Liar
it's that . . .19 kamikazee muslims hijacked 4 commercial airliners and flew 1 each into WTC1, WTC2, the Pentagon and Shanksville, causing massive damage to the perimeter and core columns of the twin towers.
Yup
stripping off the fireproofing and igniting raging fires and sending an unignited stream of jet fuel down an elevator shaft all the way to the basement,.
Creating an accidental fuel-air situation which cause a vapor explosion - which can be more powerful than plastic explosive.
where it jumped to another elevator shaft, reversed direction and came up to the lobby, ignited and blew out the windows,.
Didn't have to, the explosion would have been powerful enough to do that from below ground.
then the aforementioned raging fires heated up the floor trusses to the point where they sagged and pulled inwards on the heated core and perimeter columns, eventually breaking them which caused the mass of the tower above to come crashing down on the floor below, pulverizing almost all of the non-metallic material into fine powder.
Heated materials change their physical properties. Did you ever take a science class in your life, or put something in a microwave? And I saw lots of stuff in that rubble pile that was not fine powder. That's from your own photos.
and shredding all 287 steel columns into roughly 30 foot lengths and ejecting said powder and shredded steel hundreds of feet laterally in all directions,.
A. the "aforementioned powder" was a CT strawman, since it's obviously not true from a quick glance at a pic of the rubble. Not that something so obvious is good enough for a CTer - or else the "free fall" lie wouldn't exist. And real controlled demolitions don't pulverize everything non-metallic into fine dust, so even if this were true, how does this prove a conspiracy?
B. The material used to build the WTC was brought there on flatbed 18-wheelers, which use trailers of 30-40 feet. 30-foot lenghts are to be expected. How does this prove a conspiracy?
then continuing downwards and doing the same thing to the next floor, and the next (while appearing to jump in 4 or 5 floor increments), occasionaly advancing a floor assembly 20 stories ahead of the collapse wave in a "piston fashion" which simulatneouly crushed drywall into dust,.
Evidence of the 4-5 foot increments? After a few seconds the collapse is obscured in dust and smoke. Drywall doesn't exactly hold up to billions of tons falling straight down onto it.
focused this dust into a tight jet pattern and expelled it out exactly one window on each of two faces of the building, continuing to add mass and speed above the collapse front while this accumulating mass became invisible and showed no sign of itself, repeating the "jet plume" trick several more times, proceeding all the way to the ground,.
Where else would that air go? Invisible? What the hell are you talking about?
where the invisible accumulated pulverizing slegehammer of destruction finally disappeared altogether and left behing a chimney of smoke with a distinct mushroom top,
If you throw a puff ball mushroom it will puff into a mushroom cloud (no pun intended). I've seen mushroom clouds come out of dirt clods I've thrown. How else would you expect the smoke to behave? How does this prove a conspiracy?
and billowing clouds of dust which looked remarkably like the pyroclastic flows of a volcano (but which weren't).
Sulfuric acid looks like drinking water - thirsty?
leaving behind a very small pile of rubble, (considering the size of the towers) which somehow imitated a blast furnace inside and melted steel down for months afterward,
14 stories high and 3 acres in area is very small? Considering the towers were mostly 1100 feet of air, that averages out to a little more than 10 feet of rubble for free-standing tower. I think that's about what I'd expect from a pancaking of the towers. And nobody said that was molten steel in that rubble - the recovery workers dipped steel buckets in whatever that was (my guess is aluminum) without having the buckets melt. That kinda tells me that wasn't steel.
meanwhile another jet crashed into the Pentagon leaving almost no sign of itself and no sign of its passengers yet somehow left DNA samples,
There was plenty of wreckage of the plane if you chose to look at the evidence. Not to mention bodies of passengers, and the knocked down light poles. And the witnesses by the hundreds. And the conspicuous absense of all those passengers by their families, work-places, friends, etc. And the conspicuous absense of an American Airlines 757.
and some round part of the aircraft travelled all the way through the building and stayed perfectly intact enough to punch a very round exit hole through reinforced concrete but then disappeared,
That would have been a landing gear. It never disappeared. The hole wasn't round until it was enlarged by emergency personnel. You either are lying about this or you are deliberately not looking at the evidence very closely. And the plane didn't punch all the way through the building. It punched through 3 of the 5 concentric rings.
meanwhile the forth jet crashed because brave passengers tried to wrestle control away from the hijackers and crashed the plane straight down into a field where it disintegrated and left no sign of itself whatsoever.
Engines, landing gear, chunks and fragments of fuselage, a smoking crater in the ground, personal effects of the passengers,
pieces of the passengers, and the same conspicuous absense of that plane and all the passengers in their daily work and home lives are "no sign"? In the words of Mickey Rourke in
Sin City, "here's a sign."
Gravy, I think that's what you're working with.
And guess what, it makes sense and fits the evidence. On the other hand, I could stick a sharpie in my ass with the tip sticking out, put on a pair of white briefs, do a bunch of jumping jacks on a trampouline, and come up with a more coherent theory than yours with what would be written on the inside of them.
