• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ground level steel beam

And by the way - of course they were taking their masks off to smoke - they were told it was safe to do so by Christine Todd Whitman, and we were all told it was safe to smoke by the Tobacco industry for 50 years as well. The full death toll as a result of this is expected to exceed the number of people who died on the day.

Christine Todd Whitman told them it was safe to smoke? Can you point me to that statement?

And can you point me to any statement by any official in any department at any time that the respirator rule at Ground Zero was not in effect?
 
Christine Todd Whitman told them it was safe to smoke? Can you point me to that statement?

And can you point me to any statement by any official in any department at any time that the respirator rule at Ground Zero was not in effect?

Har har har, very good.

The respirator rule?

Is it your claim that each of the first responders was issued with a 'respirator'?

Paper masks most of them had.
 
Actually, the more he posts the more convinced I am that scooby is not pdoh - but is in fact Stundie! The sentence structure, the improper use of words, the inability to comprehend what he reads, has Stundie all over it.
I'm mostly familiar with Stundie's "Stundie"-nominated posts. I forget: Stundie is also a Brit, yes?

To me, scooby has come across like multiple p'doh socks: initially JAQ, then more and more bitter, angry, and full-on batcrap-crazy denier.

I see what you mean about the sentence structure and improper use of words, though.

scooby, we know that pdoherty76 claimed to have a maths degree, but his so-called university would not confirm that. Do you have a college or university degree? If so, in what area of study?
 
Last edited:
Har har har, very good.

The respirator rule?

Is it your claim that each of the first responders was issued with a 'respirator'?

Paper masks most of them had.
I am well-versed on this subject. Tell me, scooby, from what sources do you derive your information?
 
From measuring something...given how quickly that could be done, he would be the smartest Mathematician on the planet by now.

TAM:)
 
Last edited:
Whats this I wonder...

http://www.spazmataz.net/members/ph...set_albumName=wtc-gallery1&id=AIRPLANE_ENGINE

I am sure it has been linked to, but it is the first time I have seen this particular photo.

That's the portion of the (probably starboard) engine from flight 175 that wound up at Church & Murray Streets, north of the WTC. The "Murray" sign was knocked down and in most photos is visible on the ground next to the engine. The engine's smoking, flaming trail is quite clear in the wide shots of the south tower fireball. Some people who were near the Woolworth building saw that smoke trail leading to the south tower and thought a missile had been fired at the tower. NIST estimates that the engine exited the north wall of the south tower at 155 mph (250 km/h).

Edit:
And this is the clearest photo of the plane hitting the second tower.

http://www.spazmataz.net/members/photos/gallery/view_photo.php?set_albumName=wtc-gallery2&id=2087_G
In 2006, here's what Jason Bermas and Dylan Avery told a sizable audience in Oakland, California about flight 175 (from Loose Change Creators Speak):

Bermas: Well the evidence that the planes were not the ones they suggested they were is pretty evident. We don't have [inaudible], we don't seem to have anything identifiable at the Pentagon. And the video of the second plane hitting the tower, all we see is the gray underside of the plane, which should be blue. On top of this, the Pentagon and the second WTC planes pulled high G-force maneuvers that did not seem possible anyway.

...I think the evidence is quite strong that they probably switched drone aircraft during war games, and hit the buildings with separate aircraft.

...Just the evidence that it's a totally gray plane, and it's supposed to have markings on it, and not one video on one of the clearest days ever in New York, after all that evidence, can show me that it's a... (to Avery) what airline is it?

Avery (under his breath): United.

Bermas: A United Airlines plane, is pretty evident.

879045fcaf5d6f97f.jpg


What hideous, hideous creeps.
 
Last edited:
Hideous...agreed.

That blow up makes it even clearer. I mean unless they are going to claim the photo is a fake (which they likely will), I think this shot shows CONCLUSIVELY that a commercial Jet Airliner, likely United Airlines, hit the WTC.

TAM:)
 
scooby, we know that pdoherty76 claimed to have a maths degree, but his so-called university would not confirm that. Do you have a college or university degree? If so, in what area of study?

Are you by any chance making a poor attempt at eliciting personal information from me, and failing miserably?
 
Are you by any chance making a poor attempt at eliciting personal information from me, and failing miserably?
So are you incapable of answering simple questions, presenting simple facts, and making any headway in proving the 9/11 truth movement. All you have are lies. Why not tell us your educational background?

Transformers do blow up and make a big noise like an explosion. That is one of the most challenged sig quote ever, the sig of a challenged CTer.

Example!

LaPORTE -- American Renolit Corp. may need a week to restore full operations after a Tuesday night transformer explosion.
The series of blasts were caused by a short circuit on lines carrying more than 12,000 volts, said Tim Jones, maintenance supervisor at the plant.
Enough heat was produced by the short circuit to cause a melt down of the transformer and light up the sky for several blocks.
The explosions from the transformer went on for several minutes and triggered fires inside electrical boxes leading to the plant, a company official said. Nobody was injured, officials said.
How inexperienced are you? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzbQjd_Oo4Q

Darn one with thermite a CTers dream http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WHSBph71GX8

A double http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S7cHgAVVNck
 
Last edited:
I realize it was a typo and I just thought I would point it out so you can fix it, I wasn't rude in anyway (like you).


TAM made a typing error, but it was obvious what was meant. The obviously unintentional omission of the "d" did not alter the context, so no correction was needed. It is considered pretty rude and pedantic to correct such errors. Should I sieve all of your posts for such errors and correct them for you accordingly?
 
Hideous...agreed.

That blow up makes it even clearer. I mean unless they are going to claim the photo is a fake (which they likely will), I think this shot shows CONCLUSIVELY that a commercial Jet Airliner, likely United Airlines, hit the WTC.

TAM:)
Only complete idiots would claim that's not UA175.

Obviously the troofers will be unconvinced.
 
Gravy Quoting Avery and Bermas said:
...Just the evidence that it's a totally gray plane, and it's supposed to have markings on it, and not one video on one of the clearest days ever in New York, after all that evidence, can show me that it's a... (to Avery) what airline is it?

Avery (under his breath): United.

Bermas: A United Airlines plane, is pretty evident.


This little exchange says all you need to know about the Louder Than Words "filmmakers".

-Gumboot
 
Have they seen this actual photo? What do the "no-planers" say about it? CGI? Fakery?

TAM:)
 
Are you by any chance making a poor attempt at eliciting personal information from me, and failing miserably?
I don't think anyone hears give a crap who you are. What I'm curious about is the educational and work background of someone who's view of reality is so consistently wrong.
 

Back
Top Bottom