Of course he is. It seems violent, impulsive men whose acts kill young defenceless women can do no wrong in his view. Pistorius will rot in jail for many years. In my view, it's only a matter of time for Tosree to suffer a similar fate. At least he will never get a decent job again.
The falsehoods and concocted fantasies never seem to stop with this one , so its time for a series of corrections again.
1. Nothing in Tostee's history has violence. Put up proof if you think you have it, else stop posting lies to bolster your failed arguments.
2. Tostee killed no one. Some addle brained female lost her head because of mental / drug problems and killed herself, and no amount of obtuseness and artistic story telling by you about that fact changes it.
3. Calling her young and defenceless at 26 when she is within 2 years of Tostee's age and does Muay Thai makes you seem a typical 3rd wave feminist (claiming female privilege and victimhood status automatically by default)
4. Pistorius
will not "rot" in jail as you emotionally over state. He received a six year sentence which even if he served it all out with no parole, would see him complete the term by Mar 2019, however I think he will be paroled in 2017.
Heh, slow down. Trial judges usually look okay, but once they are promoted, and get to write up denied appeals they become masters in the craft of pure fiction.
In New Zealand I invite you to read appeals denied to Walter Bolton, Arthur Thomas, David Tamihere, Teina Pora, David Bain, possibly Scott Watson, and Mark Lundy . All of those bar possibly Watson are completely innocent, yet have a combined total of 11 fictional narratives by appeal court judges of crimes perpetrated by others. I'm not sure how badly Australian appeal courts behave, but they sure massacred Lindy Chamberlain. If Gable Tostee had been convicted of any crime I suspect he would be wasting time appealing.
I would be interested in reading them I suppose, but I dont know anything of NZ law, so I could never comment effectively on those appeals.Unfortunately, points of law do come down to personal interpretation and that is always subjective, but that is what judges are paid to do under Westminster judicial systems. Usually they are subject to appeal again in a higher court if you want.
We have been through this before. He could have thrown her out the front door and called the police.
No he couldnt, it wasnt that simple, as he described in his BBF post of 1 Dec 2014.
Did you not notice the respective size and strength of the two? Come off it. A small, drunk woman?
Come off it indeed. All just pure unfounded speculation as usual. Tostee was not a bodybuilder, all he did was tone his arms and chest. It is interesting to note how females give opinions on how a man should handle themselves in a fight, yet fighting is something 99% of women have no knowledge of. If you dont have an aggressive attitude and a knowledge of arm locking techniques, it isn't a straightforward matter to remove a female without harming them. Plenty of drunken females have caused damage to bouncers who handled them with kid gloves. Clearly this is what Tostee was doing with her. Tostee could have just busted her jaw, and dragged her out, and none of this would have happened. However he is obviously from that school that still thinks you treat women like ladies, not men. Another thing that people dont understand is , that tall people are usually non violent, as they are usually not the target of bullies,and they have not had experience of being in fights. Expecting someone like that to take control and bundle up a violent female is asking too much. Remember police need training to deal with these situations when being confronted with these matters, so how come Tostee is automatically expected to have these skills? Try employing some relevant context.
He caused her death whether this jury decided otherwise or not.
Wrong. She caused her own death. The jury correctly found that her actions were unreasonable and unpredictable. She was a psycho who would have topped herself somewhere eventually anyway.
We haven't heard the end of this. There will be a coroners inquest. Followed by a civil suit. Tostee may yet be bankrupted. His **** flat will be forfeited.
More unbridled garbage. You clearly have no understanding of these matters and are just making it up as you go along. More about that later.
Of course Tostee fanboys will say the coroner will simply rubber stamp the court decision. There have been many cases where the coroner has taken a contrary view. This is simply wishful thinking by the fanboys.
No, take a look at all the falsehoods you post - that is wishful thinking, spoken in absence of a true understanding of the facts, and legal procedure. The coroner has no reason to investigate anything. It is all clear cut from the trail . She clibed over without good reason. Nutjob. END OF STORY. Go back to watching CSI Miami, this is Australia.
.I often see new people arrive on this forum burning with zeal, often pretending to be people they aren't, on a mission to correct wrong thinkers. They post in one thread only and disappear, smugly thinking they have proven their point. They are fanboys.
Edited by Agatha:
Edited to remove breaches of rule 0 and rule 12. Please review your Membership Agreement, to which you agreed on joining this forum.
He was wrong about Pistorius. Totally. I'm going on his record.
And you were wrong about Tostee. Oh the delicious irony.
