instance a video editing system
The programmer sets up the user interface and later on the users are cursing him "why did they put this function in this menu, its just so ackward?"

Our Final Cut system just craped out. The audio would lag the video (yes, not the other way around) by several seconds. Turns out that Final Cut does not 'like' a Sony DSR-1800 DVCAM tape deck and the communication between the computer and the VTR was corrupting the user preferences. Apple help line told us to create a new user, that fixed it but how stupid is that? So now we have a cheapo- DSR-11 VTR connected to Final Cut and we have the much more expensive DSR-1800 connected to our Pinnacle edit suite (which is high end consumer video editing whereas Final Cut is professional grade) Pinnacle is quite happy with the DSR-1800.

So are there any 'fixes' coming from Apple for this problem? Nope! Their solution is not to use a DSR 1800 since few production companies use DVCAM anyway. But how stupid is it that a VTR can corrupt settings in the editing software in the first place!!!

end rant........ Apple, bah!

I think that's probably it. The HDMI inputs on each TV set are configured differently.

Interesting comments on the edit systems' issues. While I don't work in the division, my company does a lot of high-end post work and I didn't know that Final Cut had those kind of issues. I wonder if Avid does?
 
I think that's probably it. The HDMI inputs on each TV set are configured differently.

Interesting comments on the edit systems' issues. While I don't work in the division, my company does a lot of high-end post work and I didn't know that Final Cut had those kind of issues. I wonder if Avid does?

I'm not an editor either. I can barely get started actually doing any work on Final Cut and have never seen an Avid suite. Speaking with others who have worked with Avid though it has its own set of issues. Apparently one can have trouble using Avid on a Vista machine.

We also have a Leitch Velocity system and its a peach(sarcasm).

However, my expertise lies in knowing the VTR's and other master control equipment. When there is a problem with the editing equipment though they call me to see if I have any ideas. Usually someone has changed communication settings but this time I told them they'd have to get on the horn with the Apple people. I'm just glad we did not have to completly re-install Final Cut
 
I sell high-end network origination, transmission, and distribution services.
 
I sell low-end Master Control switching, digital media ingest, local area ENG frequency deconfliction, satellite and fiber uplink/downlink, and Broadcast Alert System monitoring services. All while staying awake from 9pm to 5am.

Kinda makes me wish I did this back in the day when I could roll the signoff footage with the fighter plane, translator FCC IDs, legal address and the "Star-Spangled Banner" playing in the background, shut down the transmitter and go home for the night.

Alas, that was before the days of overnight paid programming and CBS News: Up To the Minute. With the economy being what it is, we are in a hard way trying to sell every single available second of programming just to stay in front of the wave.
 
Last edited:
I know of a bar that got all new HD plasma TVs a few years ago.

They never bothered to upgrade their cable/satellite package to get HD receivers, nor did they even bother to spend $9.99 for a rabit ear antenna, so they just have horrible looking standard def on their new TVs.

I refuse to go there to watch any sort of sporting event, such stupidity is physically painful to be around.

Problem is, people never read their manuals.
 
so whats the status on this conspiracy now that the changover has been postponed until june?
 
They need more time to synchronise the wavebeams.
the only spin i can come up with is they want to distribute more converter boxes so people who dont have ATSC TVs can be mind controlled (which of course was pointed out in this thread, if the mind control beams can be converted back to an analog format the digital switch is unnecessary)
 
I wonder why the CT flock never said anything when NTSC was made manditory?

Maybe the NTSC mind control signal was more effective than HDTV.

Most of the world uses PAL D, not NTSC.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:PAL-NTSC-SECAM.svg

NTSC suffers from colour correction faults PAL D has a phase alternating by line colour correction system, and subliminal mind control (teletext) system which utilises redundant field blanking signals.
 
What are the merits of DVB-T vs ATSC when it comes to mind control?
 
NTSC is easier to embed the "NWO Mindhack v1.2" subroutine into.

All we need to do now is power up the old "Steel Yard" array outside Chernobyl and domination is once again ours! MWAHAHAH...*COUGH* *HACK* *SPIT*

In all seriousness, I hear a lot of Russian HAMs in the area have actually used the old "Steel Yard" early warning radar array to run up aerials for their HF Xmitters.
 
Problem is, people never read their manuals.

,, and this was explained once by someone I saw in a lecture many years ago.

The education system teaches us to read literature. What do you do when you pick up a book? You turn to page one and begin reading and read every page in turn until you reach the end of the book (whether a fiction or non-fiction)

This does nothing to teach a person what to do with a technical publication such as a manual. If you turn to page one and start reading you will soon become very bored after reading "Thank you for purchasing your new HD television receiver.............." You may not get any useful information until several pages in and if there is a specific piece of info you want you may have to slog through dozens of pages first.
What is not taught is how to use a table of contents or an index and worse, many manuals contain neither, or such sketchy ones as to make them a study in how to frustrate a customer. Call for help? Yeah you can do that and hope that the accent of the person on the other end is not so thick as to compound the frustration. Call centers also often employ a system in which the operator is simply typing your problem into a data search engine and telling you what it tells him. He(she) need not actually understand the device.

Some of this applies to professional products as well but a technical person will understand how to use a manual. In professional products one runs into other problems;
1) the manual was written by an engieer who understands the device implicitly and writes the manual such that one must also already understand the device to understand the manual
or
2) the manual was tossed off and printed with typos and/or references to beta versions of the device. I have a Larcan transmitter with a manual that contains schematics that barely resemble the pcb they supposedly refer to. I called Larcan once and asked where the PIN diodes on a card are located.
"Oh those aren't used in the production model, just ignore them." was the response. I replied by asking that when they finsih writing up the final revision of the manual that they send me one. (holding the sarcastic tone in abeyance to see what the response would be) I was told that they would not be doing another version, which was as I expected.


(rant mode off)
 
What are the merits of DVB-T vs ATSC when it comes to mind control?

There is no difference in quality of the mind control signal. ATSC simply allows for a North America specific modification to not be picked up by non-USA or Canada 'clients'.

There are also consumer specific versions for cable (256 QAM) versus OTH (8VSB) 'clients' in which the different modulation schemes accomplish the required targeting and minimize unwanted crossover.

hey, this is fun!

,,, these aren't the 'droids you're looking for........
 
Of course, you know EAS is the greatest mind control signal of all.

Two second "Attention Signal?" Bollocks. It's an subliminal activation code.

"If this had been an actual emergency, this message would have been immediately followed by orders to gather your families for internment in to the nearest NWO-FEMA Compliance Camp....Uh, we mean Happy Fun Time Resort. This concludes this test of the Emergency Alert System."
 
Of course, you know EAS is the greatest mind control signal of all.

Two second "Attention Signal?" Bollocks. It's an subliminal activation code.

"If this had been an actual emergency, this message would have been immediately followed by orders to gather your families for internment in to the nearest NWO-FEMA Compliance Camp....Uh, we mean Happy Fun Time Resort. This concludes this test of the Emergency Alert System."

Which is itself mainly an American system.
In Canada this is accomplished during live coverage of curling and hockey.
 
These mind control CT's are always, and I mean always wrong. Everyone and their mother knows that we've already been under complete, effective mind control for well over 60 years.
 
You know, I suddenly don't want to keep my fancy HDTV set. If I lived in Tuscon, I would have been able to watch porn if I'd had Comcast and been watching the SD feed.
 
Wait... wait. This isn't satire?

Edit: from their homepage:
Educate-Yourself.org is a free educational forum dedicated to the dissemination of accurate information in the use of natural, non-pharmaceutical medicines and alternative healing therapies in the treatment of disease conditions. Free Energy, Earth Changes, and the growing reality of Big Brother are also explored
Oh dear....
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom