Trakar
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 12,637
A lot of us spend a lot of time trying to help inform our families, friends and the public about the threat of climate change but we are battling a very clever and well funded disinformation campaign and the amount of time that we have left to respond to the threat is quickly running out. Perhaps some of our time would be well spent developing better sources of information which are much easier for people that are new to this issue to comprehend and which are far more compelling than what is currently available.
I have two suggestions and would appreciate your thoughts...
Unfortunately, this is sounds more like an attempt to "re-invent the wheel," especially as everything you suggest has existed for at least most of the last decade.
I don't mean to be discouraging, merely noting that all that you suggest already exists. It isn't so much a matter of creating new and improved resources, as it is getting several generations of population to properly value critical thought and scientific principles.
Unfortunately, until the issue can be moved beyond the political decisions that will accompany accepting the science of AGW, we're forced to endure the current quagmire. Issues like this may play a role:
http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/07/12/exposed-to-facts-the-misinformed-believe-lies-more-strongly/
In a series of studies in 2005 and 2006, researchers at the University of Michigan found that when misinformed people, particularly political partisans, were exposed to corrected facts in news stories, they rarely changed their minds. In fact, they often became even more strongly set in their beliefs. Facts, they found, were not curing misinformation. Like an underpowered antibiotic, facts could actually make misinformation even stronger.
This bodes ill for a democracy, because most voters — the people making decisions about how the country runs — aren’t blank slates. They already have beliefs, and a set of facts lodged in their minds. The problem is that sometimes the things they think they know are objectively, provably false. And in the presence of the correct information, such people react very, very differently than the merely uninformed. Instead of changing their minds to reflect the correct information, they can entrench themselves even deeper.
“The general idea is that it’s absolutely threatening to admit you’re wrong,” says political scientist Brendan Nyhan, the lead researcher on the Michigan study. The phenomenon — known as “backfire” — is “a natural defense mechanism to avoid that cognitive dissonance.”