• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged Gen. McChrystal summoned to Washington over Rolling Stone profile

Puppycow

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Messages
34,163
Location
Yokohama, Japan
The war in Afghanistan doesn't seem to be going very well, and now this:

Gen. Stanley McChrystal summoned to Washington following magazine profile

KABUL -- The top U.S. general in Afghanistan was headed to Washington early Tuesday for an impromptu White House meeting, after apologizing for an upcoming magazine article that portrays him and his staff as flippant and dismissive of top Obama administration officials involved in Afghanistan policy.

The profile in Rolling Stone magazine, titled the "Runaway General," is certain to increase tension between the White House and Gen. Stanley McChrystal.

It also raises fresh questions about the judgment and leadership style of the commander Obama appointed last year in an effort to turn around a worsening conflict.

McChrystal and some of his senior advisors are quoted criticizing top administration officials, at times in starkly derisive terms. An anonymous McChrystal aide is quoted calling national security adviser James Jones a "clown," who remains "stuck in 1985."

Referring to Richard Holbrooke, Obama's senior envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, one McChrystal aide is quoted saying: "The Boss says he's like a wounded animal. Holbrooke keeps hearing rumors that he's going to get fired, so that makes him dangerous."

On one occasion, McChrystal appears to react with exasperation when he receives an e-mail from Holbrooke, saying, "Oh, not another e-mail from Holbrooke. I don't even want to read it."

U.S. ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry, a retired three-star general, isn't spared. Referring to a leaked cable from Eikenberry that expressed concerns about the trustworthiness of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, McChrystal is quoted as having said: "Here's one that covers his flank for the history books. Now if we fail, they can say, 'I told you so.'"

A U.S. embassy spokeswoman said she had no immediate comment on the piece.

The story also features an exchange in which McChrystal and some of his aides appear to mock Vice President Biden, who opposed McChrystal's troop surge recommendation last year and instead urged instead for a more focused emphasis on counter-terrorism operations.

"Are you asking me about Vice President Biden?" McChrystal asks the profile's reporter a at one point, laughing. "Who's that?"

"Biden?" an unnamed aide is quoted as saying. "Did you say Bite me?"
. . .
The timing of the piece could hardly be worse. Amid a flurry of bad news in Afghanistan and a sharp rise in NATO casualties, U.S. lawmakers and senior officials from NATO allied countries are asking increasingly sharp questions about the U.S.-led war strategy.

Who hasn't badmouthed their boss behind his back? In front of a reporter though?

I hate to bring up Vietnam again, but it seems like we have the same kind of problem. Our so-called "allies" in Afghanistan are basically corrupt and no match for the bad guys. Or is this just a "darkest before the dawn" moment? Things seemed to be pretty bad in 2006 and 2007 in Iraq before they started to get better.
 
Bad-mouthing your boss is one thing, but bad-mouthing your boss in the military is a bit of a no-no.

And doing it in front of a reporter, when you're a publicly known high-ranking official, is really just stupid.
 
Meh. Tempest in a teacup. This might be great for RS's lagging sales, but I didn't see anything to justify the outcry from the pundit class. I wonder how many read the article?
 
We put up with way worse than this from Patton. Of course, Patton was a legend in his own time. I don't know much about McChrystal.
 
I am neither surprised nor offended by the sentiments expressed in the article; that a theater commander would permit such talk with outsiders present is a another matter. At the very least it betrays an astounding level of naiveté on the part of command and senior staff.
 
Obama haters are gonna love this!

You might be surprised.

"So far, McChrystal hasn’t earned enough leash by winning anything. Regardless of what one thinks of the current C-in-C [the author doesn't like him], Obama is still the man elected by the people to run the executive branch and the military. The picture this article paints is one of a lack of discipline and respect, and the White House has every right to demand an apology and replace McChrystal with someone who understands better the subtleties of overall command and its politics."
 
McChrystal sounds like he knows his subject; his opinion of Biden strikes me as right on the money. Not very smart to reveal this to a reporter from Rotting Stump, of course.
 
This is certainly a fireable offense. But unless there is somebody who is up to speed right now, it would probably be a mistake to fire him.
 
Why?

ETA: I mean, I'm genuinely curious to learn your reasoning as to why I--an avowed Obama hater--would love this.

You have reason to be concerned. That the moron mouthed off about the president sort of supports the left's position that the extreme right knows nothing about the military and is destructive to proper morale, an example of that being this ranting, self-righteous poppinjaay talking smack in public about his superiors.

The Obama-basher give aid and comfort to loose cannons like McChrystal. So far, the only general I have heard defend McChrystal is that jerk McCaffery. Figures.
 
I don't know much about McChrystal, but it sounds like he has a titanic ego. Also, I'd like to know how journalists go about ingratiating themselves with their subjects.
 
You might be surprised.

"So far, McChrystal hasn’t earned enough leash by winning anything. Regardless of what one thinks of the current C-in-C [the author doesn't like him], Obama is still the man elected by the people to run the executive branch and the military. The picture this article paints is one of a lack of discipline and respect, and the White House has every right to demand an apology and replace McChrystal with someone who understands better the subtleties of overall command and its politics."

Shades of Truman/MacArthur...except that McChrystal is no Mac Arthur,and the GOP will have a hard time making him a Matyr.
 
I don't know much about McChrystal, but it sounds like he has a titanic ego.

I would think it remarkable if someone could rise to one of the highest ranks in the US military and not develop a bit of an ego.
 
I doubt that McChrystal, like any other general, would tolerate that kind of insubordination from anyone under his own command.

The president needs to send a clear reminder to the top brass that they have the privilege to command at his pleasure. I won't think much of him if McChrystal still has a job tomorrow.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom