• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed Griffin and Truthers Supporting Convicted Terrorist

Orphia Nay

Penguilicious Spodmaster
Tagger
Orphia Nay
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
52,497
Location
Australia
This story has been up at 9/11 Blogger and Screw Loose Change for a week, and it's just had an update:

"Dear friends,
as David Ray Griffin announciated in his letter to the 9/11 Truth Community on 9/30/09 on this blog, the website www.justiceformounir.org is now up and running.

The Committee for Mounir el Motassadeq is an international campaign for the reopening of his case, after a Hamburg (Germany) court sentenced him to 15 years in prison, for allegedly helping his friends, Mohamed Atta and Co. to prepare the attacks of 9/11. Mounir is undoubtedly innocent. First, he did not know anything of the preparations for 9/11. And second, there is not a shred of evidence that his friends, Mohammed Atta and Co. participated in the attacks of 9/11.

By demanding the reopening of the trial, it is our aim to force a judicial determination that there exists no evidence of Muslim participation in the attacks of 9/11."


In Griffin's letter, he wrote:

"Our best chance of getting an investigation of 9/11 is probably through the court system, perhaps especially the court system of another country. The Mounir case may present a unique opportunity to get the falsity of the official story exposed."

That's some lovely, cognitively dissonant conviction there. ;)

I note that (a few) US truthers have jumped on this European bandwagon while remaining noticably mute about Khalid Sheik Mohammed. :oldroll: ;) Truthers. Always able to underwhelm you. :)
 
Last edited:
It was only a matter of time before he took the next step in his revolting 9/11 "truth" journey.

Why not just piss on ground zero in order to get media attention, David?
 
I love the page where they talk about the vilification Mohamed Atta has received from the press:

9. „The mass murderer Mohamed Atta.“ (Der Spiegel, 29 May 2004)

Shameful defamation of an innocent person [see legal definition of "innocent"]
Click to expand...

It almost reads like a parody 9-11 Troof site.
 
And second, there is not a shred of evidence that his friends, Mohammed Atta and Co. participated in the attacks of 9/11.
Click to expand...


There are no words...
 
As I pointed out on the blog, they claim that the FBI "still" isn't sure who the hijackers are, sourced from a press release from September 27th, 2001. They also complain that none of the hijackers have been convicted in court. Seems to me though that it would be hard for them to receive a fair trial, based on the fact that they are dead on account of flying planes into buildings.
 
"Dear friends,
as David Ray Griffin announciated in his letter to the 9/11 Truth Community on 9/30/09 on this blog,..."

I wonder if anyone from Al Qaeda will be making a similar announciation?
 
This is my favorite part.

9. Did the court take note of reports that Mohamed Atta and Marwan Al Shehhi were seen in the Philippines in 1997 drinking alcool [sic] and sleeping with prostitutes?

- No.
Click to expand...

If that isn't the death rattle of the official story, then I don't know what is.
 
orphia nay said:
By demanding the reopening of the trial, it is our aim to force a judicial determination that there exists no evidence of Muslim participation in the attacks of 9/11.
Click to expand...
Proof positive that religion causes brain damage.

orphia nay said:
perhaps especially the court system of another country
Click to expand...
Someone want to tell the ******** that Germany is a foreign country with a foreign court.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
David Ray Griffin said:
And second, there is not a shred of evidence that his friends, Mohammed Atta and Co. participated in the attacks of 9/11.
Click to expand...

Nice to see that DRG has, quite demonstrably, crossed the line from misrepresentation and innuendo to outright lying. He might be excused for saying that the evidence is fabricated, misinterpreted or inconclusive, but he's clearly stating that it doesn't exist. Since he himself has discussed a lot of it, he can't even pretend he doesn't know it exists.

Dave
 
Again, personally I think it is Brilliant.

R. Gage was doing it too. It is called finding the gravy train and riding it. The Twoof movement in the west is dying. So go to the home of the terrorists homes and say "you are not guilty, no it was ..." and then get the donations.

ethically repulsive, but economically brilliant
 
orphia nay said:
That's some lovely, cognitively dissonant conviction there. ;)
Click to expand...


You don't know what those words mean. I could tell you why justiceformounir is a worthwhile cause with a good chance of being successful, where the injustice lies and who's to blame for it. What you would experience then is cognitive dissonance. Same that happened in your abandoned Anthony Shaffer thread.
 
Childlike Empress said:
You don't know what those words mean. I could tell you why justiceformounir is a worthwhile cause with a good chance of being successful, where the injustice lies and who's to blame for it. What you would experience then is cognitive dissonance. Same that happened in your abandoned Anthony Shaffer thread.
Click to expand...

Do you agree with this statement?

And second, there is not a shred of evidence that his friends, Mohammed Atta and Co. participated in the attacks of 9/11
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom