• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Moderated GNIS Search

I notice that my explanation for all this "Lethbridge" malarkey has gone unnoticed...

Clearly the owners of that joinery firm in the Great Wen are possessed of Jedi/Ben Gesserit stylee mind control powers and have made you all, especially Bubba, ignore the bleedin' obvious.
 
I notice that my explanation for all this "Lethbridge" malarkey has gone unnoticed...

Clearly the owners of that joinery firm in the Great Wen are possessed of Jedi/Ben Gesserit stylee mind control powers and have made you all, especially Bubba, ignore the bleedin' obvious.

Sorry I didn't follow the link until now. It's obvious now I see it.

Lethbridge Lines. Carpenters. Two guys, called Lethbridge and Lines. It's literally there in plain sight. like some kind of chapter end reveal in a Dan Brown novel. And you know who else was a carpenter? I've said too much.
 
It's not even the initial error, which was confusing Alberta with Saskatchewan. This Alaska thing was a last-minute addition IIRC.

ETA - When someone says "I think that there is a Lethbridge in Alaska," they don't mean "a geographical feature," either. Like "I think that there is a Springfield in Missouri," they are talking about a city name. Carry on.

As I said before, Bubba's use of a capital 'L' in his phrase 'a Lethbridge' rules out it being a geographical feature.
 
The word Lethe seems to have nothing to do in terms of origin with the term Leth has in Lethbridge which seems to be Celtic and not Greek.


Correct.

Of course no one implied otherwise. I'd say Lethe/Lethes were only mentioned as part of his research notes.....as where I suggested he included "a Lethbridge in Alaska" and a mythical river named Lethes as raw data collected in normal research (as mentioned several times), ie research which the guy is good at.



Aside from the fact Lethbridge originated has a family name in Devon England and Lethe is the name of a river in the Greek underworld.


Correct.


I checked the Canadian Geographical Names Database (CGNDB) http://www4.nrcan.gc.ca/search-place-names/search according to it there is Lethbridge Lakes, Two very small lakes on Baffin Island next to each other. Named in 1951.

In Saskatchewan there is a Lethbridge Lake named in 2004. part of it is in the Northwest Territories.

There is a Lethbridge Road in the Province of New Foundland and Labrador near the village of Lethbridge.

There is a Canadian Armed Forces training range called Lethbridge near Lethbridge Alberta.

There is a small lake called Lethbridge in Manitoba named in 2020.

All of those names seem to be allusions to Lethbridge Alberta or the Lethbridge family.



I find it interesting that it was very easy to check all this out and also that many of the names are late and postdate, with the possible exception of Lethbridge in New Foundland, the founding of Lethbridge Alberta.

I also find it interesting that in the USA the name Lethbridge is totally absent has a name of a habitation or a geographical feature which did quite surprise me.


Agreed...Thanks. Maybe you accessing sources the guy uses.


Your finding "a Lethbridge" in NW Saskatchewan confirms my initial inclusion of NW Sask.

In my (brief and incomplete) search, NW Sask first appeared as a flag/pin on google maps. When I enlarged it, I found no Lethbridge. So I did not pursue it, beyond initially mentioning a NW Sask Lethbridge early on these pages.

As I said I dont much care about confirming because I've already seen enough to know he is right about this name game played by elite puppetmasters. Why certain critics get all hysterical about, in their objections to the idea,seems rather odd to me. Perhaps because it generally undermines their house of cards.

Regarding Baffin Island waters, thanks. Finding "a Lethbridge" body of water was indicated in part of the guy's original info I shared here.

"Here" of course refers to this hallowed hall, full of highly esteemed, brilliant, critically thinking, open minded, respectful, courteous, honest, thoughtful, truly genius and very polite thought leaders,....all of which terms certify their status as luminaries here at ISF, clearly the pinnacle of professional "skeptic" world thinkers....demonstrating that they are not arrogant ignorant mean spirited morons and stupid fools. I commend them for that.


I find it interesting that it was very easy to check all this out, and also that many of the names are late and postdate, with the possible exception of Lethbridge in New Foundland, the founding of Lethbridge Alberta.

Yes it is easy to check. I have seen enough of the guy's alignments to know he is reliable, so I did not bother doing so.


Also, good for you. There is no end date applied to the data set. The guy I got it from was posting current findings until he paused around 2010 or so.


He never got around to saying anything about whether or not the Lethbridge family's enjoyed any ownership share or family connection to Hudson Bay Co or any subsidiary outfits back in the day involved with assigning names to places, or even any parties still practicing the name game.

Is the Lethbridge family still around?
 
Correct.

Of course no one implied otherwise. I'd say Lethe/Lethes were only mentioned as part of his research notes.....as where I suggested he included "a Lethbridge in Alaska" and a mythical river named Lethes as raw data collected in normal research (as mentioned several times), ie research which the guy is good at.






Correct.









Agreed...Thanks. Maybe you accessing sources the guy uses.


Your finding "a Lethbridge" in NW Saskatchewan confirms my initial inclusion of NW Sask.

In my (brief and incomplete) search, NW Sask first appeared as a flag/pin on google maps. When I enlarged it, I found no Lethbridge. So I did not pursue it, beyond initially mentioning a NW Sask Lethbridge early on these pages.

As I said I dont much care about confirming because I've already seen enough to know he is right about this name game played by elite puppetmasters. Why certain critics get all hysterical about, in their objections to the idea,seems rather odd to me. Perhaps because it generally undermines their house of cards.

Regarding Baffin Island waters, thanks. Finding "a Lethbridge" body of water was indicated in part of the guy's original info I shared here.

"Here" of course refers to this hallowed hall, full of highly esteemed, brilliant, critically thinking, open minded, respectful, courteous, honest, thoughtful, truly genius and very polite thought leaders,....all of which terms certify their status as luminaries here at ISF, clearly the pinnacle of professional "skeptic" world thinkers....demonstrating that they are not arrogant ignorant mean spirited morons and stupid fools. I commend them for that.




Yes it is easy to check. I have seen enough of the guy's alignments to know he is reliable, so I did not bother doing so.


Also, good for you. There is no end date applied to the data set. The guy I got it from was posting current findings until he paused around 2010 or so.


He never got around to saying anything about whether or not the Lethbridge family's enjoyed any ownership share or family connection to Hudson Bay Co or any subsidiary outfits back in the day involved with assigning names to places, or even any parties still practicing the name game.

Is the Lethbridge family still around?

A few points:
1. You refer to research notes, raw data and incomplete conclusions, and a pause after 2010. If so much of this is unfinished, why bother with it? No conclusions about 'royals/elites' can be drawn from this. You can't even explain it coherently yourself.
2. Do any of these Lethbridges actually line up, do they line up with Jerusalem, and does it need a flat earth map to get them to do so? If so, what does this mean? Remember, this is your claim, so it's up to you, not others, to show this.
3. Have you tried to contact the author? I've had no clear answer from you about this.
4. This 'name game played by elites'- what is it, and why does it matter?
 
Correct.

Of course no one implied otherwise. I'd say Lethe/Lethes were only mentioned as part of his research notes.....as where I suggested he included "a Lethbridge in Alaska" and a mythical river named Lethes as raw data collected in normal research (as mentioned several times), ie research which the guy is good at.






Correct.









Agreed...Thanks. Maybe you accessing sources the guy uses.


Your finding "a Lethbridge" in NW Saskatchewan confirms my initial inclusion of NW Sask.

In my (brief and incomplete) search, NW Sask first appeared as a flag/pin on google maps. When I enlarged it, I found no Lethbridge. So I did not pursue it, beyond initially mentioning a NW Sask Lethbridge early on these pages.

As I said I dont much care about confirming because I've already seen enough to know he is right about this name game played by elite puppetmasters. Why certain critics get all hysterical about, in their objections to the idea,seems rather odd to me. Perhaps because it generally undermines their house of cards.

Regarding Baffin Island waters, thanks. Finding "a Lethbridge" body of water was indicated in part of the guy's original info I shared here.

"Here" of course refers to this hallowed hall, full of highly esteemed, brilliant, critically thinking, open minded, respectful, courteous, honest, thoughtful, truly genius and very polite thought leaders,....all of which terms certify their status as luminaries here at ISF, clearly the pinnacle of professional "skeptic" world thinkers....demonstrating that they are not arrogant ignorant mean spirited morons and stupid fools. I commend them for that.




Yes it is easy to check. I have seen enough of the guy's alignments to know he is reliable, so I did not bother doing so.


Also, good for you. There is no end date applied to the data set. The guy I got it from was posting current findings until he paused around 2010 or so.


He never got around to saying anything about whether or not the Lethbridge family's enjoyed any ownership share or family connection to Hudson Bay Co or any subsidiary outfits back in the day involved with assigning names to places, or even any parties still practicing the name game.

Is the Lethbridge family still around?

Whatever. Lethbridge Alberta was founded in 1874 because of coal found near by. Originally called Coalbanks the town was renamed in 1885 Lethbridge in honour of William Lethbridge a share holder in the Northwest Coal and Navigation company. Every use of the Lethbridge name in Canada, with the possible exception of Lethbridge in New Foundland, seems to be references to the city of Lethbridge and indirectly references to the family Lethbridge.

Earlier you claimed you weren't that interested in researching any details of the claims at all and had not done so. and it was you you suggested alternate versions of Lethbridge.

The bottom line is that there is no Lethbridge in Alaska or in fact in the entire USA either has a town, city etc., name or the name of a geographical feature. Instead we have Lethbridge used has the name of two habitations in Canada and a couple of geographic features all, with one possible exception, dating from after 1885. How this supports any woo nonsense about lines and elite naming practices is beyond me. It is simple, later uses of the name Lethbridge are references to Lethbridge Alberta.
 
Correct.

Of course no one implied otherwise. I'd say Lethe/Lethes were only mentioned as part of his research notes.....as where I suggested he included "a Lethbridge in Alaska" and a mythical river named Lethes as raw data collected in normal research (as mentioned several times), ie research which the guy is good at.






Correct.









Agreed...Thanks. Maybe you accessing sources the guy uses.


Your finding "a Lethbridge" in NW Saskatchewan confirms my initial inclusion of NW Sask.

In my (brief and incomplete) search, NW Sask first appeared as a flag/pin on google maps. When I enlarged it, I found no Lethbridge. So I did not pursue it, beyond initially mentioning a NW Sask Lethbridge early on these pages.

As I said I dont much care about confirming because I've already seen enough to know he is right about this name game played by elite puppetmasters. Why certain critics get all hysterical about, in their objections to the idea,seems rather odd to me. Perhaps because it generally undermines their house of cards.

Regarding Baffin Island waters, thanks. Finding "a Lethbridge" body of water was indicated in part of the guy's original info I shared here.

"Here" of course refers to this hallowed hall, full of highly esteemed, brilliant, critically thinking, open minded, respectful, courteous, honest, thoughtful, truly genius and very polite thought leaders,....all of which terms certify their status as luminaries here at ISF, clearly the pinnacle of professional "skeptic" world thinkers....demonstrating that they are not arrogant ignorant mean spirited morons and stupid fools. I commend them for that.




Yes it is easy to check. I have seen enough of the guy's alignments to know he is reliable, so I did not bother doing so.


Also, good for you. There is no end date applied to the data set. The guy I got it from was posting current findings until he paused around 2010 or so.


He never got around to saying anything about whether or not the Lethbridge family's enjoyed any ownership share or family connection to Hudson Bay Co or any subsidiary outfits back in the day involved with assigning names to places, or even any parties still practicing the name game.

Is the Lethbridge family still around?

Whatever. Lethbridge Alberta was founded in 1874 because of coal found near by. Originally called Coalbanks the town was renamed in 1885 Lethbridge in honour of William Lethbridge a share holder in the Northwest Coal and Navigation company. Every use of the Lethbridge name in Canada, with the possible exception of Lethbridge in New Foundland, seems to be references to the city of Lethbridge and indirectly references to the family Lethbridge.

Earlier you claimed you weren't that interested in researching any details of the claims at all and had not done so. and it was you you suggested alternate versions of Lethbridge.

The bottom line is that there is no Lethbridge in Alaska or in fact in the entire USA either has a town, city etc., name or the name of a geographical feature. Instead we have Lethbridge used has the name of two habitations in Canada and a couple of geographic features all, with one possible exception, dating from after 1885. How this supports any woo nonsense about lines and elite naming practices is beyond me. It is simple, later uses of the name Lethbridge are references to Lethbridge Alberta.
 
Correct.

Of course no one implied otherwise. I'd say Lethe/Lethes were only mentioned as part of his research notes.....as where I suggested he included "a Lethbridge in Alaska" and a mythical river named Lethes as raw data collected in normal research (as mentioned several times), ie research which the guy is good at.

Correct.

Agreed...Thanks. Maybe you accessing sources the guy uses.


Your finding "a Lethbridge" in NW Saskatchewan confirms my initial inclusion of NW Sask.

In my (brief and incomplete) search, NW Sask first appeared as a flag/pin on google maps. When I enlarged it, I found no Lethbridge. So I did not pursue it, beyond initially mentioning a NW Sask Lethbridge early on these pages.

As I said I dont much care about confirming because I've already seen enough to know he is right about this name game played by elite puppetmasters. Why certain critics get all hysterical about, in their objections to the idea,seems rather odd to me. Perhaps because it generally undermines their house of cards.

Regarding Baffin Island waters, thanks. Finding "a Lethbridge" body of water was indicated in part of the guy's original info I shared here.

"Here" of course refers to this hallowed hall, full of highly esteemed, brilliant, critically thinking, open minded, respectful, courteous, honest, thoughtful, truly genius and very polite thought leaders,....all of which terms certify their status as luminaries here at ISF, clearly the pinnacle of professional "skeptic" world thinkers....demonstrating that they are not arrogant ignorant mean spirited morons and stupid fools. I commend them for that.




Yes it is easy to check. I have seen enough of the guy's alignments to know he is reliable, so I did not bother doing so.


Also, good for you. There is no end date applied to the data set. The guy I got it from was posting current findings until he paused around 2010 or so.


He never got around to saying anything about whether or not the Lethbridge family's enjoyed any ownership share or family connection to Hudson Bay Co or any subsidiary outfits back in the day involved with assigning names to places, or even any parties still practicing the name game.

Is the Lethbridge family still around?

Re. the highlighted: I am not aware of any 'alignments' you've posted so far that have been within a thousand miles of being correct.
Which 'reliable' ones have you seen? More importantly, why didn't you post them, instead of the wildly and comically wrong ones you've shown us so far?
 
So it looks as if we have a set of alignments that are not found to be accurate, by persons unknown for reasons unknown, the purpose unknowable and the result unknowable, found on sources unreliable, but it's really significant. Impressive sleuthing indeed! It dances to the beat of the music of the spheres.
 
I'm starting to think this is some sort of roundabout way to "prove" a flat or at least not a spheroid earth.



No


Wrong

Flat Earth Maps have nothing to do with the Flat Earth Cult. Historically, Portolani and Mappamundi were popular flat earth maps, according to accounts of early cartographers/navigators/pilots.

Can you tell us whether or not those flat earth maps appeared before, or after the Flat Earth Cult drew a map?

When did the Flat Earth Cult surface, anyway ?

What distinguishes the Flat Earth Cult map from actual flat earth maps.?


(I ask you because you are the wisest, kindest, most considerate, least mean spirited, and most thoughtful skeptic I have ever encountered.)
 
Last edited:
I apologize if I step unduly into the duel, but a map is not a picture.

What I'd presume is the difference between a flat earth cult map and a plain old flat map is just that. People who make charts know that they're not depicting the world.
 
No


Wrong

Flat Earth Maps have nothing to do with the Flat Earth Cult. Historically, Portolani and Mappamundi were popular flat earth maps, according to accounts of early cartographers/navigators/pilots.

Can you tell us whether or not those flat earth maps appeared before, or after the Flat Earth Cult drew a map?

When did the Flat Earth Cult surface, anyway ?

What distinguishes the Flat Earth Cult map from actual flat earth maps.?


(I ask you because you are the wisest, kindest, most considerate, least mean spirited, and most thoughtful skeptic I have ever encountered.)

I don't believe in flat-earthers. They don't actually exist. Note I also said non spheroid earth.

There's no need to try to flatter me. I know I'm a dick and I'm comfortable with it.
 
Last edited:
No


Wrong

Flat Earth Maps have nothing to do with the Flat Earth Cult. Historically, Portolani and Mappamundi were popular flat earth maps, according to accounts of early cartographers/navigators/pilots.

Can you tell us whether or not those flat earth maps appeared before, or after the Flat Earth Cult drew a map?

When did the Flat Earth Cult surface, anyway ?

What distinguishes the Flat Earth Cult map from actual flat earth maps.?


(I ask you because you are the wisest, kindest, most considerate, least mean spirited, and most thoughtful skeptic I have ever encountered.)

Bubba, the only people who use the term "flat earth map" are flat earthers. Actual cartographers and navigators simply say "map", or more accurately, "chart". "Mappa mundi" is simply a generic term for a world map from the Medieval period. These maps are wildly inaccurate, and of no real use as navigational charts. They rarely correspond with one another. Just throwing in the term "mappa mundi" doesn't hide your ignorance of cartography - it doesn't hide your failure to demonstrate even one of the alignments you claimed to exist.

Peppering a lot of nonsense with a few words found on the internet is what's done by people who want to sound like they know what they're talking about, but genuinely don't. Everything we need to know about your cartography skills, and your credulity, can be found in this map.

6NZ5PdYl.jpg
 
Last edited:
No


Wrong

Flat Earth Maps have nothing to do with the Flat Earth Cult. Historically, Portolani and Mappamundi were popular flat earth maps, according to accounts of early cartographers/navigators/pilots.

Can you tell us whether or not those flat earth maps appeared before, or after the Flat Earth Cult drew a map?

When did the Flat Earth Cult surface, anyway ?

What distinguishes the Flat Earth Cult map from actual flat earth maps.?


(I ask you because you are the wisest, kindest, most considerate, least mean spirited, and most thoughtful skeptic I have ever encountered.)

Historically, that would appear to be utter bilge.
https://www.britannica.com/technology/portolan-chart

http://gallery.lib.umn.edu/exhibits...n-to-portolan-chart/what-is-a-portolan-chart-

Now, you have made mention of "Flat Earth Cult", and are asking questions about their activities.
You first need to establish what this cult is, when it was formed, and who formed it.
Then we can move on to their activities.
Remember- Burden of Proof. Your claim, so your responsibility to provide evidence.
Over to you.
 
Flat Earth Maps have nothing to do with the Flat Earth Cult.

False. Well I know you are just trolling here, but a flat earth map is one that tries to, well depict a flat Earth. and they all fall, well, flat.

Historically, Portolani and Mappamundi were popular flat earth maps, according to accounts of early cartographers/navigators/pilots.

Can you tell us whether or not those flat earth maps appeared before, or after the Flat Earth Cult drew a map?

Obviously before the current flat earth cult. However, even early maps tried, with varying success, to depict the surface of a round Earth.

When did the Flat Earth Cult surface, anyway.

Depends on how you define it. Flat Earthers have been around for centuries, but the internet- based version is obviously newer.

What distinguishes the Flat Earth Cult map from actual flat earth maps.?

Question makes no sense, but any serious map employs (or attempts to employ) some kind of projection in order to depict a round Earth on a flat paper.

(I ask you because you are the wisest, kindest, most considerate, least mean spirited, and most thoughtful skeptic I have ever encountered.)

Ah, you are obviously not speaking to me, then.

Hans
 
Last edited:
As ever keep to the topic of this thread - I've moved some posts to AAH because they occurred after Bubba's derailing incoherence, the actual on topic parts of those posts can be reposted if you want.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Darat
 
I'll quote the relevant parts of Bubba's post. He can address it when he gets back from his suspension.

The rest I'll leave on the compost heap where it belongs.

Bubba said:
Wrong

Try asking a pilot or mariner .
As I pointed out in July -
By the way, can you provide a citation for your claim, "aviators use AEP, aka flat earth maps"? I'm looking at an actual FAA VFR chart right now, and it says in the corner that it's a Lambert Conformal Conic Projection.

As I specified....Mappa mundi (and Portolani) were early versions of AEP.
Medieval mappa mundi have slightly more relationship to a modern azimuthal equidistant projection than a bear skin rug.

"To modern eyes, mappae mundi can look superficially primitive and inaccurate. However, mappae mundi were never meant to be used as navigational charts and they make no pretence of showing the relative areas of land and water." - source

Cartographers know the difference between the various projections and AEP. Thats why flat earth maps is a nickname for AEP.
Again, the only people who use the term "flat earth map" are flat earthers. No aviators or mariners, even if they use an AEP chart, ever say, "hand me that flat earth map, will ya?".

You clearly threw in the term "mappa mundi" like a pinch of rosemary, thinking that it would make "the guy's" **** sandwich seem like haute cuisine. Continuing to lie about it doesn't make that any less obvious. And it certainly doesn't obscure the fact that you have yet to provide a single example of any three locations of like name lining up.
 
Last edited:
No aviators or mariners, even if they use an AEP chart, ever say, "hand me that flat earth map, will ya?".

Attention passengers, welcome to United Airlines flight 192. In around 90 minutes, those of you on the lefthand side of the plane should have a good look out the windows. There be dragons.


keVXKVN.png
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom