• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Guergis Imbroglio

What's the deal with Guergis??

  • Bribery

    Votes: 1 16.7%
  • Fraud

    Votes: 1 16.7%
  • Drugs

    Votes: 1 16.7%
  • On planet X, this is what good cabinet ministers do

    Votes: 3 50.0%

  • Total voters
    6

Captain.Sassy

Master Poster
Joined
Sep 14, 2009
Messages
2,236
What does JREF think?

My guess is bribery or influence peddling of some sort, though fraud is also a possibility.

Maybe it has something to do with her hubby love's penchant for sniffable delights?

"I hate cocaine, but I love how it smells." - Jaffer, 2004

Anyways, will be interesting to see if this **** bomb sprays any more Tories.
 
Last edited:
Possibly: Mr Harper does not read newspapers and someone in his employ finally plucked up the courage to tell him what has been reported in them about Guergis' antics in the last couple of weeks? :explode
 
You mean the mansion?

That's why I put fraud up there.

She already apologized for flipping out in the airport, and apologized for the sneak letters in the House of Commons, so Harpo probly knows bout that.

Man, I wish Frank was still around. They'd have the skinny. They always did.
 
I'm still trying to figure out how the cocaine possession charges against Jaffer were dropped. All I can figure is (a) what the police found was not actually cocaine, or (b) the cocaine was found as a result of something which would be deemed an illegal search.

Option (a) doesn't strike me as particular realistic, and option (b) would mean the police screwed up. I'd like to think there're a little more competent than that.
 
Re Jaffer: a lawyer friend of mine, with no connection to the case at all, suspects (b) is the correct answer. She said the Crown Attorney's actions and statements are what she'd expect after an illegal search.
 
Re Jaffer: a lawyer friend of mine, with no connection to the case at all, suspects (b) is the correct answer. She said the Crown Attorney's actions and statements are what she'd expect after an illegal search.

Some speculation from a CBC Radio show a couple of mornings ago (sorry, no reference, but it was speculation anyway ;)). One was that Jaffer's lawyer was complaining that the drugs were in Jaffer's jacket hanging in his car not his trousers' pocket as the police claim. Good luck before a judge with this one I would guess. And the other (more possible, I suppose) was that Jaffer was given a deal if he spilt the goods on his criminal friends. This spreads across jurisdictions (RCMP and OPP) but I guess is somewhat possible.

IANAL & etc,
 
Some speculation from a CBC Radio show a couple of mornings ago (sorry, no reference, but it was speculation anyway ;)). One was that Jaffer's lawyer was complaining that the drugs were in Jaffer's jacket hanging in his car not his trousers' pocket as the police claim.


A report on the CBC National News earlier tonight recounted the events of Jaffer's arrest. It does mention that the drugs were found in Jaffer's jacket pocket.
 
I have a prediction: This will get worse before it gets better. (or possibly vice versa).

"Oh, how the mighty have fallen."

;)
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom