Global Warming Conspiracy LOL

Here's an article in that in-the-pocket-of-the-oil-companies, conservative rag, the New York Times, on Gore's documentary:

But part of his scientific audience is uneasy. In talks, articles and blog entries that have appeared since his film and accompanying book came out last year, these scientists argue that some of Mr. Gore’s central points are exaggerated and erroneous. They are alarmed, some say, at what they call his alarmism.

“I don’t want to pick on Al Gore,” Don J. Easterbrook, an emeritus professor of geology at Western Washington University, told hundreds of experts at the annual meeting of the Geological Society of America. “But there are a lot of inaccuracies in the statements we are seeing, and we have to temper that with real data.”
Click to expand...

Somebody asked about when there were higher temperatures; the answer (from the same article) is about 400 years ago:

So too, a report last June by the National Academies seemed to contradict Mr. Gore’s portrayal of recent temperatures as the highest in the past millennium. Instead, the report said, current highs appeared unrivaled since only 1600, the tail end of a temperature rise known as the medieval warm period.

Roy Spencer, a climatologist at the University of Alabama, Huntsville, said on a blog that Mr. Gore’s film did “indeed do a pretty good job of presenting the most dire scenarios.” But the June report, he added, shows “that all we really know is that we are warmer now than we were during the last 400 years.”
Click to expand...
 
Roy Spencer thinks intelligent design is a scientific theory. Roy spencer is wrong about a lot of things.

2000_Year_Temperature_Comparison.png

Holocene_Temperature_Variations_Rev.png
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom