Gore to endorse Dean

Supercharts said:
With Gore along Dean will also have to allow Barbara Brasil on his team.

I believe you mean Donna Brazile.

Or possibly Barbara Bush, but I consider this much less likely.
 
The funny thing is, I heard on ABC news tonight that Gore was desperate to associate himself with someone who could actually BEAT Bush next year.

If that's the case, why did he run in 2000? It's a sad comment when you can't even endorse yourself!

Never mind, Dean is a semi-psychotic volcano waiting for an excuse to erupt. I sincerely hope the Dems nominate him so they can hit rock bottom. Only then will they begin to rise again as a viable political philosophy.

But it won't be this year. I'll give you Dean with a spread of 12 states. Any takers?
 
Jocko said:
I'll give you Dean with a spread of 12 states. Any takers?
Sounds good, Jocko. But these terms can be slippery. Does that mean you're giving me eleven states, as in large rectangular ones?
 
Regnad Kcin said:
It's a curious, counter-intuitive bit of news that Sen. Lieberman didn't find out the old-fashioned way, that is, direct from Mr. Gore. So unusual, in my opinion, that I suspect there's a component of the story we're not hearing.

I was thinking the same thing. As much as I dislike Gore, it is hard to believe he would be so cowardly, or discourteous at the very least.
 
Gore's endorsement of Dean probably won't have much of an impact on the voters. It may impact the campaign finance money people, though, and that is what really counts.

Wait til Mrs. Clinton comes out with her endorsement. Then the sparks will really fly. But she is pretty wily, on the other hand. She'll probably wait until there is a solid first place contender.
 
Luke T. said:
Gore's endorsement of Dean probably won't have much of an impact on the voters. It may impact the campaign finance money people, though, and that is what really counts.

Wait til Mrs. Clinton comes out with her endorsement. Then the sparks will really fly. But she is pretty wily, on the other hand. She'll probably wait until there is a solid first place contender.

I though that the Clintons endorsed Clark, and look what happened to him. I just wonder if Gore is endorsing Dean to give Lieberman a boost.

Or it just could be that Gore really is the slime bag I always thought he was.


Politics ya just gotta love it.
 
VicDaring said:
I don't think this is that tough to understand, but here's Dean's policy statement:

Mideast Peace Process

I do not see anyting new here, except

_______________________________________________

Continuing this progress will require the full engagement of the United States at the highest level.

________________________________________________

Where in his forien policy statment he lists his priorities.

_________________________________________________

First, defeat the threat posed by terrorists, tyrants, and technologies of mass destruction.

Second, strengthen our alliances and ensure Russia and China are fully integrated into a stable international order.

Third, enlarge the circle of beneficiaries of the growing world economy.

And fourth, ensure that life on our fragile planet is sustainable.
__________________________________________________

Why no mention of Israil here? Or does he put them in with the terrorists and tryants.
 
Originally posted by Jocko

Dean is a semi-psychotic volcano waiting for an excuse to erupt. I sincerely hope the Dems nominate him so they can hit rock bottom. Only then will they begin to rise again as a viable political philosophy.

But it won't be this year. I'll give you Dean with a spread of 12 states. Any takers?
Sounds good, Jocko. But these terms can be slippery. Does that mean you're giving me eleven states, as in large rectangular ones?
Finally, don't you think?. A Bush supporter rational enough to shut up and just bet.

How much, Jocko?
 

Back
Top Bottom