You go by a name with "QC" in it, quote Blackstone's formulation ...
Yes, it is exciting isnt it, and Im glad it has captured your imagination. Enjoy.
Adultery & drugs. One is immoral yet legal the other is not in the slightest immoral, but is illegal.
you just repeat yourself endlessly without gaining understanding.
1. Whilst adultery is considered immoral by probably the greater portion of society, it isnt universally. Some couples have open marriages.
2. Adultery t is not considered immoral
to a level that justifies punitive measures by invoking laws that penalise you for it. Society deems this an issue that people work out by themselves, and rightly so.
3. Your claim that narcotic drugs are not immoral is a a biased and false assumption. If everyone could take some narcotic, and refuse to operate machinery, not assault others, and behave as though they were completely sober, then perhaps it could be considered immoral. But talk to police, drug counsellors, and ex addicts and you'll hear they all wish they had never been touced by it. It creates more trouble in society than it is worth.
4. Even supposed soft drugs like cannabis are showing long term damage to cognitive function now after 40 year studies.
5. Your immorality concept is not supported by employers who are increasingly drug testing employees, again, because people cannot be trusted to pace themselves.
6. Lets not even talk about drugs in sport, and IOC.
5. Drug usage is immoral in that it will cause decay in society, to a point where it will not function anymore and everyone is a drugged out zombie that doesnt function. Read the studies that show what effects alcohol abuse has on society, the economy, and medical services. Lost productivity, broken homes, and an overloaded hospital system. Tobacco has virtually been outlawed these days.
How does this relate to Tostee? See point 2. IT is not illegal (ie
seriously immoral) to be an asshat, even even it sends your moral compass into a spin. Criminally, he did nothing wrong on the night. Hence the unfounded lame charge of murder. If being an asshat was illegal, Wright might have been thrown in jail if she hadnt suicided. Of course, Gable being a tall man, must toe the white knight line and never even cite her for attempting to commit grevious bodily harm upon him. Of course, were the tables reversed, white knight police would have thrown him in jail immediately. Good ol' female privilege.
Serious immorality, is addressed through the creation of laws that penalise people in an effort to make them stop their self harming ways. that is all there is to it. You've been schooled.
You're a legal genius, no wonder you've been picked as a mouthpiece ....
Thanks again, but please, no more. 3 times is enough. Oh, and I wasnt picked, sorry to burst your silicone implants.
No it hasn't, so feel free to post details.
Yes it has. Look again. I dont spoon feed tailgaters (Defn: tailgater - one who reads the last few posts of a thread and comments in ignorance, instead of reading the entire thread and having full knowledge.)
Wow, a total fail win in both philosophy and maths in one single paragraph. You really are a genius.
Fixed it for ya, and thanks for the repeated adulation, but please dont, I've heard it too many times in my illustrious life.
The 8% is the majority of Poms who want dope legalised. Nothing to do with me, I don't live in England, but thanks for showing a few more of your biases.How do you feel about vaccinations?
Doesnt change anything does it. I was spot on. (Irrelevancy No 5 ignored - and counting)
There is no similarity between the two cases whatsoever.
Wrong again. From what I see in the Lundy thread, and I refer to the lat page where Samson schooled you about alternative murder motives, you're not even clued up on the Lundy case. But the similarity is that neither jury was not objective, analytical, nor unbiased. I dont have to explain how that applies to Lundy, but it was obvious in the tostee case, when a verdict took 3.5 full days to be delivered, on what was clearly an inability of a few dissenting jurors to come to grips with reality, and ditch their bias in a case that was a total no-brainer to decide.
Eric Thomas aka Gable Tostee got away with it on a technicality. Lundy is innocent.
Hilarious! Here we go again.
Fail 1: Lundy and Tostee are both innocent.
Fail 2: Tostee didnt get away with anything. There was no technicality. He didnt push her. He didnt harm her. The evidence specifically excluded those possibilities. She went mental and lost her mind for reasons only known to herself.
And as long as people continue to run a false narrative, I will be there to correct them. Enjoy.
Queensland law. Queensland jury. Always dodgy.
Nope. All law. All juries. Sometimes dodgy. Me, I would always choose a judge only trial, if they ever caught me for all my crimes.
Having my fate decided by a bunch of plebs off the street would almost be as distasteful as eating Wasabe.
