Good ol' ADF at it again.

Here's the fine point: Had she been on "the other side", with a pro-choice protest using exactly the same mechanics, she would not (in theory) have been stopped because pro-choice isn't a "religious" position.]

that is completely unsupported.

According to school rules, pro-choice people would not be allowed to wear armbands and hand out fliers, either.

Of course, it's real easy for you to throw out crappy accusations like this given that the pro-choice group has not tried violating any school rules, and therefore hasn't had to be stopped.
 
I disagree. This is typical Beerina, who regularly defends attempts by religious people to get special rights to use public resources to promote their religion.

I realize now that I was thinking of someone else that started with a B, but am not going to say who, in case he doesn't like being mistaken for others.
 

Back
Top Bottom