Ed Griffin and Truthers Supporting Convicted Terrorist

JihadJane said:
Perhaps you better pin yourself to your Truther dodger wall, 16.5.

(Who's attempting to "justify or minimize the crimes of actual terrorists"?)
Click to expand...

Quoting lying scumbag truthers makes me a truther, well ain't that something!

Kinda funny that you did not address the fact that DRG was lying, JJ.
 
JihadJane said:
Keep spooning out the reassurance because no one seems to be listening to you. Scott.in.taiwan, for example, is scared even to let his children onto the streets because of Truthers.
Click to expand...

In a two month period earlier this spring, 9/11 truthers murdered three police officers and an armed security guard.
 
D'rok said:
I imagine it's quite terrifying. Of course, terrorist apologists are unable to distinguish between an adjective and a noun and therefore cry, aha! terrorism! It is extremely juvenile behaviour.
Click to expand...

The grammar is irrelevant. War is terrorism with a bigger budget. Furthermore, US "military campaigns" frequently employ "actual terrorists" as foot soldiers. Both use violence as a political tool.

You are. In this very thread. And in pretty much every post you make on this forum.
Click to expand...

:D You obviously don't read the majority of the posts I make on this forum!


To clarify what you are saying, please quote an example and explain how it justifies or minimizes the crimes of actual terrorists.

16.5 said:
Quoting lying scumbag truthers makes me a truther, well ain't that something!

Kinda funny that you did not address the fact that DRG was lying, JJ.
Click to expand...

Sorry, you misunderstand. I wasn't calling you a Truther, just suggesting that you pin yourself to your Truther wall for dodging my questions.


Sword_Of_Truth said:
In a two month period earlier this spring, 9/11 truthers murdered three police officers and an armed security guard.
Click to expand...



I imagine that would have made you very happy though it wasn't exactly murdering children at random on the street, now was it? Please don't frighten poor scott.in.taiwan any further by recklessly impersonating the cheap and irresponsible fear-mongering of tabloid newspapers.
 
Last edited:
lashl said:
rules lawyer kitty finds in favour of d'rok.

badkitty.jpg
Click to expand...

ftfy...
 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
sorry, you misunderstand. I wasn't calling you a Truther, just suggesting that you pin yourself to your Truther wall for dodging my questions.
Click to expand...

I am sorry, I seem to have become distracted by your fellating of convicted terrorists to see that you had asked me a question at some point.

So I paged back through the thread, stopping frequently to shower after reading a truther post.

And I found your questions, which were in "answer" to my question to you.

And I realized that you are a complete troll. Go slurp your Kool Aid, sweetie.
 
16.5 said:
I am sorry, I seem to have become distracted by your fellating of convicted terrorists to see that you had asked me a question at some point.

So I paged back through the thread, stopping frequently to shower after reading a truther post.

And I found your questions, which were in "answer" to my question to you.

And I realized that you are a complete troll. Go slurp your Kool Aid, sweetie.
Click to expand...


Do you have anything of substance to share?

Answering my questions will, hopefully, answer your question. If not, we can discuss your question further.
 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
Do you have anything of substance to share?

Answering my questions will, hopefully, answer your question. If not, we can discuss your question further.
Click to expand...

I've added all the substance that I am going to share, sweetie.

Hey look, another Mosque bombing.

But Jihad Jane was lecturing us about the United States, If I recall correctly.

Whoops, suicide bomber.

But Jihad, do go on and run from the OP, as always, you have terrorists to service.
 
JihadJane said:
Rules lawyer kitty needs its kitty litter changed. Any volunteers?
Click to expand...


Pfft. That just goes to show how little you know. Rules Lawyer Kitty is a smart and savvy outdoor cat who makes rational and considered decisions based on facts and evidence. No kitty litter required.
 
Mr.D said:
Tell us, JihadJane. Is this how you define 'terrorism?' That it is a synonym for war?

If not, please tell us what your definition of terrorism is.
Click to expand...

Using terror for political purposes.


BenBurch said:
I say the US Government should charge all these guys as terrorists themselves as they are giving aid and comfort to enemies of the United States.
Click to expand...


An interesting definition of terrorist!
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
I've added all the substance that I am going to share, sweetie.

Hey look, another Mosque bombing.

But Jihad Jane was lecturing us about the United States, If I recall correctly.

Whoops, suicide bomber.

But Jihad, do go on and run from the OP, as always, you have terrorists to service.
Click to expand...



So you aren't going to answer my questions, then?
 
Last edited:
JihadJane said:
So you aren't going to answer my questions, then?
Click to expand...

Ohhh! Clever retort! Fiendishly so, you are the regular Mohemmed Atta of wit.

You see, and i am sorry if I sound a little bit peevish here, one (such as yourself) usually does not whine about having your questions answered when one (such as yourself) runs away from answering a question in the first instance.

You see, that makes you a hypocrite. Here is another GREAT example of a hypocrite: in a thread about a huge fraud lying in support of a convicted terrorist, someone comes into the thread bitterly complaining about the United States, while at the same time refusing to condemn either the terrorists or the huge lying fraud.

That makes them a hypocrite. I'd like to think that you learned something that you can share with one of your terrorist pals during pillow talk tonight.
 
This follows logically from the Truthers claims that really was an inside jobby job job. The "official story" used these poor men as scapegoats or gullible patsies, of course they're innocent.
I would love to see how that resonates with the group as a whole. It would force a lot of the part time Twoofs to take a hard look at the actual consequences of what it is they're saying. I could see a schism opening up where you have the different camps divided over how to view the men. The thought of siding with Al-Qaeda might be unpalatable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom