.
Of course, your best knowledge is simply how to parrot lies told you by other deniers whose word you blindly accept despite having been corrected on such in the past.
Allow me to demonstrate it using what passes for denier logic: I assert that it was *you* that said that, and go you one better by citing my source:
post 7728 in this very thread.
Those of us not blinded by hate will get the point immediately, but I realize that at best you will ignore this post or at least pretend not to get that point, so let me explain it using as small of words as I can:
Page 152 of "Why Did The Heavens Not Darken?" contains the original.
No, sorry, forgot your thing about actual books.
Go to
http://books.google.com. Search for Why Did The Heavens Not Darken. Use the Search in book function to look for the word "proletariat" look at the entry for page 152. See what it says there:
.
See those things to the left of the second line? We big kids call those quotation marks, and use them to indicate the concept that what follows until the next quote mark is not our original work. This can also be assumed by Mayer's use of the ellipsis (those three dots?) indcating that he has removed some of that quote. Normal people don't tend to quote themselves nor to indicate such edits: they just write what they have to write, and don't write what they didn't mean to say. Now, look at the first 5 words there on that line. Do those appear in in your "quote" of Mayer? No, they don't.
So the answers to your questions about this, with proof and information on how you can verify that proof are: No, that's not what Mayer wrote, it's what he reported someone else as saying; and no, even that snippet you were spoon fed isn't accurate.
Have you learned your lesson about trusting deniers to tell the truth yet, or are you content with repeating their degenerate lies and having your face rubbed in it some more?
.
