• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

George W. Bush: Sticks and Stones Pale in Comaprison

Meh. You can say alot of things about George, but I don't think racism is one of them. In fact I was extremely impressed at the way he handled the transition and, as far as I am aware, has kept his distance from current controversies.

He also had quite a multiracial cabinet when in office.
 
So, the left spends 8 years lambasting the man with some of the most insulting, heinous and ridiculous rhetoric.. ever. And he says it bothers him. And the response? "Stop whining".

Pitiful. It's the equivalent of punching someone in the face, and when they say "Ow, what you do that for?" you say "stop whining".

I can completely understand that it hurt his feelings to be called a racist. It should demonstrate that he actually did care about this stuff.

The premise of this thread is pathetic. I'm sorry, but it is.
 
Last edited:
Yes, being called a name hails in comparison to a lot things that happened in his presidency. He had to deal with the worst terrorist attack in recent history 8 months after being elected. His response to Katrina was a massive failure in government. The racist charge was something that hit him personally, and he's more than entitled to that opinion. It has nothing to do with politics.
 
Bush was not a great President, perhaps not even an average one. But to question his motives on such a constant basis isa bit over the top.
 
Bush was not a great President, perhaps not even an average one. But to question his motives on such a constant basis isa bit over the top.

Why? He was a horrible president that did many things that benefited his friends at the expense of our own economy, the lives of our soldiers and the lives and well-being of other countries.
 
Why? He was a horrible president that did many things that benefited his friends at the expense of our own economy, the lives of our soldiers and the lives and well-being of other countries.

So criticise him for being an incompetent but don't ascribe some kind of racist motive to it.
 
Could he have meant that the time around Katrina was the worst time of his presidency? He could have been talking a little more generally when he said that last bit.

So, the left spends 8 years lambasting the man with some of the most insulting, heinous and ridiculous rhetoric.. ever. And he says it bothers him. And the response? "Stop whining".

Pitiful. It's the equivalent of punching someone in the face, and when they say "Ow, what you do that for?" you say "stop whining".

I can completely understand that it hurt his feelings to be called a racist. It should demonstrate that he actually did care about this stuff.

The premise of this thread is pathetic. I'm sorry, but it is.
I don't think that's an apt analogy.

I think that the thread is about an interpretation that Bush said that the worst moment in his presidency wasn't the terrorist attacks, or anything about the wars, but an insult directed at him. That is different from being criticised for having a reaction to an insult.
 
Last edited:
//

Someone called me a name.

It was not "someone," it was virtually an entire POLITICAL PARTY.
Democrats number over 100,000,000 people.

This is HARDLY "someone."

It was, and IS, a cabal of haters who lie to promote their hatred and hate to promote their lies.

Let's conduct an experiment, shall we? Everywhere you go for a week, half of the people you see will call you a "racist" and a "Nazi" and a "fascist."

They'll say you're "stupid" but as the Left LOVES to say, "You can fix stupid."

You can't fix racism.

I mean, unless you're a Leftist. Democrats absolutely LOVED former Ku Klux Klan Kleagle Robert Byrd. They called him "the conscience of the senate."


If you're a Lefty, all you have to do is say "sorry" and it's good.

For Trent Lott, not so much. He's one of those (Neocons. You know, a Nazi).
 
Why? He was a horrible president that did many things that benefited his friends at the expense of our own economy, the lives of our soldiers and the lives and well-being of other countries.

Indeed, he :

1. Increased educational funding
2. Got rid of Saddam Hussein, who "murdered five to seven million Iraqis, the majority of them Shiites"
3. Restored decency to the Oval Office, whose previous resident jacked off into the sink, and spewed his semen on the blue dress of his young intern, not to mention signed the Welfare Reform Act, widely reviled by Leftists everywhere
4. Has a wife who is not a preening narcissist, and who has ALWAYS loved America

And on and on.


Of the countless hateful, malicious lies told about President Bush, undoubtedly the most hateful, most widespread one of all, that he "lied" about WMDs is exposed here, by Democrats, in their own words:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iSwSDvgw5Uc
 
3. Restored decency to the Oval Office, whose previous resident jacked off into the sink, and spewed his semen on the blue dress of his young intern,

I guess it depends on what you consider "decency". A lot of people these days, including me, don't really think that any personal actions between consenting adults are "indecent", although a lot of people, including me, think that they are and ought to remain a private matter. In other words, the only "indecent" thing about his dalliances with an intern is that we know about them.

His wife may or may not have other problems with his behavior but that, too, is a private matter.

On the other hand, I have read the "torture memo". I consider that pretty indecent.
 
I guess it depends on what you consider "decency". A lot of people these days, including me, don't really think that any personal actions between consenting adults are "indecent", although a lot of people, including me, think that they are and ought to remain a private matter. In other words, the only "indecent" thing about his dalliances with an intern is that we know about them.

His wife may or may not have other problems with his behavior but that, too, is a private matter.

On the other hand, I have read the "torture memo". I consider that pretty indecent.

I think Clinton should have stuck to starting wars based on fabricated evidence that get thousands of Americans and countless more foreigners (not that any American conservative gives a wet fart about dead foreigners) killed and waste a crapload of taxpayer money. You know, like the man who brought decency back into the White House.
 
So criticise him for being an incompetent but don't ascribe some kind of racist motive to it.

Given the incompetence and racism of the current administration, why do you think that LibTards wouldn't want to continue to play the Bush card?;)
 
I don't beleive Bush is racist. I think he's simply clueless and completely out of touch with average Americans.
 
Last edited:
It was not "someone," it was virtually an entire POLITICAL PARTY.
Democrats number over 100,000,000 people.

This is HARDLY "someone."
Mr. Bush expressed that he was very upset about Mr. West calling him a racist. Perhaps you didn't read the link.

As for the rest of your post, it's not very well reasoned. Or much coherent.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom