It still comes down to the crazy old fart's wanting to ban abortion and homosexuality and to establish state religions. Since the Supreme Court could, as the law now stands, rule that a state has violated the US constitution by banning certain sexual practices or requiring prayer in schools, what crazy old Ron wants to do is tell them to butt out so that the states can begin limiting citizens' rights.
This is not defending democracy, but opening the door to more limitations of individual rights at the state level.
Which is why it's so exasperating to hear people insist that they don't care for Ron Paul's conspiratorial thinking, they aren't PaulBots, but they support him anyways because he's a "true libertarian" who believes in liberty. If it's all about protecting liberty, why the obsession with leaving the states free to deny people's rights? (And I'm even putting aside the abortion issue for now.)

