MG1962
Unregistered
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2006
- Messages
- 17,252
Which of those witnesses actually poured the gas or was even an eyewitness?
And what point would it make. You dismiss every other witness what would be different here?
Which of those witnesses actually poured the gas or was even an eyewitness?
And what point would it make. You dismiss every other witness what would be different here?
From posts in a discussion forum dedicated to Nazi atrocities, war crimes, and extermination policies and actions, you conclude that, because most posts relate to the topic, that no one cares about criminal policies and actions committed by others than the Nazis? Your powers of reasoning seem not very strong. You might try Rodoh, or you might have tried Rodoh, for a good number of the non-deniers there showed a familiarity with, and concern about, other genocides which confounds your observation. I would also wager that by far most of the non-deniers who posted there have shown more real concern for the victims of recent wars than any of the deniers and their crocodile tears and attempts to use people's suffering to score debating points.It was just a distraction, but it's interesting how no one cares other then atrocity committed by Nazis.
I'm not really sure what the point is over OSR 24, but I realize there has been discussion about it over at RODOH so I'm not going to interfere.
Or so-called mainstream history. Of course, when revisionists find historians actually revising conclusions and adjusting balance, etc., as historians have consistently done with the Third Reich, working over the material from new points of view and dealing with new evidence, revisionists then adopt a mock horror at discovery of a "hoaxing" and make loud noises about "retreat" and "changing the story."I suggest you read Joachim Neander's recently published article on the human soap myth.
No, because I 100% intended to write what I wrote.
No, that's also not true.
I suggest you read Joachim Neander's recently published article on the human soap myth.
But I suspect you don't read much.
That's an excellent point. Discussing witnesses with these people is a waste of f-ing time.
Link?
.Wanna try that again. The first two sites dont work and the third is in a langauge I dont recognise
< emphasis mine >
.
Of course, sentence was passed in 2005 (after Irving had ducked the warrant for 6 years) so if he had served all of it, that means out in 2008.
And here we are, 2011 and Irving is *still* spewing his bile.
Guess CM also has a non-standard definition of "pretty dam < sic > close.
.
.
Of course, sentence was passed in 2005 (after Irving had ducked the warrant for 6 years) so if he had served all of it, that means out in 2008.
And here we are, 2011 and Irving is *still* spewing his bile.
Guess CM also has a non-standard definition of "pretty dam < sic > close.
.
Link?
.
It would appear that not even Irving does -- have you seen his page advertising his "Wolf Lair" tour? He cherry picked 11 comments from folks who went last year.
Only two even mention him.
The frikkin' *lake* they swam in got two mentions.
The busdriver got a kudos, for crying out loud.
.
And over 50 B I L L I O N in reparations?
.
You're not missing much -- it's German and refers to a study that never happened, which is why CM does not try to link to the study itself.
Nor does CM read German, zie is mindlessly parroting another lie zie was fed by the Cesspit, which zie was told was of some sort of value..
What are you trying to suggest here? That the Allies invented the Holocaust as a way of extracting war reparations from Germany?

Well, at one point, Ukrainians were being put to that task. It was precisely on my making that point that Dr. Terry posted a much more comprehensive list of people who held that responsibility.
.Give me some names he listed to make searching easier.