• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

God loves no one

Naw. It's been around for several millenia before James Bond.
 
It involves time travel, a pineapple, and... I'd rather not talk about it.

Just... don't look for fossilized remains of any British spy's remains.
 
I should get to writing a Holy Book, shouldn't I?

Hmm... this might prove to be an intriguing project.
 
In the Beginning, there was the Big Bang...


...And then came the False Gods, upon the minds of the believers...


...But then, lying in front of the Earth the whole time, was the Golden Eye of the Wulf, that breathed life into crops, staved off the night, and took the world out of shadow through its everlasting light.
 
Very poetic, I just started with a bunch of thou shalts and immature ranting in mine.

"Thou shalt makest love with thy finest available booty, and mark ye should that booty verily do.

Thou shalt remember the holy drinketh hours and it is five o'clock, no later and no earlier. Five shall be the hour thou shalt drinketh at, and the number of the drinking shalt be five. Six shalt thou not drink, neither drink thou at four, excepting that thou then proceedeth to five. Seven is right out. Once the number five, being the fifth number, be reached, then drinkest thou thy Holy Booze of Thy Choosing down thy mouth hole, which being delicious in my sight, shall enjoy it. And, ye, shalt though always remember it is five o'clock somewhere"

I was bored at 17. >.>
 
If we extrapolate on the world's most powerful people, its an easy analogy for understanding how God could fall short of our expectations.

Its curious that many atheists seem to be angry with God.

Personally, I hate ghosts.
 
quarky said:
If we extrapolate on the world's most powerful people, its an easy analogy for understanding how God could fall short of our expectations.
Click to expand...
Only if we accept that God is fallible and has as weak a will as a mortal.

Its curious that many atheists seem to be angry with God.
Click to expand...
This is actually a misunderstanding, as I honestly don't believe in God at all. I'm angry with Christian views of God, because they put forth an unjust God, and demand that we act servile to Him without any evidence for His existence. They also act like their God is a great wonderful being even in spite of all the evidence against it (in their book and in reality), given the presumptions in their arguments. It makes me angry that some people actually posit this as a "good" idea, and they tell me that I should respect this idea and hold their God in the highest regard.

If we were talking Greek gods, I'd still find them unjust, but at least they don't act pretentious about being "perfect". They're more powerful than humans and they're childish about it, but damnit, they don't pretend to be otherwise.
 
Last edited:
Its curious that many atheists seem to be angry with God.
Click to expand...
Same reason I frequently get pissed at Jack Bauer, Dolores Umbridge, and other creatures of fiction. Because they're, well, evil.
 
Have you tried Ganeesh?

Gods were a lot more fun before they became one. Ultimate power corrupts.
 
Lonewulf said:
Yes, this is ignoring the whole "God doesn't exist" thing. So sue me. Also, Deists need not apply (nor anyone that does not believe in Hell or any kind of punishment in the afterlife).

God doesn't love anyone. Not me, not you, no human on planet Earth.

I use the same logic as I would, in saying that a father that abuses his children if they don't make a decision that would make them miserable, doesn't love his children.

There's no good logical argument against this. The only way to sidestep it is to either refuse to believe that God exists, or refuse to believe in any kind of divine-based punishment in the afterlife.
Click to expand...

Personally, I believe that there are 5 evil gods, and 2 good ones. The bad ones outnumber the good ones, this is why there is so much evil of the world. The names of the good ones are Jerost and Vapos, and the bad ones are Hiija, Jilk, Samasa, Niva, and Yolt.

No god is omnipotent, but all are omniscient. Vapos is the loving god, he loves everyone. Jerost loves only those who worship him or Vapos.

Hija, Jilk and Samasa, do not really hate humanity; they just dislike it. Niva hates everyone; Yolt hates only those that worship Jerost and Vapos.

Heaven was of course created by the good gods; hell by the bad ones. Whether a person goes to hell or heaven is not based on good deeds at all, but on luck. It all depends on who comes for his soul first -> a good god, or a bad one. Those who worship Jerost have a slightly better chance than the others, since BOTH Jerost and Vapos cares for them, for the others only Vapos will try to come. (Only me and some of my close friends believe in Vapos, so it is us who have the better chance ).

Occasionally, Jerost or Vapos catch someone from hell, and take him from heaven. This is good news, since the bad gods can't do the opposite.

IT IS UNKOWN how the world will end. Maybe the good gods will win, and the world will become a much better place; maybe the bad gods will win, which I sincerely hope will not happen. We cannot do much to help... We are powerless in the god struggles.

For more information, and donations go to

http://www.geocities.com/onetruereligion/
 
Last edited:
------

If you ask me what is the evidence - I will say - well of course, none! It is a matter of faith, entirely. I do not force this belief on others, this is a very liberal faith. You may criticize it, say that it is ********, I don't mind.

And if you ask "Well, other people have faith too?" - Sure they do, but my faith is valid because I believe by faith that only my faith is valid.

And if you tell me - "Well, that is circular logic" - Aha! It would almost be a good argument... But I have the perfect response. I had a revelation from Jerost, and he told me that circular proofs are OK when proving this religion. So I have no problem with circular logic. (This religion shouldn't be proved via ad hominems, and ad populum, and ex nihilo logical fallacies ; but circular logic, begging the answer, and post hoc ergo propter hoc can be used according to him, so he said).

For more information, and donations go to

http://www.geocities.com/onetruereligion/
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom