Has Ron Paul reached you yet?

Has Ron Paul reached you yet?


  • Total voters
    105
i love it when men want to take away womens freedom. especially when they call themselves "patriots" and "freedom lovers".
Better yet, freedom loving
"libertarians"... yeah, right, sure.
 
Last edited:
I don't see anything funny about having a humble foreign policy. I don't know if you realize this TCS but we have american men and women DYING IN IRAQ FOR CORPORATE INTERESTS!

We do? Which corporation? Are they making money? Should I buy the stock?

And YOU'RE laughing about it!

Technically, I'm laughing at retards like Ron Paul, and his idiot followers.

We got dead kids in iraq...

How old are these "kids"? 6? 8? 12?

...and TCS is ****ing laughing.

I don't know what "****ing" means. "Closing"? "Fussing"?

The only candidate that will truly bring all the troops home and thusly making ourselves safer from a potential threat by using that money on intelligence and a strong national defense.

Ummm, genius, how do you suppose he will do this, given that he won't be elected?

What's funny about having sound money?

Nothing. We have it now. Or at least I do. I suspect you don't have much. Most 14 year olds don't.

What's funny about ending the "war on drugs" scam? What's funny about having a balanced budget?

Not sure. I thought we were talking about the war.

Tell me TCS, WHAT IS SO ****KING FUNNY????

Lot's of things. Ron Paul for one. Michael Badnarik for another. Heck, let's include all Libertarians! They're all fun to laugh at! :)

The only candidate serious about ending the war and tcs is fricckin' laughin'.

Which candidate? Is "fricckin'" a word?

Welcome to ignore TCS.

Is this "real" ignore, or "pretend" ignore, like Shanek used?

And here's the great part - if you slip up and respond to this, or anything else I say, you are exposed as a liar. Isn't that great?

pwn3d
 
Women have the choice to be celibate if they are not married. Women have the choice to wear shoes during their pregnancy. Women have the choice to get married. Women have the choice of what meal to fix and when to serve it so long as it is served by the time her man gets home.

Women have plenty of choices.

Have you ever met a woman who liked getting an abortion? Abortion is on it's way out. It's not even an issue. Yeah jane, if you want an abortion that's cool with me, but you can only do it when the baby is just a tadpole!

You stupid women have all these choices but you take them for granted. You don't even use them! freeze your eggs and get your tubes tied, use condoms, use birth control, get an IUD, take a morning after pill, (guaranteed effective for up to 72 hours) use a diaphragm.

Also let's not rule out adoption.

This is america twits, You have MANY choices.

Be celibate. Keep it in your pants.


Lets look at the males. Males, rhythm method, pull out,
Edited by Lisa Simpson: 
Edited to remove inappropriate remark.
, get a vasectomy.

You see how minute abortion is compared to others. I think when you leave it up to the markets you will see the abortion phase out into the sunset. maybe a few years from now abortion will be extinct.

Do not use obscene terminology.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ron Paul is a silly fool. I dont know why he ever "ran" for President. He must be delusional to think even 10% of the USA would support him. He should just stay with his little club of right-wing freaks in Texas where he belongs.
 
Ron Paul is a silly fool. I dont know why he ever "ran" for President. He must be delusional to think even 10% of the USA would support him. He should just stay with his little club of right-wing freaks in Texas where he belongs.

Yeah ending the war, having sound money, having a balanced budget are freaky things?

Do not insult other posters.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Cuddles
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So, Ron Paul is pro-freedom, unless you're gay or a woman?
I wonder why this is?

He is more pro-freedom than any other candidate. I mean come on, how many candidates will pardon all non violent drug offenders? I mean if Ron Paul is elected pres. My brother gets outta jail!
 
He is more pro-freedom than any other candidate. I mean come on, how many candidates will pardon all non violent drug offenders? I mean if Ron Paul is elected pres. My brother gets outta jail!
Population of the United States in 2006: 265 million

Population of non-violent drug offenders arrested in 2006, according to this website: 1.6 million (rounded up). This is about .6% of all people in the U.S.

I can safely assume that the number of woman is about half the population in total in the United States, give or take. That is about 132.5 million people in 2006. This is about 50% of all people in the U.S., and is greater than 1.6 million by a magnitude of 83 times.

Today, there would be more women, even if there were more people in jail for non-violent drug abuse.

If Ron Paul is restricting the rights of women while also freeing non-violent drug offenders, the net effect is not all that good. He's catering to about .6% of America, and then furthermore restricts the rights of around 50% of America.

Unless, of course, he's not quite as misogynistic as you are, which would be a great relief.

Furthermore, if he is willing to end abortions altogether, I see no reason to assume that he won't get extremist when it comes to the Morning After Pill -- which is, after all, considered by some pro-life proponents to be a process of abortion as it can possibly prevent post-fertilization of a blastocyst; these proponents usually believe that, say, pregnancy begins at fertilization -- one of the farthest ends of anti-abortion nuts.
 
Last edited:
Population of the United States in 2006: 265 million

Population of non-violent drug offenders arrested in 2006, according to this website: 1.6 million (rounded up). This is about .6% of all people in the U.S.

I can safely assume that the number of woman is about half the population in total in the United States, give or take. That is about 132.5 million people in 2006. This is about 50% of all people in the U.S., and is greater than 1.6 million by a magnitude of 83 times.

Today, there would be more women, even if there were more people in jail for non-violent drug abuse.

If Ron Paul is restricting the rights of women while also freeing non-violent drug offenders, the net effect is not all that good. He's catering to about .6% of America, and then furthermore restricts the rights of around 50% of America.

Unless, of course, he's not quite as misogynistic as you are, which would be a great relief.

Furthermore, if he is willing to end abortions altogether, I see no reason to assume that he won't get extremist when it comes to the Morning After Pill -- which is, after all, considered by some pro-life proponents to be a process of abortion as it can possibly prevent post-fertilization of a blastocyst; these proponents usually believe that, say, pregnancy begins at fertilization -- one of the farthest ends of anti-abortion nuts.

What the HELL is your point? I am not misogynist! I say abortion is fine, but as a last resort, it is very primitive. Morning after pills, birth control, IUD's, condoms, diaphragms, getting your tubes tied, are all better alternatives than abortion. And adoption.
 

Back
Top Bottom