• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Global warming discussion V

It's why artificially reducing sunlight via aerosols has been discussed for decades - it makes a lot of sense as a temporary measure until greenhouse gases production is under control.
The only serious argument against it is that it might lead to complacency and slow the transformation.
 
Animated graph: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Concentration since 1958 (NASA)

Graphs: Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Nitrous Oxide (N2O), Methane (CH4), CFC-11, CFC-12 (NOAA)

Carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere just hit a 'depressing' new high (ScientificAmerican, May 5, 2026) Paywalled
Google summary:
Key Findings:
  • Record Level: The April 2026 average of ~431 ppm is the highest in human history and likely the highest in at least 2 million years.
  • "Wrong Direction": Climate scientists describe the unrelenting increase as a "depressing" sign that global warming is accelerating, according to Climate Central.
  • Annual Increase: CO2 levels are rising by over 2-3 ppm annually, indicating that current emissions reductions are insufficient.
  • Impact: The heightened concentration traps more heat, leading to extreme weather, rising sea levels, and melted ice caps.
  • Monitoring Risks: The Mauna Loa Observatory, which tracks this data, faces potential closure due to budget cuts, threatening to halt the world's longest-running direct CO2 monitoring record.
The trend highlights the continued, rapid buildup of greenhouse gases despite global efforts to curb emissions, with annual peaks typically occurring in April/May due to seasonal plant decay, notes NOAA.
 
Energy prices and data centers
Trump BREAKS Major Promise As Data Center Disaster Gets Spectacularly Worse (The Damage Report on YouTube, May 10, 2026 – 5 min.)
Donald Trump's own promises come back to haunt him as prices get so much worse.
Trump and AI leaders tout his ‘build your own power plant’ pledge - https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03...
"President Donald Trump joined leaders of several of the nation’s most powerful tech companies Wednesday in sending a message to cost-weary voters: The U.S. can win the artificial intelligence race without straining Americans’ wallets.
But the “ratepayer protection pledge” that Trump touted in the White House, alongside executives from companies including Amazon, Google and OpenAI, is unlikely to protect ordinary consumers from all of the electricity price increases driven by the rapid expansion of AI data centers, energy experts have told POLITICO. Trump’s effort to promote his energy-affordability message is also running up against the massive public attention focused on his war in Iran, a conflict that has inflamed concerns about the cost of living."


Trump on three different occasions:
... and I will cut your energy and electricity prices in half within twelve months of taking office: fifty percent.
A pledge that I'm making now, and we've done this uh a little bit over the last month or so, we are going to bring energy down by fifty percent, five-o percent, fifty percent, within 12 months from January 20th.
We will cut your energy prices in half within, mark it down, within – and you can get very angry at me if we don't do it – within twelve months your energy prices will be cut in half.
 
🇨🇦
Alberta-Canada deal takes a sledgehammer to one of the last remaining pillars of Canada’s climate plan (Climate Action Network, May 15, 2026)
Climate and civil society organizations across Canada are outraged at today’s announcement of the Canada-Alberta agreement to weaken industrial carbon pricing and double down on fast-tracking an oil pipeline to the west coast of British Columbia.
The agreement pushes back the deadline for Alberta to reach an effective carbon price of $130/tonne to 2040—a full decade later than previously planned, and now framed as a target rather than a minimum.



5 Reasons Why CCS is BS (Bunk Science) (Environmental Defense, July 25, 2025)
 
Last edited:
A lot of things might work with some investment and innovation.
Closing down power plants based on fossil fuels and replacing them with wind and solar actually works. Already. Now.
Meanwhile:
Top 5 Reasons Carbon Capture And Storage (CCS) Is Bogus (Food and Water Watch, July 20, 2021)
1. Carbon Capture Is an Expensive Failure
2. Carbon Capture Is Energy Intensive
3. Carbon Capture Actually Increases Emissions
4. Storage Presents Significant Risks
5. Carbon Capture Trades Off With Other Critical Solutions
The Con of Carbon Capture and Storage (The Australia Institute, July 26, 2023)
Australia emits almost 11 times the amount of CO2 captured by CCS across the entire world
Carbon Capture and Storage: The Billion Dollar Scam (EnvironmentalDefence.ca, Sep 23, 2025)

Carbon Capture & Storage is sci-fi greenwashing!
Watch this (again if you already did and forgot about it):
 
The Humber region in the UK is planning to build a carbon capture system, to capture emissions sites including but not limited to :
Drax biomass
Keadby gas power station,
Various chemical plants
The Humber region is the biggest source of industrial co2 in the UK, so if it's worthwhile, it will be here. Pumping carbon into spent gas fields under the north sea, it is also geological suitable.
In conjunction with hydrogen production, and a rather large offshore wind farm or two, it's exciting times around here.
This has been planned for years. I've seen presentations about this over 15 years ago.
 
Last edited:
CBI = The Confederation of British Industry.
According to Google, CBI is "the United Kingdom's largest and most influential business lobbying organisation."
Forgive me for remaining skeptical.

Tell us more about those presentations!
 
Canadians: "Wait, you're telling me the climate will get warmer and that's a bad thing? Um, yeah, okay... tell you what, we'll let all of you pay us for your carbon emissions and we'll just go ahead and "offset" them for you. At our special offsetting facility. Which doesn't give tours, sorry."
 
I find it hard to believe that Canada was ever "a climate leader." When was that supposed to be?
Canadian politicians write down the biggest numbers on pieces of paper, give the floweriest speeches, and send the largest delegations to COP and now they're allowing those nifty Chinese EVs into the country, just to piss off America.

It really comes down to those alt-right rural working stiffs preferring jobs and money over lofty ideals.
 
You mean, "those alt-right rural working stiffs" who have been told by Big Oil that anthropogenic global warming isn't real and that windmills cause cancer, whereas oil, gas and beautiful clean coal is healthier than brussels sprouts.
 
Nice to records tumbling by huge amounts in Europe.

If records are being broken by more than 1 deg C, what's next year going to look like with a probably strong El Nino added in?
 
Nope, those alt right rednecks know all about AGW, how can they not? They just prefer a paycheck from an industry that allows wealthy international commies to fly first class so they can take photos of starving Cubans for internet ass pats.

Then there's these guys


Big Indian (feather, not curry) has entered the chat.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom