GMOs: This is World War III- It Just Isn't Labeled

[catsmate]

actually it wasn't a cancer study and it was well known and admitted by all that the numbers of animals was small and inadequate to be conclusive for a cancer study.

Only after Séralini tried to his the inadequecy of his study, which is still cited by anti-GMO loons.

But of course the ethical thing to do (and I believe in this case legal requirement as well, but I am not a lawyer so let lawyers decide that) when doing a toxicological study and finding an inconclusive emergent result of potential cancer causing agents, is to publically call for further studies specifically designed for cancer and following a cancer protocol. (which varies from a toxicological protocol)

Oh sweet jeebus, your actually trying to make Séralini to be some kind of hero for his flawed study.

I would also like to point out that in fact you are arguing on the unethical side of this "WWIII battle", the side that has been proven in a court of law to be using libel and fraud to support their position. AND you too appear to me (again I am not a lawyer) to be perilously close to crossing that ethical boundary yourself.

 

[Red Baron Farms]

It seems someone or something messed up my source link, regardless of how it happened, I fixed the broken link. Here it is:

The Seralini affair: degeneration of Science to Re-Science?

 

[tinribmancer]

Vid the twoofer I know posted 2 months ago:

 

[mgardner]

Is everybody past the OP saying there is absolutely no truth in any of the OP's statements?

He's right to point out that there are serious problems with the American diet. He's wrong to suspect that this is the result of a conspiracy of Satan-worshipping catholics in black robes made from GMO fibers.