Shane Costello
Graduate Poster
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2001
- Messages
- 1,232
Originally psoted by PygmyPlaidGiraffe:
Retention of desireable traits such as increased muscle bulk in cattle.
Increased yields, introduction of new desireable traits, amplification of existing desireable traits, inbuilt pesticide resistance etc.
Your point being? I would have thought this goes without being said.
What matters is that genetic modification has been occuring for millenia now, in a less precise and controlled fashion than we're now capable of doing, yet none of the doomsday hypotheses of the anti-GM movement were ever realised. Historical context and motivations are irrelevant.
Context is important.
I would like to know what motivated these societies to cross breed species to get the desirable traits they wanted (in wheat or in livestock).
Retention of desireable traits such as increased muscle bulk in cattle.
What are the motivations to genetically modify species today?
Increased yields, introduction of new desireable traits, amplification of existing desireable traits, inbuilt pesticide resistance etc.
I would find it difficult to accept that human accomplishments are done independent of the contexts of survival, economy, beliefs/values, culture, community, and any others.
Your point being? I would have thought this goes without being said.
If we are comparing the accomplishments of a past society and how it applies to an argument of "it was done in the past so why make a fuss now" then I would like to determine the historical context and motivations of that society before drawing on an example of a past accomplishment.
What matters is that genetic modification has been occuring for millenia now, in a less precise and controlled fashion than we're now capable of doing, yet none of the doomsday hypotheses of the anti-GM movement were ever realised. Historical context and motivations are irrelevant.