Gage finally gets something right

Thanks CE for linking to Craig's nonsensical response, including an email from an obviously mentally disturbed family member , i.e. "distant cousin."

CE, I had a distant cousin who died there too, am I a family member?


Josef Princiotta doesn't write the email as a family member. He briefly introduces himself and mentions his "distant cousin" once, presumably his reason for being interested in 9/11.

Princiotta writes as a personal friend of Gage and Chandler who is disturbed by their actions and offers his help in mediating between the parties. For this you call the man "obviously mentally disturbed".
 
Last edited:
Josef Princiotta doesn't write the email as a family member. He briefly introduces himself and mentions his "distant cousin" once, presumably his reason for being interested in 9/11.

Princiotta writes as a personal friend of Gage and Chandler who is disturbed by their actions and offers his help in mediating between the parties. For this you call the man "obviously mentally disturbed".

CE, I know that you have swallowed CIT's nonsense, but would you give us a little *********** credit for not being credulous idiots? "Oh he mentions his fake family tie just merely in passing, and for no real reason..." Please, CE, unlike you, we can read:

"Here is some info on me and my distant cousin Vincent Princiotta FDNY Killed in the South Tower's destruction on 9/11."

What a scum ball.

And I don't think he is obviously mentally disturbed because he offered to mediate between groups of freaking nit wits. He is obviously mentally disturbed because he believes those nit wits. That and the hieroglyphic in his signature line.

You picked the wrong team, sport.
 
I wonder how this will reflect upon the other statesmen for ae911truth.

Dwain Deets is a spokesman for 911truth and he has categorically said that planes did not hit the pentagon. Do you think Richard will call into question the judgment, integrity and truthfulness of people like Dwain.

And then of course there is poor demented Ed Asner.
 
Never heard of the man. I just watched the 10 min video Craig embedded in the response. Mr Princiotta introduces himself. A crime scene investigator. Seems as mentally healthy as they get.


Craig embedded it in his response? You and Craig pals or something?

You backed the wrong horse, sport.
 
I wonder how this will reflect upon the other statesmen for ae911truth.

Dwain Deets is a spokesman for 911truth and he has categorically said that planes did not hit the pentagon. Do you think Richard will call into question the judgment, integrity and truthfulness of people like Dwain.

And then of course there is poor demented Ed Asner.

Could you please tell us which one is more demented? It's quite a contest, perhaps you can clarify it.
 
I give Gage credit where it's due, but a flat out rejection of CIT's theories is far from enough. He has many of the same standards in his WTC demolition canards, which for all intents and purpose makes him no more sane than he was to begin with.
 
Check out the Citizens Investigation Team web site... they are really fed up with Richard Gage, David Chandler who have deserted them. CIT complain that they have launched an unprovoked, sustained and extremely dishonest attack campaign against CIT, Pilots for Truth and our work.
.

popular-front.jpg


:pythonfoot:
 
So basically he took the CiT's word for it at face value and offered his support without bothering even the simplest bit of research first.
If I sell Gage a bridge today will it take him 18 months to find out I did not own it in the first place?:D

What a MORON!!

Typical of truthers, Gage probably only supported CIT because their theory went against the "official story" (the enemy of my enemy is my friend).

So either he never looked into their theories in the first place and now that he has he realizes how stupid they are....

...OR...

He was catching flack for supporting them which forced him to publicly distance himself from them.


Either way, I'm guessing he only spoke out because he perceived some possible benefit to be gained (financial, credibility, or otherwise) for doing so.
 
Either way, I'm guessing he only spoke out because he perceived some possible benefit to be gained (financial, credibility, or otherwise) for doing so.

Either that, or Craig and Aldo were bombarding him with their crap like they do everywhere they go. ;)
 
I had to bump this for someone. Many people forget that CIT and P4T are masters of the 'fly-over'. Gage's reputiation of that hypothesis has led to the current P4T melt-down. It is all Warren and Legge's fault :)
 
It takes a truly "special" mind to take statements from a dozen witnesses that a plane hit the Pentagon, and conclude from them that a plane didn't hit the Pentagon.

There's "stupidity" (that's Gage) and then there's flat-out how-do-you-morons-manage-to-breath idiocy (that's CIT). CIT's "logic" is so dumb that even other dumb people can spot the flaws in it.
 

Back
Top Bottom