Gratitude, Compulsion, Idiocy or Nobility?

[Kumar]

Please translate this gibberish into a known Earth language.

Sorry,pls manage. Anyhow, whether those species which are used for human food are not idiots since they do not understand nurshing, love, feed, shelter etc are given by their owners for an ultimate intention to slaughter them. Also they usually come back to owners house, even if set free. Ok?

 

[Mojo]

Sorry,pls manage. Anyhow, whether those species which are used for human food are not idiots since they do not understand nurshing, love, feed, shelter etc are given by their owners for an ultimate intention to slaughter them. Also they usually come back to owners house, even if set free. Ok?

All we have learned so far in this thread is that your magical thinking extends to anthropomorphism, and that you think that livestock that escape usually return to their owners (although you have provided no evidence for this). And that you seem to think that plants ought to take some sort of action against their oppressors.

 

[Mojo]

I also want to check if those animals, birds and even botanical, naturally take us bit differently, being seiner most?

Do you mean "Steiner"? Is this something to do with biodynamics?

 

[Peregrinus]

Wherein we see Kumar has a wrong-headed view of animal husbandry, agriculture, nature's processes and ultimately reality itself.

 

[fuelair]

Sorry,pls manage. Anyhow, whether those species which are used for human food are not idiots since they do not understand nurshing, love, feed, shelter etc are given by their owners for an ultimate intention to slaughter them. Also they usually come back to owners house, even if set free. Ok?

Not our job to manage/correct..... Your job to write it out clearly and understandably. This is true of everyone here!!!!!!!

As to the above, it is lacking in clarity and most of us will not make any effort to clarify it as you show no interest in doing so or learning how to do so.

 

[fuelair]

It can be difficult to distinguish between idiocy and profound thought at times.

I am having no trouble with it in these threads!!!!!

 

[fuelair]

I also want to check if those animals, birds and even botanical, naturally take us bit differently, being seiner most?

Could you possibly replace seiner with the correct word to which you refer? Or present a definition of seiner that makes it clear as an actual word in English and is applicable to your point??

 

[dann]

I feel, none in topic subject, nor the ñature, but it càn be mistaken identity to ús like eldest brother, guardian or parent type. Somewhat overestimate/overbelief that whoever nurse n love or who is senier will not kill. ?

I have no idea what you are talking about!

 

[fuelair]

Wherein we see Kumar has a wrong-headed view of animal husbandry, agriculture, nature's processes and ultimately reality itself.

In all fairness, I am quite sure K has a great understanding of animal husbandry!!!

 

[bruto]

Yes, but from our POV, we should also see, what we are getting and what we are forcibly taking.

That's a completely meaningless response. Our own point of view may be important in some way, but it does not change what a plant does, or what nature is, how it grows, or why. To believe otherwise is ill-considered mystical mush.

If plants had a point of view, I suppose all harvesting would be seen as forcible but what difference does this make? To the poet, perhaps, the ivy assaults the wall, but a metaphor for the way the world works is not an insight into individual thoughts. Nature is arranged as it is. "Frogs Eat Butterflies. Snakes Eat Frogs. Hogs Eat Snakes. Men Eat Hogs.

There are of course some people who believe they are enlightened or ennobled by becoming more aware of their place in nature, but the plants themselves do not know who is a friend or foe of their species. In the land of vegetables individuality is elusive. If you live on fallen fruit like Lowell's prison pacifist companion, or talk to the corn like a Hopi, you do it for yourself.

You should get your muddy feet out of the world of medicine and read more poetry.

 

[Mojo]

I have no idea what you are talking about!

Nor does Kumar.

 

[fuelair]

Even then, others are slaughtered in front of them, still their behavior seems not change.

Do you understand the concept of concepts? Most animal life has no real concept of life/not life. Thus, their concepts do not change in the presence of what would be evidence to more developed animal life. You are now free to ponder the Meaning of Life!!!!!

 

[fuelair]

It need to be checked under following things.

1. They come back, even if they look other animals are slaughtered in front of them.

2. Is it humans to those animal interactions or animal to animal also and if not, do they expect some more naturally from humans?

3. Can it just be their nature in the benefit of humans?

Item 2 is meaningless as written. Really, this is not a joke, it is actually meaningless as it is written.

Item 1 is a true statement insofar as it is possible to translate it into meaningfully phrased English but otherwise, JUST a statement. Item 3 is a very poorly phrased question and, as written, is pretty much pointless.

 

[Mojo]

Can it just be their nature in the benefit of humans?

It is in the nature of domesticated animals to be domesticated. They have been selected and bred by humans to be useful to humans.

 

[Dave Rogers]

Could you possibly replace seiner with the correct word to which you refer? Or present a definition of seiner that makes it clear as an actual word in English and is applicable to your point??

In a sudden flash of insight, I suspect he means "senior". While it doesn't make his posts make sense, at least it makes them comprehensibly nonsensical.

Dave

 

[sackett]

Just for once,

In a sudden flash of insight, I suspect he means "senior". While it doesn't make his posts make sense, at least it makes them comprehensibly nonsensical.

Dave

Kumar is making a kind of sense.

Doktor Professor Seiner Most was Dozent im Tierekraftliche Artz at the Swiss Institute of Quackery in Plotz from 1934 to 1887. He studied and self-published in the field that Kumar is referring to, and finished his career in the Lachenakademie.

Kumar is too modest to appeal to authority. He drops hints and expects us to pick them up, compost them, and spread them on our pastures anew.

 

[JayUtah]

Thanks but I think. as I said;...

No, none of that is what actually happens in animals bred for food. Animals generally don't see others slaughtered, at least in a commercial slaughterhouse, because it's a restrained, individualized process. And let's say, in the hypothetical case, one hog sees the one in front of it slaughtered. It's too late then. What's he going to do, text all the other hogs?

Have you ever actually been to a farm?

 

[deaman]

I am checking, if those species which are slaughtered in human's use but also nurshed by them, naturally take human beings bit differently due to flowwing reasons:

1. Being seiner most?

2. One who nurse will not kill?

Esp, if no such type of interaction exist between animal to animals.

I get the distinct feeling that English is not your primary language and I am unable to decipher your meaning. Sorry.

 

[John Jones]

I feel, none in topic subject, nor the ñature, but it càn be mistaken identity to ús like eldest brother, guardian or parent type. Somewhat overestimate/overbelief that whoever nurse n love or who is senier will not kill. ?

Edited by zooterkin: 

<SNIP>
Edited for rule 0 and rule 12.

 

[John Jones]

nvm