Got this in an email:
"Tucked in at the start of our Northeast film premiere tour of Firefighters, Architects & Engineers: Expose 9/11 Myths is an historic teaching-and-debating opportunity that we just couldn't pass up.
A mathematics professor at the New Jersey Institute of Technology has invited two representatives of Architects & Engineers 9/11 Truth to address students and faculty from the school's civil engineering department in a Technology, Art and Science Forum titled "9/11 Critical Questions."
The 90-minute event will be held on Wednesday afternoon, November 11, at NJIT's Campus Center Ballroom in Newark, NJ.
Prof. Jay Kappraff, Ph.D., created "9/11 Critical Questions" in order to present various perspectives on the destruction of the third World Trade Center tower, known as Building 7, to 100-plus students and faculty from NJIT's John A. Reif, Jr. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
He is also inviting the students and faculty from the New Jersey College of Architecture and Design and from five other colleges within NJIT to attend the forum, and will be placing an article and an advertisement in the school-wide newspaper for that purpose.
"I created this forum because I feel strongly that the information about 9/11 that has been publicly distributed by the government and the media up to now is extremely incomplete and has many self-contradictions," explains the math professor. "We need to reopen the conversation."
Kappraff invited two speakers from AE911Truth — founder and CEO Richard Gage, an architect, and Tony Szamboti, a mechanical design engineer — whose presentations he had heard at other venues. "I was impressed by their detailed knowledge of the World Trade Center destruction, and thought that if they could present their ideas at an engineering school, we would have a chance to show, through reason rather than emotion, what was not covered properly in the official story."
Jay Kappraff, a mathematics professor at NJIT, is skeptical of the official account of the destruction of the three World Trade Center towers and has been seeking to host a technical forum where, he notes, "students can hear all sides of the highly controversial WTC 7 destruction and make up their own minds. We should be able to analyze and discuss the technical evidence of these extremely important structural failures in an open atmosphere free of bullying and accusations." To ensure coverage of the issue would not be one-sided, Kappraff also reached out to participants in — and sympathizers with — the official investigation of WTC 7, which was conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. But when he received no response from them, he arranged for members of NJIT's civil engineering department to create a panel to present their view of the events and to question the AE911Truth speakers.
In this debate-style arrangement, a member of the civil engineering department faculty will speak for the first 15 minutes on behalf of the government's official account of what happened to WTC 7. Then Tony Szamboti will have the floor for the next 25 minutes. He will explore the implications of the unexplained symmetrical free-fall destruction of the 47-story skyscraper.
Mechanical engineer Tony Szamboti, M.E., who specializes in designing and analyzing aerospace structures, appeared on the Fox News show Geraldo a few years ago to tell the world about World Trade Center Building 7. Szamboti is currently assisting an engineering research team at the University of Alaska Fairbanks with its year-long evaluation of Building 7's failure — a breakthrough project being funded by AE911Truth. Szamboti hopes students will take away from his talk the understanding that "engineering failures need to be correctly explained and understood to prevent their reoccurrence. What will be taught at NJIT is that engineers also need to scrutinize the explanations given for failures by others to ensure they actually explain the observables of a failure. Otherwise, appropriate decisions cannot be made moving forward. When it comes to light that a report purporting to explain a significant engineering failure does not do so, it is the duty of those in the profession to expose it as non-explanatory."
Following Szamboti's presentation, Richard Gage will give a summary of the physical evidence — including thermite incendiaries — that points to the controlled demolition of WTC 7......"
