• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Gaddafi's useful idiots.

Gazpacho said:
How much is the war against Gaddafi costing the US government each day? Are Native Americans who live on the rez, often in appaling conditions, not even slightly justified in questioning the political priorities involved?
Click to expand...

Brandishing "long live Gaddafi" signs? Get real Gaz.
 
Gazpacho said:
If that's what it takes to get people's attention, sure.
Click to expand...

Your position is therefore that a person brandishing "Long Live Ghaddafi" sign doesn't really support Ghaddafi, he just wants the funds that are currently going to oust him (about $10 million a day, apparently) to be diverted to the Native American community instead, and that the purpose of the sign is to attract attention and nothing else?

McHrozni
 
McHrozni said:
Your position is therefore that a person brandishing "Long Live Ghaddafi" sign doesn't really support Ghaddafi, he just wants the funds that are currently going to oust him (about $10 million a day, apparently) to be diverted to the Native American community instead, and that the purpose of the sign is to attract attention and nothing else?

McHrozni
Click to expand...

Well, it sure has got us talking about it.

Do you think that the funds could go to Native Americans? Just asking...
 
McHrozni said:
Your position is therefore that a person brandishing "Long Live Ghaddafi" sign doesn't really support Ghaddafi, he just wants the funds that are currently going to oust him (about $10 million a day, apparently) to be diverted to the Native American community instead, and that the purpose of the sign is to attract attention and nothing else?
Click to expand...
Could be. Pretty smart of them if it is. You'll have to ask them to find out.

It might also indicate that, from where they stand, they're not really impressed with the idea that the US is a better defender of human rights than Gaddafi.
 
Gazpacho said:
Could be. Pretty smart of them if it is. You'll have to ask them to find out.

It might also indicate that, from where they stand, they're not really impressed with the idea that the US is a better defender of human rights than Gaddafi.
Click to expand...

Or that they support Gaddafi and hate white people.
 
Virus said:
I knew that support for Gaddafi would be a fixture for the idiotic, simple-minded and loony-toon ideologues of the radical Left. Support for bloody totalitarians has been their thing since the Bolsheviks seized power in Moscow. This video from an "anti-war" demo featured some Native Americans delivering a hate-filled anti-white screed which the masochistic leftists couldn't get enough of. Note the "Long live Gaddafi" placard:

Click to expand...

I didn't hear either of those two say "white". I know that the guy did talk about the Indians being indigenous and he did use the word "wetbacks" but as far as I know the word "wetback" isn't typically used against white people.
 
Re: "Long live Gaddafi" signs.

Is assassinating leaders they don't like now official US foreign policy?
 
Gazpacho said:
Could be. Pretty smart of them if it is. You'll have to ask them to find out.

It might also indicate that, from where they stand, they're not really impressed with the idea that the US is a better defender of human rights than Gaddafi.
Click to expand...

None of which make sense.

McHrozni
 
angrysoba said:
Do you think that the funds could go to Native Americans? Just asking.
Click to expand...

You and I both know this is an absurd idea. It would require, literarily, for the US military to draw funds from budget allocations for native americans, which is legally unable to do.

This is precisely why I think Gazpachos' idea makes no sense whatsoever. It is significantly more likely they're Quackdaffis' useful idiots and nothing more.

McHrozni
 
McHrozni said:
You and I both know this is an absurd idea. It would require, literarily, for the US military to draw funds from budget allocations for native americans, which is legally unable to do.
Click to expand...
Are you dismissing as absurd the idea that there is a policy controlling the operation of the laws, and that the public might be able to affect the policy?
 
Gazpacho said:
Are you dismissing as absurd the idea that there is a policy controlling the operation of the laws, and that the public might be able to affect the policy?
Click to expand...

No. I'm dismissing as absurd the idea that the US militarily is clandestinely siphoning funds from Native Americans to it's campaign in Libya.

McHrozni
 
McHrozni said:
You and I both know this is an absurd idea. It would require, literarily, for the US military to draw funds from budget allocations for native americans, which is legally unable to do.
Click to expand...

I don't think anyone was suggesting that money meant for Native Americans was going to the military.

I think they were saying that the government spends money bombing Libya which it could allocate to Native Americans instead. I don't agree personally, but it is pointless arguing against a position nobody holds.
 
JihadJane said:
Re: "Long live Gaddafi" signs.

Is assassinating leaders they don't like now official US foreign policy?
Click to expand...

When you use airstrikes and artillery to put down protests you bring it on yourself. Instead of doing that, he shouldn't have done it.
 
Virus said:
When you use airstrikes and artillery to put down protests you bring it on yourself.
Click to expand...

Heck, you don't even have to actually do it. Just having it reported by defecting pilots and rebels who were storming army bases and seizing heavy weaponry from day two or three - was sufficient. Just fighting back in a civil war the rebels started was enough.
 
angrysoba said:
I think they were saying that the government spends money bombing Libya which it could allocate to Native Americans instead.
Click to expand...

Perhaps. Or maybe they just like Quackdaffi.

"Long Live X" usually means "I like X" after all.

McHrozni
 
People that support Quackdaff and complain about fiscal innneficiency.
 
It takes a very special talent to make Ghaddafi supporters seem to be more resonable have a clearer grasp of reality than yourself. Good work Virus.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom