Harrits february 28th online chat

[Josarhus]

Well there must be a peer reviewed paper out there somewhere, how else could he come to that conclusion

Well under the peer reviewed section of Journal of 911 studies, you will actually find one article confirming that a large airplane impacted the Pentagon since none of the other theories add up. And you will find an article that says that the official flight path from the FDR is coherent with flight 77 hitting the building:

http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles.html

The peer reviewed flight path studie that confirms flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, was done by Harrits fellow author Frank Legge.

Harrit is on the 911 Consensus Panel and we know what they can agree on, but it must be quite interesting to find out what they don't agree on.

 

[Spanx]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XF334x-xWz8&feature=youtube

At around the 25 min mark, Harrit talks about the pentagon. He will not except eye witness accounts unless they are in a court of law which is strange considering he has collected all of 'evidence' online.

I guess YouTube is the new court of law.

 

[AsbjornAndersen]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XF334x-xWz8&feature=youtube

At around the 25 min mark, Harrit talks about the pentagon. He will not except eye witness accounts unless they are in a court of law which is strange considering he has collected all of 'evidence' online.

I guess YouTube is the new court of law.

He is directly accusing NIST of scientific fraud That's 100 times more serious than what he tried to sue a journalist for.

 

[Spanx]

He is directly accusing NIST of scientific fraud That's 100 times more serious than what he tried to sue a journalist for.

And what's that got to do with the Pentagon ?

 

[DGM]

He is directly accusing NIST of scientific fraud That's 100 times more serious than what he tried to sue a journalist for.

It's only serious if it was actually taken seriously. He is not.

 

[Spanx]

I don't think that there is a single Danish truther who does not claim pools of molten steel at Ground Zero.

Apparently they all forgot to consult their own guru on this.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XF334x-xWz8&feature=youtube

If you skip to the 2 hour mark. Harrit is claiming molten iron

 

[Josarhus]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XF334x-xWz8&feature=youtube

If you skip to the 2 hour mark. Harrit is claiming molten iron

That's how it goes when you come up with so many lies, it gets difficult to keep track of where you actually stand on the different issues.

By the way, you could've given a more precise mark, god damn it I had to listen to a lot of BS from him before I found it

 

[AsbjornAndersen]

And what's that got to do with the Pentagon ?

Nothing to do with the Pentagon. Just the interview in general.

 

[AsbjornAndersen]

It's only serious if it was actually taken seriously. He is not.

Good point

 

[Spanx]

That's how it goes when you come up with so many lies, it gets difficult to keep track of where you actually stand on the different issues.

By the way, you could've given a more precise mark, god damn it I had to listen to a lot of BS from him before I found it

I have now watched the whole interview and have come to the conclusion that Harrit is a crank.

The most amazing thing is that due to Harrit recording this video, truthers claim it to be some form of victory over the BBC. It has made Harrit look pathetic.

I look forward to Harrit loosing his latest court case and hope that his own video is used against him as evidence that he is a crank.

 

[Josarhus]

I have now watched the whole interview and have come to the conclusion that Harrit is a crank.

The most amazing thing is that due to Harrit recording this video, truthers claim it to be some form of victory over the BBC. It has made Harrit look pathetic.

I look forward to Harrit loosing his latest court case and hope that his own video is used against him as evidence that he is a crank.

It will be quite interesting to see what the outcome of the appeal proceedings will be.

Harrit mentioned during the chat session, that no date has been set yet, and that he twice has asked the court to set a date, without any luck.