• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

"...have there ever been proven conspiracies?..."

JFK

"The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee was unable to identify the other gunmen or the extent of the conspiracy"

AARB

The board concludes that the medical/legal autopsy evidence is compromised to the point that no further investigation can be warranted.
Robert Kennedy disposed of this material in an unlawful manner.
 
Links?

Screw that.

Your in a discussion about conspiracies-and perhaps the most famous of all conspiracies-you know absolutely nothing about-but you are gun-ho about adding your opinion to something that you know nothing about.

How about this:

HSCA Final report and volume 7 conclusions

AARB Final report and volume 5

Lazy lazy lazy
 
...something that you know nothing about.

The JFK thread in this forum has been split twice already (for size) and contains considerable discussion of the HCSA and AARB findings, their basis and implications. Perhaps before concluding that no one here knows anything about it, you should head over there and check it out.
 
Links?

Screw that.

Your in a discussion about conspiracies-and perhaps the most famous of all conspiracies-you know absolutely nothing about-but you are gun-ho about adding your opinion to something that you know nothing about.

How about this:

HSCA Final report and volume 7 conclusions

AARB Final report and volume 5

Lazy lazy lazy


Can we start a betting pool for how many posts this user manages to rack up before earning the Golden Boot?

Put me down for 125.
 
Of course, though oftentimes they are as messy, disorganized and incompetent as you would expect any big group of people to be. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was a conspiracy which almost failed but Gavrilo Princip happened upon the Archduke right in front of him in a stalled car after the earlier assassination attempt failed.

Similarly the men who killed Caesar were part of a large conspiracy that was so large and poorly kept Caesar was given warning but didn't read the note and they failed both to kill Marc Antony (due to some of the conspirators opposing it) who was Caesar's right hand man and held all legitimate authority after Caesar's death, as the sole living consul, and got spooked and didn't follow through on the part of the plan where Caesar's body was to be thrown into the Tiber River. The backlash against the assassins, appropriately enough really got started at the eulogy for Caesar given by Antony.
 
Last edited:
"Lazy lazy lazy."

I'm reminded of a line from a 19th century book, the cite I have unfortunately lost but the sentence was:

He was a fine man who unerringly each day went to a butcher shop and obtained a pound and a half of tripe which he used as a substitute brain
 
Conspiracies get proven all the time.

Not by conspiracists, but by people who actually know what they are doing: police and corporate investigators, journalists, historians, auditors, etc.
And the occasional whistle blower.
 
My apologies go to anyone offended by language in the video Louis CK learns about the Catholic Church, which I linked to regarding the Roman Catholic church international cover up of child abuse, above. Shameful.
 
Can we start a betting pool for how many posts this user manages to rack up before earning the Golden Boot?

Put me down for 125.
Which will then be used as proof of the conspiracy theory that the ISF ban hammer is used to silence the opinions of "free thinkers". Of course, such bannings have nothing to do with the banned person's behavior.

But mark me an optimist, I'm going with 200 posts.
 
My apologies go to anyone offended by language in the video Louis CK learns about the Catholic Church, which I linked to regarding the Roman Catholic church international cover up of child abuse, above. Shameful.

No need to apologize to me. I could not imagine how a comedy sketch could meaningfully contribute to subject, so I skipped the video.

Is there a relevant point from the comedy bit that you wished to make?
 
No need to apologize to me. I could not imagine how a comedy sketch could meaningfully contribute to subject, so I skipped the video.

Is there a relevant point from the comedy bit that you wished to make?

I find satire can be more effective than other info delivery. Comedic exaggeration will sometimes get the point across to someone that wasn't getting it otherwise. IMO that video nailed it.
 
I find satire can be more effective than other info delivery. Comedic exaggeration will sometimes get the point across to someone that wasn't getting it otherwise. IMO that video nailed it.

Wow.
I just watched the video and I have absolutely no idea what point you were trying to illustrate with that video.

Can you explain how that video advances this discussion in any meaningful manner?
 
Last edited:
As always I stand by my statement. If someone is posting in a forum that is exclusively about conspiracies how can that someone not know about the government findings about the JFK assassination? Perhaps the best known conspiracy in all of history-that was decided 40 years ago.

Also, your memory is shot. You haven't called me a 'government shill' or 'CIA stooge' in the 3 days or so I have started posting here again.

Or my personal favorite an FBI 'asswipe'

You guys have just blown all your wheels.
 

Back
Top Bottom